Quantum Reachability Games

被引:2
作者
Liu, Wuniu [1 ]
Li, Zhihui [1 ]
Li, Yongming [1 ]
机构
[1] Shaanxi Normal Univ, Sch Math & Stat, Xian 710119, Peoples R China
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EMERGING TOPICS IN COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE | 2024年
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Games; Quantum mechanics; Quantum system; Game theory; Probabilistic logic; Matrices; Vectors; Optimal strategies; quantum game processes (QGPs); quantum Markov decision process (qMDP); quantum reachability games (QRGs);
D O I
10.1109/TETCI.2024.3419704
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The reachability of quantum games refers to the ability of two players to reach a certain subspace of Hilbert spaces in a quantum game modeled by a newly proposed quantum game process (QGP). We refer to this as quantum reachability games (QRGs). Reachability analysis is crucial in studying the strategic behavior and decision-making processes of players in quantum games, as it aids in devising optimal strategies to achieve desired objectives. In a QRG, players make decisions based on their quantum strategies related to decision epochs, which are represented by quantum operations or quantum measurements. We present an algorithm for evaluating two-player strategies, and investigate the optimal QRG for two players, where the goal of player 1 is to maximize his/her probability of reaching a given target subspace, while player 2 aims to minimize it. We show that any optimal QRG are determined, i.e., both of the two players have the same probability of winning in non-cooperative reachability games. Furthermore, our results also demonstrate that reachability games in the quantum world can be undecidable in certain cases. These findings are significantly distinct from those in the probabilistic or classical scenarios. Finally, we present three case studies, penny flipover, ambushing quantum walk and peer-to-peer scheme game on quantum network, to illustrate the potential applications and implications of QRGs.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   On the equivalence between non-factorizable mixed-strategy classical games and quantum games [J].
Iqbal, Azhar ;
Chappell, James M. ;
Abbott, Derek .
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2016, 3 (01)
[22]   Collective quantum games with Werner-like states [J].
Alonso-Sanz, Ramon .
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2018, 510 :812-827
[23]   Correlated equilibria of classical strategic games with quantum signals [J].
La Mura, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUANTUM INFORMATION, 2005, 3 (01) :183-188
[24]   Learning Mixed Strategies in Quantum Games with Imperfect Information [J].
Silva, Agustin ;
Zabaleta, Omar Gustavo ;
Arizmendi, Constancio Miguel .
QUANTUM REPORTS, 2022, 4 (04) :462-475
[25]   Stability and Stabilization of State-Based Games [J].
Wang, Jinhuan ;
Wu, Han .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2025, 55 (01) :609-619
[26]   Social Power Games in Concatenated Opinion Dynamics [J].
Wang, Lingfei ;
Chen, Guanpu ;
Bernardo, Carmela ;
Hong, Yiguang ;
Shi, Guodong ;
Altafini, Claudio .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2024, 69 (11) :7614-7629
[27]   Strategically Revealing Intentions in General Lotto Games [J].
Paarporn, Keith ;
Chandan, Rahul ;
Kovenock, Dan ;
Alizadeh, Mahnoosh ;
Marden, Jason R. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2024, 69 (08) :5396-5407
[28]   Complexity Limitations on One-turn Quantum Refereed Games [J].
Soumik Ghosh ;
John Watrous .
Theory of Computing Systems, 2023, 67 :383-412
[29]   Complexity Limitations on One-turn Quantum Refereed Games [J].
Ghosh, Soumik ;
Watrous, John .
THEORY OF COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2022, 67 (2) :383-412
[30]   Classical, quantum and non-signalling resources in bipartite games [J].
Brassard, Gilles ;
Broadbent, Anne ;
Haenggi, Esther ;
Methot, Andre Allan ;
Wolf, Stefan .
SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUANTUM-, NANO- AND MICRO-TECHNOLOGIES: ICQNM 2008, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, :80-+