Endocuff With or Without Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy in Detection of Colorectal Adenoma: A Randomized Colonoscopy Trial

被引:4
作者
Lui, Thomas Ka-Luen [1 ,2 ]
Lam, Carla Pui-Mei [2 ]
To, Elvis Wai-Pan [2 ,3 ]
Ko, Michael Kwan-Lung [2 ]
Tsui, Vivien Wai Man [2 ]
Liu, Kevin Sze-Hang [2 ]
Hui, Cynthia Ka-Yin [2 ]
Cheung, Michael Ka-Shing [1 ,2 ]
Mak, Loey Lung-Yi [1 ,2 ]
Hui, Rex Wan-Hin [2 ]
Wong, Siu-Yin [2 ]
Seto, Wai Kay [1 ,2 ]
Leung, Wai K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Li Ka Shing Fac Med, Sch Clin Med, Dept Med, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Med, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Tung Wah Hosp, Dept Med, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
endocuff; artificial intelligence; colonoscopy; colonic polyp; colonic adenoma; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; WHITE-LIGHT COLONOSCOPY; MISS RATE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.14309/ajg.0000000000002684
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION:Both artificial intelligence (AI) and distal attachment devices have been shown to improve adenoma detection rate and reduce miss rate during colonoscopy. We studied the combined effect of Endocuff and AI on enhancing detection rates of various colonic lesions. METHODS:This was a 3-arm prospective randomized colonoscopy study involving patients aged 40 years or older. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to undergo Endocuff with AI, AI alone, or standard high-definition (HD) colonoscopy. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR) between the Endocuff-AI and AI groups while secondary outcomes included detection rates of polyp (PDR), sessile serrated lesion (sessile detection rate [SDR]), and advanced adenoma (advanced adenoma detection rate) between the 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 682 patients were included (mean age 65.4 years, 52.3% male), with 53.7% undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy. The ADR for the Endocuff-AI, AI, and HD groups was 58.7%, 53.8%, and 46.3%, respectively, while the corresponding PDR was 77.0%, 74.0%, and 61.2%. A significant increase in ADR, PDR, and SDR was observed between the Endocuff-AI and AI groups (ADR difference: 4.9%, 95% CI: 1.4%-8.2%, P = 0.03; PDR difference: 3.0%, 95% CI: 0.4%-5.8%, P = 0.04; SDR difference: 6.4%, 95% CI: 3.4%-9.7%, P < 0.01). Both Endocuff-AI and AI groups had a higher ADR, PDR, SDR, and advanced adenoma detection rate than the HD group (all P < 0.01). DISCUSSION:Endocuff in combination with AI further improves various colonic lesion detection rates when compared with AI alone.
引用
收藏
页码:1318 / 1325
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Endocuff-assisted versus Cap-assisted Colonoscopy in Increasing Adenoma Detection Rate: a Meta-Analysis
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Buccino, Rosario Vincenzo
    Sacco, Rodolfo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL AND LIVER DISEASES, 2020, 29 (03) : 415 - 420
  • [42] Artificial intelligence-assisted adenoma detection in people with Lynch syndrome
    Burke, Carol A.
    Macaron, Carole
    Singh, Aparajita
    [J]. LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 9 (09): : 776 - 777
  • [43] Optimized computer-assisted technique for increasing adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
    Djinbachian, Roupen
    Taghiakbari, Mahsa
    Barkun, Alan
    Medawar, Edgard
    Alj, Abla
    Sidani, Sacha
    Kiow, Jeremy Liu Chen
    Panzini, Benoit
    Bouin, Mickael
    Lasfar, Dina
    von Renteln, Daniel
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2025, 39 (02): : 1120 - 1127
  • [44] Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy in Real-World Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wei, Mike Tzuhen
    Fay, Shmuel
    Yung, Diana
    Ladabaum, Uri
    Kopylov, Uri
    [J]. CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 15 (03) : E00671
  • [45] Artificial intelligence for colorectal neoplasia detection during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Lou, Shenghan
    Du, Fenqi
    Song, Wenjie
    Xia, Yixiu
    Yue, Xinyu
    Yang, Da
    Cui, Binbin
    Liu, Yanlong
    Han, Peng
    [J]. ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2023, 66
  • [46] Randomized controlled trial of EndoRings assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy
    Thayalasekaran, Sreedhari
    Bhattacharyya, Rupam
    Chedgy, Fergus
    Basford, Peter
    Subramaniam, Sharmila
    Kandiah, Kesavan
    Thursby-Pelham, Fergus
    Brown, James
    Alkandari, Asma
    Ellis, Richard
    Coda, Sergio
    Goggin, Patrick
    Amos, Mark
    Fogg, Carole
    Longcroft-Wheaton, Gaius
    Bhandari, Pradeep
    [J]. DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 35 (03) : 354 - 360
  • [47] Effect of artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy on the adenoma detection rate: A systematic review
    Mwango, Anson
    Akhtar, Tayyab Saeed
    Abbas, Sameen
    Abbasi, Dua Sadaf
    Khan, Amjad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION, 2024, 13 (03): : 65 - 73
  • [48] Artificial intelligence in colonoscopy from detection to diagnosis
    Kim, Eun Sun
    Lee, Kwang-Sig
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, 39 (04) : 555 - 562
  • [49] Artificial intelligence-assisted real-time monitoring of effective withdrawal time during colonoscopy: a novel quality marker of colonoscopy
    Lui, Thomas K. L.
    Ko, Michael K. L.
    Liu, Jing Jia
    Xiao, Xiao
    Leung, Wai K.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 99 (03) : 419 - 427.e6
  • [50] Effectiveness of artificial intelligence assisted colonoscopy on adenoma and polyp miss rate: A meta-analysis of tandem RCTs
    Maida, M.
    Marasco, G.
    Maas, M. H. J.
    Ramai, D.
    Spadaccini, M.
    Sinagra, E.
    Facciorusso, A.
    Siersema, P. D.
    Hassan, C.
    [J]. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2025, 57 (01) : 169 - 175