From Here to Theology: Response to Joshua Farris

被引：1

作者：

Priest, Stephen ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Oxford, Oxford, England

来源：

EIDOS-A JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY OF CULTURE | 2023年 / 7卷 / 04期

关键词：

Being; conditioning; consciousness; de-conditioning; determinism; existence; God; mind; now; philosophy; physicalism; science; self; soul; theology;

D O I：

10.14394/eidos.jpc.2023.0029

中图分类号：

G [文化、科学、教育、体育]; C [社会科学总论];

学科分类号：

03 ; 0303 ; 04 ;

摘要：

Joshua Farris usefully applies my distinction between conditioned and de -conditioned philosophy to some limits of science, and the disclosure of the soul. It is argued that further de -conditioning is conducive to answering the profound philosophical questions: What is it to be now? , and What is it to be? but these answers are only adequate when they entail the existence of God. It follows that physicalism, determinism, and naturalism are false, and that science (knowingly or unknowingly) presupposes theology.

引用

页码：5 / 13

页数：9

共 27 条

[1]

Barnes Jonathan., 1987, EARLY GREEK PHILOS

[2]

Bell John S, 1964, Phys. Phys. Fiz, V1, P195, DOI 10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195

[3]

Derrida Jacques., 1982, Margins of Philosophy, P109

[4]

Descartes Rene, 2016, Meditationes de Prima Philosophia

[5] Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? [J].

Einstein, A ;

Podolsky, B ;

Rosen, N .

PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1935, 47 (10) :0777-0780

[6]

Farris Joshua, 2021, The Routledge Companion to Idealism and Immaterialism, DOI [10.4324/9781003202851, DOI 10.4324/9781003202851]

[7]

Farris Joshua, 2023, The Origin of the Soul: A Conversation

[8] Emergent creationism: another option in the origin of the soul debate [J].

Farris, Joshua R. .

RELIGIOUS STUDIES, 2014, 50 (03) :321-339

[9]

Farris Joshua R, 2023, The Creation of Self: A Case for the Soul

[10]

Farris Joshua R, 2023, Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture, V7, P31, DOI [10.14394/eidos.jpc.2023.0022, DOI 10.14394/EIDOS.JPC.2023.0022]

← 1 2 3 →