The Role of Re-Appropriation in Open Design: A Case Study on How Openness in Higher Education for Industrial Design Engineering Can Trigger Global Discussions on the Theme of Urban Gardening

被引:0
作者
Ostuzzi, Francesca [1 ]
Conradie, Peter [1 ]
De Couvreur, Lieven [2 ]
Detand, Jan [1 ]
Saldien, Jelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Ind Syst Engn & Prod Design, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Appl Sci, Howest, Kortrijk, Belgium
来源
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN OPEN AND DISTRIBUTED LEARNING | 2016年 / 17卷 / 04期
关键词
open design; industrial design; co-design; DIY; community-based practice; reusability; learning objects; adaptation process; open education; INFORMATION; THINKING;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This case study explores the opportunities for students of Industrial Design Engineering to engage with direct and indirect stakeholders by making their design process and results into open-ended designed solutions. The reported case study involved 47 students during a two-weeks intensive course on the topic of urban gardening. Observations were collected during three distinctive phases: the co-design phase, the creation of an open design, and the sharing of these design solutions on the online platform Instructables.com. The open sharing of local solutions triggered more global discussions, based on several types of feedback: from simple questions to reference to existing works and from suggestions to critiques. Also, some examples of re-appropriation of the designed solutions were reported. These feedbacks show the possibilities for students to have a global vision on their local solutions, confronting them with a wider and more diverse audience. The case study shows, on the other hand, the difficulty in keeping students engaged in this global discussion, considering how after a few weeks the online discussions dropped to an almost complete silence. It is also very difficult with such online platforms to follow the re-appropriation cycles, losing the possibility of exploring the new local context where the replication/modification of the designed product occurred. The course's focus on open design is interesting from both the design and educational points of view. It implies a deep change in the teaching approach and learning attitude of students, allowing unknown peers to take part in the design process and fostering a global discussion starting from unique and local solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 144
页数:24
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [31] +TUO project: low cost 3D printers as helpful tool for small communities with rheumatic diseases
    Ostuzzi, Francesca
    Rognoli, Valentina
    Saldien, Jelle
    Levi, Marinella
    [J]. RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2015, 21 (05) : 491 - 505
  • [32] Piller F, 2005, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V10
  • [33] On the open design of tangible goods
    Raasch, Christina
    Herstatt, Cornelius
    Balka, Kerstin
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 2009, 39 (04) : 382 - 393
  • [34] DILEMMAS IN A GENERAL THEORY OF PLANNING
    RITTEL, HWJ
    WEBBER, MM
    [J]. POLICY SCIENCES, 1973, 4 (02) : 155 - 169
  • [35] Roozenburg N.F., 1995, PRODUCT DESIGN FUNDA, V2
  • [36] Schifferstein HNJ, 2008, INT J DES, V2, P1
  • [37] Schon Donald., 1983, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, V53, P160, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004]
  • [38] Seely Brown J., 2008, EDUCAUSE, P18
  • [39] Thackara J., 2011, Into the open. Open Design Now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive, P42
  • [40] RAPID PROTOTYPING - AN ALTERNATIVE INSTRUCTIONAL-DESIGN STRATEGY
    TRIPP, SD
    BICHELMEYER, B
    [J]. ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 1990, 38 (01): : 31 - 44