Measuring and reducing implicit prejudice against Black women and people with intersectional identities

被引:0
作者
Phills, Curtis E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Florida, Jacksonville, FL USA
关键词
implicit prejudice; intersectionality; stereotyping; ASSOCIATION TEST; ATTITUDINAL AMBIVALENCE; RACIAL PREJUDICE; STEREOTYPES; RACE; BIAS; RELIABILITY; DISCOMFORT; CONFLICT; EXEMPLAR;
D O I
10.1111/spc3.12981
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This paper addresses a critical gap in measuring and reducing implicit prejudice: biases against Black women and people with intersectional identities. Though social psychologists have published many methods to measure and interventions to reduce implicit prejudice against Black people, these methods often target biases against Black people or Black men rather than Black women. Thus, these methods may leave Black women out because the mental representations of Black women and Black men differ and the mental representation of Black people is more similar to the mental representation of Black men than Black women. This paper advocates for an intersectional approach to measuring and reducing implicit prejudice that accounts for the unique prejudices faced by Black women. Specifically, this paper argues that researchers should tailor their methods to account for how the mental representations of Black women and Black men differ including differences in stereotypic content and ambivalence. The paper concludes by acknowledging the difficulties related to developing long-lasting interventions, the need to move beyond reducing implicit prejudice, and the value of studying the men and women of additional racial and ethnic groups and other intersections like sexual orientation and socioeconomic status.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Attitudinal ambivalence: A test of three key hypotheses [J].
Armitage, CJ ;
Conner, M .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2000, 26 (11) :1421-1432
[2]  
Axt J. R., 2023, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, V0, P871, DOI [10.1177/014616722211502, DOI 10.1177/014616722211502]
[3]   Simultaneous ingroup and outgroup favoritism in implicit social cognition [J].
Axt, Jordan R. ;
Moran, Tal ;
Bar-Anan, Yoav .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 79 :275-289
[4]   Intersectional Male-Centric and White-Centric Biases in Collective Concepts [J].
Bailey, April H. ;
Williams, Adina ;
Poddar, Aashna ;
Cimpian, Andrei .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2024,
[5]   Ambivalent Attitudes in a Communication Process: An Integrated Model [J].
Chang, Chingching .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2012, 38 (03) :332-359
[6]   Bias in the Air: A Nationwide Exploration of Teachers' Implicit Racial Attitudes, Aggregate Bias, and Student Outcomes [J].
Chin, Mark J. ;
Quinn, David M. ;
Dhaliwal, Tasminda K. ;
Lovison, Virginia S. .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2020, 49 (08) :566-578
[7]   Moderating role of attitudinal ambivalence within the theory of planned behaviour [J].
Conner, M ;
Povey, R ;
Sparks, P ;
James, R ;
Shepherd, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 42 :75-94
[8]  
Conner M., 2002, European Review of Social Psychology, V12, P37, DOI DOI 10.1080/14792772143000012
[9]  
Cvencek D., 2012, Cognitive consistency: A unifying concept in a social psychology, P157
[10]   On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals [J].
Dasgupta, N ;
Greenwald, AG .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 81 (05) :800-814