Oil and gas development influences potential for dust emission from the Upper Colorado River Basin, USA

被引:2
|
作者
Tyree, Gayle L. [1 ]
Chappell, Adrian [2 ]
Villarreal, Miguel L. [3 ]
Dhital, Saroj [4 ]
Duniway, Michael C. [1 ]
Edwards, Brandon L. [4 ]
Faist, Akasha M. [5 ]
Nauman, Travis W. [6 ]
Webb, Nicholas P. [4 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Southwest Biol Sci Ctr, 2282 SW Resource Blvd, Moab, UT 84532 USA
[2] Cardiff Univ, Sch Earth & Ocean Sci, Cardiff, Wales
[3] US Geol Survey, Western Geog Sci Ctr, Mountain View, CA USA
[4] USDA ARS, Jornada Expt Range, Las Cruces, NM USA
[5] Univ Montana, Dept Ecosyst & Conservat Sci, Missoula, MT USA
[6] USDA, NRCS Natl Soil Survey Ctr, Lincoln, NE USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
aeolian modelling; drought; dust emission; land cover change; oil and gas; wind erosion; WIND EROSION; ROUGHNESS ELEMENTS; ENERGY DEVELOPMENT; BROMUS-TECTORUM; IMPACTS; DESERT; DISTURBANCE; COVER; PRECIPITATION; CHEATGRASS;
D O I
10.1002/esp.5887
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Wind erosion and dust emission from drylands have large consequences for ecosystem function and human health. Wind erosion is naturally reduced by soil crusting and sheltering by non-erodible roughness elements such as plants. Land uses that reduce surface roughness and disturb the soil surface can dramatically increase dust emission. Extraction of oil and gas is a common and growing land use in the western United States (US) that removes vegetation and other roughness elements for construction of well pads and unpaved access roads, resulting in thousands of small (1-4 ha), discrete patches of unprotected soil. Here, we use a satellite albedo-based model to assess the effect of oil/gas activity on surface roughness in the Uinta-Piceance Basin, an area of the Upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB) with dense oil and natural gas development and modelled how the change in surface roughness could impact aeolian sediment flux and dust emission. We also investigated how regional drought influences the response of surface roughness to well pads and access roads. Oil/gas activity reduced surface roughness and increased modelled aeolian sediment flux at the landscape scale across much of the study region, resulting in a modest increase of 10 139 kg of dust per year, which is small relative to dust loads from a single regional dust event observed in the region, but downwind impact could be significant. The magnitude of surface roughness reductions by oil/gas activity was generally consistent among land cover types. However, in parts of the basin that had high cover of annual forbs and grasses, oil/gas activity was associated with larger surface roughness and smaller potential dust emission. Drought decreased surface roughness across disturbed and undisturbed sites, but there was no interactive effect of oil/gas activity and drought on surface roughness. These results suggest that oil/gas activity may increase sediment fluxes and likely contributes to dust emission from landscapes in the UCRB. Understanding how drought and land use change contribute to dust emissions will benefit mitigation of undesirable impacts of wind erosion and dust transport. Oil/gas activity in drylands tends to reduce land surface roughness, potentially increasing dust emissions. Annual plant invasion after oil/gas activity increases roughness and suppresses dust but is not immediate and may depend on precipitation. Increased dust from oil/gas activity may result in negative outcomes for regional ecosystems and human populations. image
引用
收藏
页码:3292 / 3307
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Identification of gas supersaturation sources in the upper Colorado River, USA
    Schisler, GJ
    Bergersen, EP
    REGULATED RIVERS-RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 1999, 15 (04): : 301 - 310
  • [2] Invasion of illegally introduced burbot in the upper Colorado River Basin, USA
    Gardunio, E. I.
    Myrick, C. A.
    Ridenour, R. A.
    Keith, R. M.
    Amadio, C. J.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ICHTHYOLOGY, 2011, 27 : 36 - 42
  • [4] Holocene extreme paleofloods and their climatological context, Upper Colorado River Basin, USA
    Liu, Tao
    Ji, Lin
    Baker, Victor R.
    Harden, Tessa M.
    Cline, Michael L.
    PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 44 (05): : 727 - 745
  • [5] Regional variability in dust-on-snow processes and impacts in the Upper Colorado River Basin
    Skiles, S. McKenzie
    Painter, Thomas H.
    Belnap, Jayne
    Holland, Lacey
    Reynolds, Richard L.
    Goldstein, Harland L.
    Lin, John
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2015, 29 (26) : 5397 - 5413
  • [6] Oil and gas development footprint in the Piceance Basin, western Colorado
    Martinez, Cericia
    Preston, Todd M.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 616 : 355 - 362
  • [7] Evaluating the Conservation Potential of Tributaries for Native Fishes in the Upper Colorado River Basin
    Laub, Brian G.
    Thiede, Gary P.
    Macfarlane, William W.
    Budy, Phaedra
    FISHERIES, 2018, 43 (04) : 194 - 206
  • [8] Canopy volume removal from oil and gas development activity in the upper Susquehanna River basin in Pennsylvania and New York (USA): An assessment using lidar data
    Young, John
    Maloney, Kelly O.
    Slonecker, E. Terrence
    Milheim, Lesley E.
    Siripoonsup, David
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 222 : 66 - 75
  • [9] Greenhouse gas emissions from building and operating electric power plants in the upper Colorado River Basin
    Pacca, S
    Horvath, A
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 36 (14) : 3194 - 3200
  • [10] Identification of Pacific Ocean sea surface temperature influences of Upper Colorado River Basin snowpack
    Aziz, Oubeidillah A.
    Tootle, Glenn A.
    Gray, Stephen T.
    Piechota, Thomas C.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2010, 46