Endocuff With or Without Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy in Detection of Colorectal Adenoma: A Randomized Colonoscopy Trial

被引:4
作者
Lui, Thomas Ka-Luen [1 ,2 ]
Lam, Carla Pui-Mei [2 ]
To, Elvis Wai-Pan [2 ,3 ]
Ko, Michael Kwan-Lung [2 ]
Tsui, Vivien Wai Man [2 ]
Liu, Kevin Sze-Hang [2 ]
Hui, Cynthia Ka-Yin [2 ]
Cheung, Michael Ka-Shing [1 ,2 ]
Mak, Loey Lung-Yi [1 ,2 ]
Hui, Rex Wan-Hin [2 ]
Wong, Siu-Yin [2 ]
Seto, Wai Kay [1 ,2 ]
Leung, Wai K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Li Ka Shing Fac Med, Sch Clin Med, Dept Med, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Med, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Tung Wah Hosp, Dept Med, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
endocuff; artificial intelligence; colonoscopy; colonic polyp; colonic adenoma; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; WHITE-LIGHT COLONOSCOPY; MISS RATE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.14309/ajg.0000000000002684
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION:Both artificial intelligence (AI) and distal attachment devices have been shown to improve adenoma detection rate and reduce miss rate during colonoscopy. We studied the combined effect of Endocuff and AI on enhancing detection rates of various colonic lesions. METHODS:This was a 3-arm prospective randomized colonoscopy study involving patients aged 40 years or older. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to undergo Endocuff with AI, AI alone, or standard high-definition (HD) colonoscopy. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR) between the Endocuff-AI and AI groups while secondary outcomes included detection rates of polyp (PDR), sessile serrated lesion (sessile detection rate [SDR]), and advanced adenoma (advanced adenoma detection rate) between the 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 682 patients were included (mean age 65.4 years, 52.3% male), with 53.7% undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy. The ADR for the Endocuff-AI, AI, and HD groups was 58.7%, 53.8%, and 46.3%, respectively, while the corresponding PDR was 77.0%, 74.0%, and 61.2%. A significant increase in ADR, PDR, and SDR was observed between the Endocuff-AI and AI groups (ADR difference: 4.9%, 95% CI: 1.4%-8.2%, P = 0.03; PDR difference: 3.0%, 95% CI: 0.4%-5.8%, P = 0.04; SDR difference: 6.4%, 95% CI: 3.4%-9.7%, P < 0.01). Both Endocuff-AI and AI groups had a higher ADR, PDR, SDR, and advanced adenoma detection rate than the HD group (all P < 0.01). DISCUSSION:Endocuff in combination with AI further improves various colonic lesion detection rates when compared with AI alone.
引用
收藏
页码:1318 / 1325
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Artificial Intelligence With Other Interventions to Improve Adenoma Detection Rate for Colonoscopy
    Aziz, Muhammad
    Haghbin, Hossein
    Sayeh, Wasef
    Alfatlawi, Halah
    Gangwani, Manesh K.
    Sohail, Amir H.
    Zahdeh, Tamer
    Weissman, Simcha
    Kamal, Faisal
    Lee-Smith, Wade
    Nawras, Ali
    Sharma, Prateek
    Shaukat, Aasma
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 58 (02) : 143 - 155
  • [32] A prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial on artificial intelligence assisted colonoscopy for enhanced polyp detection
    Park, Dong Kyun
    Kim, Eui Joo
    Im, Jong Pil
    Lim, Hyun
    Lim, Yun Jeong
    Byeon, Jeong-Sik
    Kim, Kyoung Oh
    Chung, Jun-Won
    Kim, Yoon Jae
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [33] Role of Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy Detection of Advanced Neoplasias A Randomized Trial
    Mangas-Sanjuan, Carolina
    de-Castro, Luisa
    Cubiella, Joaquin
    Diez-Redondo, Pilar
    Suarez, Adolfo
    Pellise, Maria
    Fernandez, Nereida
    Zarraquinos, Sara
    Nunez-Rodriguez, Henar
    Alvarez-Garcia, Veronica
    Ortiz, Oswaldo
    Sala-Miquel, Noelia
    Zapater, Pedro
    Jover, Rodrigo
    CADILLAC Study Investigators
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2023, 176 (09) : 1145 - +
  • [34] Endo-wing versus transparent hood-assisted colonoscopy for colorectal adenoma detection: A randomized controlled trial
    Miyaguchi, Kazuya
    Tsuzuki, Yoshikazu
    Hirooka, Nobutaka
    Shiomi, Rie
    Ohgo, Hideki
    Nakamoto, Hidetomo
    Imaeda, Hiroyuki
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 37 (04) : 766 - 772
  • [35] Endocuff-assisted versus standard colonoscopy for improving adenoma detection rate: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    J. Wang
    C. Ye
    S. Fei
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2023, 27 : 91 - 101
  • [36] Endocuff-assisted versus standard colonoscopy for improving adenoma detection rate: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wang, J.
    Ye, C.
    Fei, S.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2023, 27 (02) : 91 - 101
  • [37] Endocuff-Assisted Colonoscopy-A Novel Accessory in Improving Adenoma Detection Rate: A Review of the Literature
    Patil, Rashmee
    Ona, Mel A.
    Ofori, Emmanuel
    Reddy, Madhavi
    CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 49 (06) : 533 - 538
  • [38] Endocuff-assisted colonoscopyversuscap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection rate: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Li, Ai
    Yang, Jing-Ze
    Yang, Xiao-Xiao
    Feng, Bing-Cheng
    Zhang, Ming-Ming
    Qu, Jun-Yan
    Zhou, Ru-Chen
    Wang, Peng
    Li, Li-Xiang
    Zuo, Xiu-Li
    Li, Yan-Qing
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 35 (12) : 2066 - 2073
  • [39] Effect of artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Huang, Ding
    Shen, Jingyi
    Hong, Jiaze
    Zhang, Yi
    Dai, Senjie
    Du, Nannan
    Zhang, Mengting
    Guo, Daxin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2022, 37 (03) : 495 - 506
  • [40] Assessing the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance colonoscopy adenoma detection in clinical practice: a prospective observational trial
    Ronborg, Soren Nicolaj
    Ujjal, Suresh
    Kroijer, Rasmus
    Ploug, Magnus
    CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2024, : 783 - 789