Seismic Damage and Behavior Assessment of Drift-Hardening Concrete Walls Reinforced by LBUHS Bars

被引:0
|
作者
Che, Jiayu [1 ]
Son, Bunka [2 ]
Sun, Yuping [1 ]
机构
[1] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Engn, 1-1 Rokkodai cho, Kobe 6578501, Japan
[2] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Syst Informat, 1-1 Rokkodai cho, Kobe 6578501, Japan
关键词
drift-hardening concrete wall; LBUHS bar; seismic behavior; residual drift ratio; maximum strain capacity; PERFORMANCE; BUILDINGS; DESIGN; ROCKING;
D O I
10.3390/ma17092070
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This paper experimentally and analytically investigated the damage and seismic behavior of concrete walls reinforced by low-bond ultra-high-strength (LBUHS) bars. To this end, four half-scale rectangular concrete walls were fabricated and tested under reversed cyclic loading and constant axial compression. The test variables were the shear span ratio and the axial load ratio. Based on the test results, the propagation of cracks on the wall surface, the maximum strain capacity of concrete, the hysteresis loops and envelope curves, the residual drifts, and the strain distributions of LBUHS rebars were presented and discussed. The experimental results showed that all the test walls could exhibit drift-hardening capability until at least a 2.0% drift ratio if LBUHS rebars were anchored by nuts at their ends. The test results also indicated that the maximum strain capacity of concrete was above 0.86%, much larger than the currently recommended 0.4%. After unloading from the transient drift ratios of 2.0% and 2.5% for the walls with shear span ratios of 1.5 and 2.0, respectively, the measured residual drift ratios were controlled below 0.4%, which is less than the critical drift ratio (0.5%) having 98% repairable probability recommended in the FEMA document (P-58) for general concrete structures. Furthermore, a numerical method was presented to evaluate the cyclic response of the test walls, and a comparison between the experimental and the calculated results verified the reliability and accuracy of the proposed numerical method.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Study on Improvement for Seismic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls
    Chu, Mingjin
    Feng, Peng
    Ye, Lieping
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE INNOVATION, PTS 1-6, 2012, 368-373 : 1396 - +
  • [22] Seismic Fragility Assessment of Lightly Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls
    Sengupta, Piyali
    Li, Bing
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2016, 20 (05) : 809 - 840
  • [23] Effect of spiral transverse bars on structural behavior of concrete shear walls reinforced with GFRP bars
    Hosseini, Seyed Mohammad
    Yekrangnia, Mohammad
    Oskouei, Asghar Vatani
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2022, 55
  • [24] Seismic flexural behavior of concrete connections reinforced with CFRP bars and grids
    Sharbatdar, M. Kazem
    Saatcioglu, M.
    Benmokrane, B.
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2011, 93 (10) : 2439 - 2449
  • [25] Seismic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Corroded Deformed Reinforcing Bars
    Goksu, Caglar
    Ilki, Alper
    ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2016, 113 (05) : 1053 - 1064
  • [26] Seismic damage analysis for reinforced concrete core walls based on members
    Zheng, Shan-Suo, 1600, Chinese Vibration Engineering Society (33):
  • [27] Impact of physical seismic damage on the fire resistance of reinforced concrete walls
    Ni, Shuna
    Birely, Anna C.
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2018, 182 : 469 - 482
  • [28] Seismic Behavior of Concrete Bridge Piers Reinforced with Steel or GFRP Bars
    Stratford, Cain
    Palermo, Alessandro
    Scott, Allan
    JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 27 (02)
  • [29] Seismic Damage Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Grain Silos
    Benkhellat, Sonia
    Kada, Ouassila
    Seghir, Abdelghani
    Kadri, Mohammed
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL STABILITY AND DYNAMICS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [30] Seismic damage assessment of reinforced concrete bridge columns
    Kim, TH
    Lee, KM
    Chung, YS
    Shin, HM
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2005, 27 (04) : 576 - 592