Sedation for Colonoscopy Procedures Using Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol-Fentanyl Infusions: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:1
作者
Seyam, Sameh Hamdy [1 ]
Aboelsuod, Mohamed Abdelgawad Abdelhalim [1 ]
Ahmed, Ismail Mohamed Abdelgawad [1 ]
Hassan, Abdallah Elabd [1 ]
机构
[1] Al Azhar Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anaesthesiol Intens Care & Pain Management, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Colonoscopy; dexmedetomidine; outpatient sedation; perioperative care; propofol; sedation;
D O I
10.4274/TJAR.2024.231485
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: Different anaesthetists for sedation or monitored anaesthesia care have been used for colonoscopy. The target of this research was the ability to perform colonoscopy under a painless degree of sedation and the prevalence of undesired proceedings. Methods: A total of 60 patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group D received dexmedetomidine and Group PF received propofol-fentanyl. Patients in both groups received the same infusion ratio. The minimum infusion amount of dexmetatomidine is (0.1 to 0.4 mu g kg -1 h -1 ) in Group D, whereas fentanyl is administered at a rate of 0.01 to 0.05 mu g kg -1 min -1 in the PF group during the approximately 45 -min colonoscopy. Results: Group D exhibited significantly lower modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scores at intraoperative time points T1 -T12. Group D also exhibited significantly lower visual analog scale scores for pain at intraoperative time points T4 and T7. The mean arterial pressure was significantly lower in Group D at intraoperative times T6 -T8 and T11 -T12, as well as upon admission to the post -anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and 30 min after admission to the PACU. The results of the ANOVA tests revealed a significantly lower heart rate in Group D. The respiratory rate exhibited a notable decrease during time intervals T8 and T10 in the PF group. Conclusion: The administration of dexmetatomidine and propofol-fentanyl during colonoscopy was found to be safe. In addition, dexmetatomidine may present significant benefits in this context because of its lower occurrence of adverse respiratory events.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 67
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Patient-controlled Analgesia and Sedation With Alfentanyl Versus Fentanyl for Colonoscopy A Randomized Double Blind Study [J].
Usta, Burhanettin ;
Turkay, Cansel ;
Muslu, Bunyamin ;
Gozdemir, Muhammet ;
Kasapoglu, Benan ;
Sert, Huseyin ;
Demircioglu, Ruveyda Irem ;
Karabayirli, Safinaz .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 45 (07) :E72-E75
[42]   Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Conscious Sedation in Awake Craniotomy: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized, and Controlled Clinical Trial [J].
Shen, She-liang ;
Zheng, Jia-yin ;
Zhang, Jun ;
Wang, Wen-yuan ;
Jin, Tao ;
Zhu, Jing ;
Zhang, Qi .
ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2013, 47 (11) :1391-1399
[43]   Safety and efficacy of target-controlled infusion versus intermittent bolus administration of propofol for sedation in colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Cuiabano, Igor Seror ;
Garbin, Priscila de Miranda ;
Modolo, Norma Sueli Pinheiro ;
do Nascimento Junior, Paulo .
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 73 (06) :751-757
[44]   Midazolam and pethidine versus propofol and fentanyl patient controlled sedation/analgesia for upper gastrointestinal tract ultrasound endoscopy: A prospective randomized controlled trial [J].
Agostoni, M. ;
Fanti, L. ;
Arcidiacono, P. G. ;
Gemma, M. ;
Strini, G. ;
Torri, G. ;
Testoni, P. A. .
DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2007, 39 (11) :1024-1029
[45]   Intermittent manually controlled versus continuous infusion of propofol for deep sedation during interventional endoscopy: A prospective randomized trial [J].
Riphaus, Andrea ;
Geist, Christoph ;
Schrader, Kerstin ;
Martchenko, Ksenia ;
Wehrmann, Till .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 47 (8-9) :1078-1085
[46]   Comparison of effect of remimazolam and propofol on respiration of patients under deep sedation for colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial [J].
Wang, Zhengjia ;
Zhan, Renshu ;
Mo, Liqun ;
Zhang, Jin ;
Hu, Jie ;
Tan, Shoupeng ;
He, Qiongzhen ;
Li, Ping ;
Sun, Wekong ;
Wang, Xiaobin ;
Jiang, Jun ;
Liu, Li ;
Zhang, Yingying ;
Bai, Yiping .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2025, 30 (01)
[47]   Satisfaction and safety using dexmedetomidine or propofol sedation during endoscopic oesophageal procedures A randomised controlled trial [J].
Eberl, Susanne ;
Preckel, Benedikt ;
Bergman, Jacques J. ;
van Dieren, Susan ;
Hollmann, Markus W. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 33 (09) :631-637
[48]   Dexmedetomidine versus propofol in dilatation and curettage: An open-label pilot randomized controlled trial [J].
Sethi, Priyanka ;
Sindhi, Sunil ;
Verma, Ankita ;
Tulsiani, K. L. .
SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 9 (03) :258-262
[49]   Sedation with midazolam versus midazolam plus meperidine for routine colonoscopy: A prospective, randomized, controlled study [J].
Cinar, Kubilay ;
Yakut, Mustafa ;
Ozden, Ali .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 20 (04) :271-275
[50]   Sedative and analgesic effects of propofol-ketamine versus propofol-fentanyl for emergency department procedures [J].
Tajoddini, Shahrad ;
Motaghi, Mojdeh .
HONG KONG JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 29 (04) :212-219