Sedation for Colonoscopy Procedures Using Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol-Fentanyl Infusions: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:1
作者
Seyam, Sameh Hamdy [1 ]
Aboelsuod, Mohamed Abdelgawad Abdelhalim [1 ]
Ahmed, Ismail Mohamed Abdelgawad [1 ]
Hassan, Abdallah Elabd [1 ]
机构
[1] Al Azhar Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anaesthesiol Intens Care & Pain Management, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Colonoscopy; dexmedetomidine; outpatient sedation; perioperative care; propofol; sedation;
D O I
10.4274/TJAR.2024.231485
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: Different anaesthetists for sedation or monitored anaesthesia care have been used for colonoscopy. The target of this research was the ability to perform colonoscopy under a painless degree of sedation and the prevalence of undesired proceedings. Methods: A total of 60 patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group D received dexmedetomidine and Group PF received propofol-fentanyl. Patients in both groups received the same infusion ratio. The minimum infusion amount of dexmetatomidine is (0.1 to 0.4 mu g kg -1 h -1 ) in Group D, whereas fentanyl is administered at a rate of 0.01 to 0.05 mu g kg -1 min -1 in the PF group during the approximately 45 -min colonoscopy. Results: Group D exhibited significantly lower modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scores at intraoperative time points T1 -T12. Group D also exhibited significantly lower visual analog scale scores for pain at intraoperative time points T4 and T7. The mean arterial pressure was significantly lower in Group D at intraoperative times T6 -T8 and T11 -T12, as well as upon admission to the post -anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and 30 min after admission to the PACU. The results of the ANOVA tests revealed a significantly lower heart rate in Group D. The respiratory rate exhibited a notable decrease during time intervals T8 and T10 in the PF group. Conclusion: The administration of dexmetatomidine and propofol-fentanyl during colonoscopy was found to be safe. In addition, dexmetatomidine may present significant benefits in this context because of its lower occurrence of adverse respiratory events.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 67
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Electrophysiological differences of randomized deep sedation with dexmedetomidine versus propofol [J].
Servatius, Helge ;
Kueffer, Thomas ;
Erdoes, Gabor ;
Seiler, Jens ;
Tanner, Hildegard ;
Noti, Fabian ;
Haeberlin, Andreas ;
Madaffari, Antonio ;
Branca, Mattia ;
Duetschler, Sophie ;
Theiler, Lorenz ;
Reichlin, Tobias ;
Roten, Laurent .
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
[22]   Efficacy of Bispectral Index Monitoring During Balanced Propofol Sedation for Colonoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Yeon Hwa Yu ;
Dong Soo Han ;
Hyun Soo Kim ;
Eun Kyung Kim ;
Chang Soo Eun ;
Kyo-Sang Yoo ;
Woo Jong Shin ;
Seungho Ryu .
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2013, 58 :3576-3583
[23]   A comparison of ketamine-midazolam combination and propofol-fentanyl combination on procedure comfort and recovery process in pediatric colonoscopy procedures [J].
Saylan, Sedat ;
Akbulut, Ulas Emre .
PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 37 (02) :483-488
[24]   Efficacy of Bispectral Index Monitoring During Balanced Propofol Sedation for Colonoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Yu, Yeon Hwa ;
Han, Dong Soo ;
Kim, Hyun Soo ;
Kim, Eun Kyung ;
Eun, Chang Soo ;
Yoo, Kyo-Sang ;
Shin, Woo Jong ;
Ryu, Seungho .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2013, 58 (12) :3576-3583
[25]   Comparison of dexmedetomidine and propofol for conscious sedation in inguinal hernia repair: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial [J].
Wang, Hong-mei ;
Shi, Xiao-yu ;
Qin, Xia-rong ;
Zhou, Jia-li ;
Xia, Yan-fei .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 45 (02) :533-539
[26]   Initial loading of dexmedetomidine and continuous propofol sedation for prevention of delayed recovery A randomized controlled trial [J].
Nakagawa, Hikaru ;
Hanamoto, Hiroshi ;
Kozu, Fumi ;
Yokoe, Chizuko ;
Maegawa, Hiroharu ;
Kudo, Chiho ;
Niwa, Hitoshi .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 154 (11) :1008-1018.e2
[27]   Propofol-fentanyl versus propofol-ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in patients with trauma [J].
Aminiahidashti, Hamed ;
Shafiee, Sajad ;
Hosseininejad, Seyed Mohammad ;
Firouzian, Abulfazl ;
Barzegarnejad, Ayyub ;
Kiasari, Alieh Zamani ;
Kerigh, Behzad Feizzadeh ;
Bozorgi, Farzad ;
Shafizad, Misagh ;
Geraeeli, Ahmad .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 36 (10) :1766-1770
[28]   Sedation for Short Hemato-Oncologic Invasive Procedures in Children: Comparison of Propofol-Remifentanil and Propofol-Fentanyl [J].
Ince, Icten E. ;
Iyilikci, Leyla ;
Yilmaz, Sebnem ;
Gunes, Dilek ;
Akkus, Muhammed ;
Isguven, Duyguhan .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2013, 35 (02) :112-117
[29]   Dexmedetomidine-ketamine combination versus fentanyl-midazolam for patient sedation during flexible bronchoscopy: a prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial [J].
Apostolos, Frimas ;
Nikolaos, Zias ;
Charalampos, Martinos ;
Kyriakos, Karkoulias ;
Sotirios, Fouzas ;
Gregorios, Voyagis .
BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2024, 24 (01)
[30]   Comparison of propofol-nalbuphine and propofol-fentanyl sedation for patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial [J].
Peiqi Wang ;
Yan Chen ;
Ying Guo ;
Jiangbei Cao ;
Hong Wang ;
Weidong Mi ;
Longhe Xu .
BMC Anesthesiology, 22