Defining the minimal clinically important difference for IKDC and KOOS scores for patients undergoing tibial tubercle osteotomy for patellofemoral pain or instability

被引:0
|
作者
Retzky, Julia S. [1 ]
Shah, Aakash K. [1 ]
Neijna, Ava G. [1 ]
Rizy, Morgan E. [1 ]
Gomoll, Andreas H. [1 ]
Strickland, Sabrina M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Special Surg, Sports Med Inst, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
IKDC; KOOS; MCID; TTO; KNEE PAIN;
D O I
10.1002/jeo2.12115
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeThe aim of the present study is to define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for patients undergoing tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) for either (1) patellofemoral pain or (2) patellar instability.MethodsPatients undergoing TTO for either patellofemoral pain or patellar instability by one of two sports medicine fellowship-trained surgeons at a single institution between September 2014 and May 2023 were included in the study. IKDC and KOOS scores were collected preoperatively and minimum 1 year postoperatively. Distribution-based methods were used to calculate the MCID.ResultsSeventy-seven patients (82 knees) were included, with a median age of 29.3 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 22.2-36.3 years) and a median BMI of 24.5 kg/m2 [IQR: 22.3-28.3 kg/m2]. Fifty-seven patients (74%) were female, and there were 40 right knees (49%). The median time to IKDC and KOOS score was 1.8 and 1.7 years, respectively. Forty-five patients (46 knees) underwent TTO for patellofemoral instability, and 32 patients (36 knees) underwent TTO for patellofemoral pain. The MCID was 11.5 for IKDC, 10.2 for KOOS pain, 10.1 for KOOS symptoms, 9.9 for KOOS ADL, 14.2 for KOOS sport and 14.2 for KOOS QoL for patients undergoing TTO for patellofemoral pain. The MCID was 11.2 for IKDC, 10.1 for KOOS pain, 10.6 for KOOS symptoms, 10.2 for KOOS ADL, 16.0 for KOOS sport and 13.2 for KOOS QoL for patients undergoing TTO for patellar instability.ConclusionWe define the MCIDs for commonly used patient-reported outcome measures for patients undergoing TTO for either patellofemoral pain or patellar instability.Level of EvidenceLevel II.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the "Minimal Clinically Important Difference" (MCID) of the KOOS, KSS and SF-12 scores after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy
    Jacquet, Christophe
    Pioger, Charles
    Khakha, Raghbir
    Steltzlen, Camille
    Kley, Kristian
    Pujol, Nicolas
    Ollivier, Matthieu
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2021, 29 (03) : 820 - 826
  • [2] Evaluation of the “Minimal Clinically Important Difference” (MCID) of the KOOS, KSS and SF-12 scores after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy
    Christophe Jacquet
    Charles Pioger
    Raghbir Khakha
    Camille Steltzlen
    Kristian Kley
    Nicolas Pujol
    Matthieu Ollivier
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2021, 29 : 820 - 826
  • [3] Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Athletes Undergoing Arthroscopic Correction of Sports-Related Femoroacetabular Impingement: The Percentage of Possible Improvement
    Carton, Patrick
    Filan, David
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (01)
  • [4] Establishing Minimum Clinically Important Difference Thresholds for Physical Function and Pain in Patients Undergoing Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Nie, James W.
    Hartman, Timothy J.
    Zheng, Eileen
    Oyetayo, Omolabake O.
    MacGregor, Keith R.
    Federico, Vincent P.
    Massel, Dustin H.
    Sayari, Arash J.
    Singh, Kern
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 175 : E352 - E360
  • [5] Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation
    Chen, Poyu
    Lin, Keh-Chung
    Liing, Rong-Jiuan
    Wu, Ching-Yi
    Chen, Chia-Ling
    Chang, Ku-Chou
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (06) : 1585 - 1596
  • [6] Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation
    Poyu Chen
    Keh-Chung Lin
    Rong-Jiuan Liing
    Ching-Yi Wu
    Chia-Ling Chen
    Ku-Chou Chang
    Quality of Life Research, 2016, 25 : 1585 - 1596
  • [7] Minimal Clinically Important Difference for PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference in Patients Following Surgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture
    Hollenberg, Alex M.
    Hammert, Warren C.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2022, 47 (02): : 137 - 144
  • [8] Risk factors for failure to achieve minimal clinically important difference and significant clinical benefit in PROMIS computer adaptive test domains in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair
    Tramer, Joseph S.
    Yedulla, Nikhil R.
    Ziedas, Alexander C.
    Patel, Mit
    Franovic, Sreten
    Muh, Stephanie J.
    Makhni, Eric C.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2022, 31 (07) : 1416 - 1425
  • [9] "Minimal clinically important difference" estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program
    Benaim, Charles
    Blaser, Simon
    Leger, Bertrand
    Vuistiner, Philippe
    Luthi, Francois
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [10] “Minimal clinically important difference” estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program
    Charles Benaim
    Simon Blaser
    Bertrand Léger
    Philippe Vuistiner
    François Luthi
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20