Comparing risk factors and neonatal outcomes in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy between assisted reproductive technology and spontaneous conception

被引:1
|
作者
Yang, Jingwei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gao, Jing [4 ]
Zhou, Danni [1 ,2 ]
Ye, Hong [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Guoning [1 ,2 ]
Lian, Xuemei [3 ]
Zhang, Xiaodong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Ctr Reprod Med, Chongqing Key Lab Human Embryo Engn, Women & Childrens Hosp, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Clin Res Ctr Reprod Med, Chongqing Hlth Ctr Women & Children, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Med Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Management, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Stat, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[4] Chongqing Med Univ, Childrens Hosp, Chongqing, Peoples R China
关键词
in vitro fertilization; intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy; nomogram; pregnancy complications; spontaneous conception; total bile acids; OVARIAN HYPERSTIMULATION SYNDROME; BILE-ACID LEVELS; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; IMPACT; METABOLITES; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1002/ijgo.15878
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of the present study was to investigate the incidence of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) as well as neonatal outcomes between conception via in vitro fertilization (IVF) compared with spontaneous conception (SC) and screen the risk factors of ICP in IVF. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 4467 puerperae who conceived via IVF, and 28 336 puerperae who conceived spontaneously and linked the information from neonates. The general linear model (GLM), multivariate logistic regression analysis, a forest plot, and nomogram were used to assess impact factors and risk prediction. Results Logistic analysis adjusted for confounders revealed significant differences in the ICP rate of singleton delivery (4.24% vs 3.41%, adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.53, P = 0.025) and in groups with total bile acids (TBA) >= 40 and <100 mu mol/L (14.77% vs 10.39%, aOR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.06-1.63, P = 0.023) between IVF and SC. When we divided newborns into singleton and twins delivery, the GLM revealed a higher rate with Apgar score <7 (13.44% vs 3.87%, aOR = 3.85; 95% CI: 2.07-7.17, P < 0.001) and fetal distress for IVF in comparison with SC (19.32% vs 5.55%, OR = 3.48; 95% CI: 2.39-6.95, P < 0.001) in the singleton group. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, body mass index (BMI) (aOR = 1.29; P = 0.031), number of embryo transfers (ET) (single ET vs double ET, aOR = 2.82; P < 0.001), E-2 level on the ET day (aOR = 2.79; P = 0.011), fresh ET which compared with frozen ET (FET) (aOR = 1.45; P = 0.014), embryo stage (cleavage embryo vs blastocyst, aOR = 1.75; P = 0.009) and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) which compared with non-OHSS (aOR = 3.73; P = 0.006) were independent predictors of ICP. These predictive factors in the logistic regression model were integrated into the nomogram (C-index = 0.735; 95% CI: 0.702-0.764); for each patient, higher total points indicated a higher risk of ICP. Conclusion We observed that the ICP rate of singleton delivery was higher in IVF than in SC. In ICP patients, there were higher rates of neonatal Apgar score <7 and fetal distress in IVF than SC and found the predictors of ICP in IVF.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 672
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of triplet births - spontaneous versus assisted reproductive technology conception
    Morency, Anne-Maude
    Shah, Prakesh S.
    Seaward, P. Gareth R.
    Whittle, Wendy
    Murphy, Kellie E.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (06) : 938 - 943
  • [2] Pregnancy Complications and Neonatal Outcomes in Multiple Pregnancies: A Comparison between Assisted Reproductive Techniques and Spontaneous Conception
    Kaveh, Mahbod
    Ghajarzadeh, Mahsa
    Tanha, Fatemeh Davari
    Nayeri, Fatemeh
    Keramati, Zahra
    Shariat, Mamak
    Ghaheri, Azadeh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY & STERILITY, 2015, 8 (04) : 367 - 372
  • [3] Miscarriage on Endometriosis and Adenomyosis in Women by Assisted Reproductive Technology or with Spontaneous Conception: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Huang, Yangxue
    Zhao, Xianhong
    Chen, Yiyuan
    Wang, Jie
    Zheng, Weilin
    Cao, Lixing
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 2020
  • [4] The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Twin Pregnancies Complicated by Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy: a Retrospective Cohort Study
    Celik, Samettin
    Caliskan, Canan
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GEBURTSHILFE UND NEONATOLOGIE, 2021, 225 (01): : 34 - 38
  • [5] Prevalence, risk factors and adverse perinatal outcomes for Chinese women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a large cross-sectional retrospective study
    Wu, Kaiqi
    Yin, Binin
    Li, Shuai
    Zhu, Xiaojun
    Zhu, Bo
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2022, 54 (01) : 2966 - 2974
  • [6] Risk factors associated with cesarean section and adverse fetal outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy
    Kong, Chengcai
    Zhu, Zonghao
    Mei, Fenglin
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2023, 11
  • [7] Psychological stress and adjustment in pregnancy following assisted reproductive technology and spontaneous conception: A systematic review
    Gourounti, Kleanthi
    WOMEN & HEALTH, 2016, 56 (01) : 98 - 118
  • [8] Risk factors for adverse outcomes in spontaneous versus assisted conception twin pregnancies
    Luke, B
    Brown, MB
    Nugent, C
    Gonzalez-Quintero, VH
    Witter, FR
    Newman, RB
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 81 (02) : 315 - 319
  • [9] Risk factors for adverse fetal outcomes among women with early- versus late-onset intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy
    Jin, Jin
    Pan, Shi-lei
    Huang, Li-ping
    Yu, Yan-hong
    Zhong, Mei
    Zhang, Guo-wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2015, 128 (03) : 236 - 240
  • [10] Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and gestational diabetes: Protocol for a scoping review of associations, risk factors, and outcomes
    Abubakr, Karima
    Kennedy, Clare
    Al-Tikriti, Shahad
    O'Higgins, Amy C.
    Coveney, Ciara
    Hatunic, Mensud
    Higgins, Mary F.
    Sergi, Consolato
    Sergi, Consolato
    PLOS ONE, 2025, 20 (03):