Leveraging catchment scale automated novel data collection infrastructure to advance urban hydrologic-hydraulic modeling

被引:1
作者
Shrestha, Ashish [1 ]
Garcia, Margaret [1 ]
Doerry, Eck [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainable Engn & Built Environm, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[2] No Arizona Univ, Sch Informat Comp & Cyber Syst, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
FLOOD; UNCERTAINTY; CALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106046
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Lack of long-term hydrological observations in urban catchments presents a significant obstacle to advancing reliability and accuracy of urban flood models, as sensor-based depth, flow or velocity monitoring in stormwater drainage networks is costly and rarely available. Commonly available networked technologies e.g., traffic cameras and cell phones, collectively referred to as novel data sources, if properly leveraged, could provide a highquality, cost-effective source of urban hydrological observations. This proof-of-concept study utilizing experimental data collection infrastructure in Flagstaff, Arizona used remotely sensed flood-cameras based water depth time series and single point data, and citizens' contributed single point data for model parameterization. An approach to reduce the number of parameters while addressing spatial heterogeneity was applied before parameterization. The results demonstrate the reduced uncertainty and improved prediction accuracy from calibrated model even from a single event calibration, emphasizing the potential of novel data in advancing pluvial flood modeling in challenging urban contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 84 条
  • [11] Building level flood exposure analysis using a hydrodynamic model
    Bertsch, Robert
    Glenis, Vassilis
    Kilsby, Chris
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2022, 156
  • [12] Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods
    Boyle, DP
    Gupta, HV
    Sorooshian, S
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2000, 36 (12) : 3663 - 3674
  • [13] Carnell R., 2016, Package 'lhs'
  • [14] Flood and drought hydrologic monitoring: the role of model parameter uncertainty
    Chaney, N. W.
    Herman, J. D.
    Reed, P. M.
    Wood, E. F.
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2015, 19 (07) : 3239 - 3251
  • [15] City of Flagstaff, 2021, City of Flagstaff GIS open data portal
  • [16] Danish Hydraulic Institute (DHI), 2009, Flow Model: Hydrodynamic Module Scientific Documentation
  • [17] Continuity vs. the Crowd-Tradeoffs Between Continuous and Intermittent Citizen Hydrology Streamflow Observations
    Davids, Jeffrey C.
    van de Giesen, Nick
    Rutten, Martine
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 60 (01) : 12 - 29
  • [18] The potential of proxy water level measurements for calibrating urban pluvial flood models
    de Vitry, Matthew Moy
    Leitao, Joao P.
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2020, 175 (175)
  • [19] floodX: urban flash flood experiments monitored with conventional and alternative sensors
    de Vitry, Matthew Moy
    Dicht, Simon
    Leitao, Joao P.
    [J]. EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE DATA, 2017, 9 (02) : 657 - 666
  • [20] Dent S, 2004, J WATER MANAG MODELL, V32, P45, DOI [10.14796/JWMM.R220-18, DOI 10.14796/JWMM.R220-18]