Comparison of Occupational Noise Exposure Assessment Methods: A Systematic Review

被引:0
作者
Makaruse, Nyasha [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Maslin, Mike [1 ,2 ]
Shai-Campbell, Ziva [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canterbury, Sch Psychol Speech & Hearing, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
[2] Eisdell Moore Ctr Hearing & Balance Res, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Braun Sch Publ Hlth, Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
Dosimetry; Exposure assessment; Hearing conservation; Noise assessment; Noise-induced hearing loss; Occupational hazards; Occupational noise; Overall accuracy; HEARING-LOSS; ACCURACY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/AUD.0000000000001479
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives:The purpose of this systematic review of publications was to evaluate existing evidence on the accuracy and precision of alternative occupational noise assessment methods, with personal noise dosimetry as the reference.Design:A structured literature search was performed in Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Embase in July 2021 and 2022. The Covidence software was used for importing articles, screening titles and abstracts, full-text review, and study selection. Two reviewers independently conducted the title, abstract, and full-text screening of eligible studies. The reporting of this systematic review was guided by the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. The quality of selected articles was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies.Results:In total, 11 studies consistent with the study selection criteria were identified out of 327 articles from the initial search. The noise-measurement methods identified in the selected studies included subjective rating through a questionnaire, expert opinion, smartwatch, sound level meter, sound level meter combined with a radio-frequency identification system, smart devices, workgroup dosimetry sampling, task-based measurement (TBM), and hybrid TBM. The hybrid method (a combination of task-based, subjective rating, and trade mean measurements) was the best alternative to full-shift personal noise-dosimetry with a negligible bias of 0.1 dB, precision of 2.4 dBA, and accuracy of 2.4 dBA.Conclusion:A variety of lower-cost TBM methods had relatively high accuracy and precision levels comparable to personal dosimetry. These findings are particularly relevant for low-income countries where occupational noise measurements should be obtained with minimal work disruptions and costs. However, it should also be noted that TBMs are greatly affected by job variation, multiple tasks, or mobile tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:808 / 815
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in magnetic resonance environment: basic aspects and review of exposure assessment approaches
    Hartwig, Valentina
    Romeo, Stefania
    Zeni, Olga
    MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2018, 56 (04) : 531 - 545
  • [32] A Quantitative General Population Job Exposure Matrix for Occupational Noise Exposure
    Stokholm, Zara Ann
    Erlandsen, Mogens
    Schlunssen, Vivi
    Basinas, Ioannis
    Bonde, Jens Peter
    Peters, Susan
    Brandt, Jens
    Vestergaard, Jesper Medom
    Kolstad, Henrik Albert
    ANNALS OF WORK EXPOSURES AND HEALTH, 2020, 64 (06) : 604 - 613
  • [33] Occupations noise exposure and health impacts among fish harvesters: a systematic review
    Yadav, Om Prakash
    Sarkar, Atanu
    Shan, Desai
    Rahman, Arifur
    Moro, Lorenzo
    INTERNATIONAL MARITIME HEALTH, 2021, 72 (03) : 199 - 205
  • [34] Impact of occupational noise exposure on the hearing level in hospital staffs: a longitudinal study
    Wang, Tang-Chuan
    Yu, You-Cheng
    Hsu, Alan
    Lin, Jia-Yi
    Tsou, Yung-An
    Liu, Chiu-Shong
    Chuang, Kai-Jen
    Pan, Wen-Chi
    Yang, Chin-An
    Hu, Sung-Lin
    Ho, Chien-Yi
    Chen, Tzu-Liang
    Lin, Chia-Der
    Pai, Pei-Ying
    Chang, Ta-Yuan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 31 (16) : 24129 - 24138
  • [35] Impact of occupational noise exposure on the hearing level in hospital staffs: a longitudinal study
    Tang-Chuan Wang
    You-Cheng Yu
    Alan Hsu
    Jia-Yi Lin
    Yung-An Tsou
    Chiu-Shong Liu
    Kai-Jen Chuang
    Wen-Chi Pan
    Chin-An Yang
    Sung-Lin Hu
    Chien-Yi Ho
    Tzu-Liang Chen
    Chia-Der Lin
    Pei-Ying Pai
    Ta-Yuan Chang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 : 24129 - 24138
  • [36] Comparison of Multiple Measures of Noise Exposure in Paper Mills
    Neitzel, Richard L.
    Andersson, Marianne
    Andersson, Eva
    ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 2016, 60 (05) : 581 - 596
  • [37] Investigation of occupational noise exposure in a ship recycling yard
    Kurt, Rafet Emek
    McKenna, Stuart Alexander
    Gunbeyaz, Sefer Anil
    Turan, Osman
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2017, 137 : 440 - 449
  • [38] HEARING DAMAGE IN WORKERS FROM EXPOSURE TO OCCUPATIONAL NOISE
    Flores Pilco, Diego Armando
    REVISTA UNIVERSIDAD Y SOCIEDAD, 2021, 13 : 117 - 122
  • [39] THE RISK OF HEARING LOSS ASSOCIATED WITH OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO ORGANIC SOLVENTS MIXTURE WITH AND WITHOUT CONCURRENT NOISE EXPOSURE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Hormozi, Maryam
    Ansari-Moghaddam, Alireza
    Mirzaei, Ramazan
    Haghighi, Javid Dehghan
    Eftekharian, Fatemeh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2017, 30 (04) : 521 - 535
  • [40] A comparison of occupational and nonoccupational noise exposures in Sweden
    Neitzel, Richard L.
    Svensson, Eva B.
    Sayler, Stephanie K.
    Ann-Christin, Johnson
    NOISE & HEALTH, 2014, 16 (72) : 270 - 278