Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in the Treatment of Gastric Cancer: Feasibility, Efficacy and Safety-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:3
作者
Ramalho-Vasconcelos, Francisca [1 ]
Gomes, Raquel [1 ]
Bouca-Machado, Raquel [2 ]
Aral, Marisa [3 ]
Nogueiro, Jorge [3 ]
Bouca-Machado, Tiago [3 ]
Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Santos-Sousa, Hugo [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Fac Med, P-4200319 Porto, Portugal
[2] Inst Med Mol Joao Lobo Antunes, Edificio Egas Moniz,Ave Prof Egas Moniz, P-1649028 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Sao Joao Local Hlth Unit, Surg Dept, P-4200319 Porto, Portugal
[4] Univ Porto, Fac Med, MEDCIDS Dept Community Med Informat & Hlth Decis S, P-4200319 Porto, Portugal
[5] Univ Porto, CINTESIS Ctr Hlth Technol & Serv Res, P-4200319 Porto, Portugal
[6] Obes Integrated Responsibil Unit CRI O, Sao Joao Local Hlth Unit, P-4200319 Porto, Portugal
关键词
gastric cancer; gastric adenocarcinoma; stomach cancer; gastric neoplasm; peritoneal carcinomatosis; peritoneal metastasis; Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy; PIPAC; systematic review; meta-analysis; LOW-DOSE CISPLATIN; PERITONEAL METASTASIS; DOXORUBICIN; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13113320
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is an emerging technique for delivering chemotherapy directly to the peritoneum via a pressurized aerosol. Its growing attention stems from its effectiveness in treating peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) originating from various primary tumors, with gastric cancer (GC) being among the most prevalent. This study aimed to systematically investigate PIPAC's therapeutic role in gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis (GCPM). Methods: The systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching Pubmed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases. The meta-analysis of relative risks and mean differences compared patients undergoing one or two PIPAC sessions with those completing three or more, assessing various outcomes. Results: Eighteen studies underwent qualitative analysis, and four underwent quantitative analysis. Patients with three or more PIPAC procedures had shorter hospital stays (MD = -1.2; 95%CI (-1.9; -0.5); p < 0.001), higher rates of histopathological response (RR = 1.77, 95%CI 1.08; 2.90; p = 0.023), and significantly improved overall survival (MD = 6.0; 95%CI 4.2; 7.8; p < 0.001). Other outcomes showed no significant differences. Conclusions: PIPAC demonstrated efficacy in carefully selected patients, enhancing histopathologic response rates and overall survival without prolonging hospital stays. This study underscores the necessity for randomized controlled trials and precise selection criteria to refine PIPAC's implementation in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in ovarian cancer: a systematic review of current evidence
    Pavone, Matteo
    Jochum, Floriane
    Lecointre, Lise
    Bizzarri, Nicolo
    Taliento, Cristina
    Restaino, Stefano
    Vizzielli, Giuseppe
    Fagotti, Anna
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Querleu, Denis
    Akladios, Cherif
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2024, 310 (04) : 1845 - 1856
  • [2] 10 Years of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Di Giorgio, Andrea
    Macri, Antonio
    Ferracci, Federica
    Robella, Manuela
    Visaloco, Mario
    De Manzoni, Giovanni
    Sammartino, Paolo
    Sommariva, Antonio
    Biacchi, Daniele
    Roviello, Franco
    Pastorino, Roberta
    Pires Marafon, Denise
    Rotolo, Stefano
    Casella, Francesco
    Vaira, Marco
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [3] The role of Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy in the management of gastric cancer: A systematic review
    Garg, Pankaj Kumar
    Jara, Maximilian
    Alberto, Miguel
    Rau, Beate
    PLEURA AND PERITONEUM, 2019, 4 (01)
  • [4] Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy, reasons for interrupting treatment: a systematic review of the literature
    Ezanno, Anne-Cecile
    Malgras, Brice
    Pocard, Marc
    PLEURA AND PERITONEUM, 2023, 8 (02) : 45 - 53
  • [5] Systemic chemotherapy and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): A bidirectional approach for gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis
    Di Giorgio, Andrea
    Schena, Carlo Alberto
    El Halabieh, Miriam Attalla
    Abatini, Carlo
    Vita, Emanuele
    Strippoli, Antonia
    Inzani, Frediano
    Rodolfino, Elena
    Romano, Bruno
    Pacelli, Fabio
    Rotolo, Stefano
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2020, 34 : 270 - 275
  • [6] Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. A review of the literature
    Psomiadou, Victoria
    Fotiou, Alexandros
    Prodromidou, Anastasia
    Iavazzo, Christos
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 43 (01) : 73 - 77
  • [7] Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for unresectable peritoneal metastasis from gastric cancer
    Alyami, Mohammad
    Bonnot, Pierre-Emmanuel
    Mercier, Frederic
    Laplace, Nathalie
    Villeneuve, Laurent
    Passot, Guillaume
    Bakrin, Naoual
    Kepenekian, Vahan
    Glehen, Olivier
    EJSO, 2021, 47 (01): : 123 - 127
  • [8] Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) for Peritoneal Metastasis: A Registry Study
    Kurtz, Florian
    Struller, Florian
    Horvath, Philipp
    Solass, Wiebke
    Boesmueller, Hans
    Koenigsrainer, Alfred
    Reymond, Marc A.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2018, 2018
  • [9] Bidirectional treatment of peritoneal metastasis with Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) and systemic chemotherapy: a systematic review
    Ploug, Magnus
    Graversen, Martin
    Pfeiffer, Per
    Mortensen, Michael Bau
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [10] Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): updated systematic review using the IDEAL framework
    Baggaley, Alice E.
    Lafaurie, Guillaume B. R. C.
    Tate, Sophia J.
    Boshier, Piers R.
    Case, Amy
    Prosser, Susan
    Torkington, Jared
    Jones, Sadie E. F.
    Gwynne, Sarah H.
    Peters, Christopher J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 110 (01) : 10 - 18