Human Information Processing Shapes Language Change

被引:15
作者
Fedzechkina, Maryia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chu, Becky [4 ]
Jaeger, T. Florian [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Linguist, 1103 E Univ Blvd, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Grad Interdisciplinary Program Cognit Sci, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Grad Interdisciplinary Program Second Language Ac, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[4] Univ Rochester, Dept Brain & Cognit Sci, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
[5] Univ Rochester, Dept Comp Sci, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
[6] Univ Rochester, Dept Linguist, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
language universals; language processing; learning biases; language structure; language evolution; dependency length; open materials; WORD-ORDER; DEPENDENCY LENGTH; COMMUNICATION; COMPLEXITY; UNIVERSAL; GRAMMAR; INPUT; BIAS;
D O I
10.1177/0956797617728726
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Human languages exhibit both striking diversity and abstract commonalities. Whether these commonalities are shaped by potentially universal principles of human information processing has been of central interest in the language and psychological sciences. Research has identified one such abstract property in the domain of word order: Although sentence word-order preferences vary across languages, the superficially different orders result in short grammatical dependencies between words. Because dependencies are easier to process when they are short rather than long, these findings raise the possibility that languages are shaped by biases of human information processing. In the current study, we directly tested the hypothesized causal link. We found that learners exposed to novel miniature artificial languages that had unnecessarily long dependencies did not follow the surface preference of their native language but rather systematically restructured the input to reduce dependency lengths. These results provide direct evidence for a causal link between processing preferences in individual speakers and patterns in linguistic diversity.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 82
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CASE, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139164894.006
[2]   Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering [J].
Arnold, JE ;
Wasow, T ;
Losongco, A ;
Ginstrom, R .
LANGUAGE, 2000, 76 (01) :28-55
[3]  
Baker M.C., 2001, The atoms of language: The mind's hidden rules of grammar
[4]   In Search of On-Line Locality Effects in Sentence Comprehension [J].
Bartek, Brian ;
Lewis, Richard L. ;
Vasishth, Shravan ;
Smith, Mason R. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2011, 37 (05) :1178-1198
[5]  
Bates E., 1982, LANG ACQUIS, P173
[6]  
Chomsky Noam, 1965, Aspects of the theory of syntax
[7]   Language as shaped by the brain [J].
Christiansen, Morten H. ;
Chater, Nick .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2008, 31 (05) :489-+
[8]   SURFACE WORD-ORDER TYPOLOGY AND UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR [J].
COOPMANS, P .
LANGUAGE, 1984, 60 (01) :55-69
[9]  
Croft William., 2011, Linguistic Typology, V15, P433, DOI [10.1515/lity.2011.029, DOI 10.1515/LITY.2011.029]
[10]   Language learners privilege structured meaning over surface frequency [J].
Culbertson, Jennifer ;
Adger, David .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2014, 111 (16) :5842-5847