Navigating the Complexity of Generative AI Adoption in Software Engineering

被引:47
作者
Russo, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept Comp Sci, AC Meyers Vaenge 15, DK-152450 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Generative AI; large language models; technology adaption; empirical software engineering; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; USER ACCEPTANCE; PERCEIVED EASE; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; COMPUTER; JOBS;
D O I
10.1145/3652154
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This article explores the adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools within the domain of software engineering, focusing on the influencing factors at the individual, technological, and social levels. We applied a convergent mixed-methods approach to offer a comprehensive understanding of AI adoption dynamics. We initially conducted a questionnaire survey with 100 software engineers, drawing upon the Technology Acceptance Model, the Diffusion of Innovation Theory, and the Social Cognitive Theory as guiding theoretical frameworks. Employing the Gioia methodology, we derived a theoretical model of AI adoption in software engineering: the Human-AI Collaboration and Adaptation Framework. This model was then validated using Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling based on data from 183 software engineers. Findings indicate that at this early stage of AI integration, the compatibility of AI tools within existing development workflows predominantly drives their adoption, challenging conventional technology acceptance theories. The impact of perceived usefulness, social factors, and personal innovativeness seems less pronounced than expected. The study provides crucial insights for future AI tool design and offers a framework for developing effective organizational implementation strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:50
相关论文
共 121 条
[1]   A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology [J].
Agarwal, R ;
Prasad, J .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 1998, 9 (02) :204-215
[2]   Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? [J].
Agarwal, R ;
Prasad, J .
DECISION SCIENCES, 1999, 30 (02) :361-391
[3]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[4]   The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions [J].
Ajzen, Icek .
HUMAN BEHAVIOR AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 2 (04) :314-324
[5]  
Amazon Web Services, 2023, CodeWhisperer
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2023, ECONOMIST
[7]  
Baltes S, 2021, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:2002.07764, 10.48550/arXiv.2002.07764]
[8]  
Bandura A., 1997, SELF EFFICACY EXERCI, DOI [10.1891/08898391.13.2.158, DOI 10.1891/08898391.13.2.158]
[9]   Grounded Copilot: How Programmers Interact with Code-Generating Models [J].
Barke, Shraddha ;
James, Michael B. ;
Polikarpova, Nadia .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM ON PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES-PACMPL, 2023, 7 (OOPSLA)
[10]   Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI [J].
Barredo Arrieta, Alejandro ;
Diaz-Rodriguez, Natalia ;
Del Ser, Javier ;
Bennetot, Adrien ;
Tabik, Siham ;
Barbado, Alberto ;
Garcia, Salvador ;
Gil-Lopez, Sergio ;
Molina, Daniel ;
Benjamins, Richard ;
Chatila, Raja ;
Herrera, Francisco .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2020, 58 :82-115