Assessment of smallholder rice farmers' ' adaptation strategies to climate change in Kebbi state, Nigeria

被引:2
作者
Solaja, Sodipe [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kolawole, Ayorinde [1 ,3 ]
Awe, Toluwalase [2 ,3 ]
Oriade, Opeyemi [1 ,3 ]
Ayojimi, Wale [2 ,3 ]
Ojo, Ibukun [2 ,3 ]
Nayan, Gideon [4 ]
Adedayo, Ruth [3 ]
Etta-Oyong, Stephen [3 ]
Olasehinde, Faithfulness [3 ]
Asemokhai, Oluwatosin [3 ]
Nsikak, Isibietmfon [3 ]
机构
[1] Landmark Univ, SDG Zero Hunger Res Grp 2, Omu Aran, Kwara State, Nigeria
[2] Landmark Univ, SDG Climate Act Grp 13, Omu Aran, Kwara State, Nigeria
[3] Landmark Univ, Dept Agr Econ & Extens, Omu Aran, Kwara State, Nigeria
[4] Landmark Univ, Teaching & Res Farm, Omu Aran, Kwara State, Nigeria
关键词
Climate change; Adaptations; Intensity; Smallholder; Rice farmer; Nigeria; SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES; LAND FRAGMENTATION; SMART-AGRICULTURE; GANGETIC PLAINS; ADOPTION; AFRICA; WEST; FOOD; TECHNOLOGIES; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35384
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The future of food production in Nigeria where smallholding agriculture is prevalent is threatened by climate change. Despite the threats, Nigeria has no specific plan or policy to combat it. Therefore, understanding how smallholder farmers adjust to the changing climate and the factors that influence their adaptation choices will facilitate developing a policy to tackle climate change. This study therefore evaluates climate change adaptation techniques among smallholder rice farmers in Kebbi state, Nigeria. The study employs a simple random sampling technique to select 345 respondents. The data was analysed using multivariate probit and ordered probit regression. The findings revealed that marital status, literacy, farm size, farming experience, major occupation, extension visits, amount of credit, and access to climate information influenced adaptation strategy choice. Furthermore, marital status, literacy, household size, farm size, extension visits, and access to climate information are crucial drivers of adoption intensity. This study concludes that smallholder rice farmers in the study area adopt several practices to cope with climate change, however, farmers' intensity of adoption is low. This study recommends that stakeholders in the food systems in the study area should consider literacy, farm size, extension service, credits, and climate information in designing viable policies toward combating the vagaries of climate.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [1] Extension Agents' Awareness of Climate Change in Ethiopia
    Abegaz, Dagmawi M.
    Wims, Padraig
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION & EXTENSION, 2015, 21 (05) : 479 - 495
  • [2] Adebisi-Adelani O., 2014, International Journal of Vegetable Science, V20, P366, DOI 10.1080/19315260.2013.813890
  • [3] Adimassu Z., 2016, Environmental Systems Research, V5, P1, DOI DOI 10.1186/S40068-016-0065-2
  • [4] Akinbile C. O., 2011, Trends in Applied Sciences Research, V6, P1127, DOI 10.3923/tasr.2011.1127.1140
  • [5] Alarima C. I., 2018, Journal of Water and Land Development, P11
  • [6] Assessing farmer use of climate change adaptation practices and impacts on food security and poverty in Pakistan
    Ali, Akhter
    Erenstein, Olaf
    [J]. CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT, 2017, 16 : 183 - 194
  • [7] Climate change and indicators of probable shifts in the consumption portfolios of dryland farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for policy
    Amjath-Babu, T. S.
    Krupnik, Timothy J.
    Aravindakshan, Sreejith
    Arshad, Muhammad
    Kaechele, Harald
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 67 : 830 - 838
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2009, Second National Youth Policy Document of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 2009
  • [9] Arimi K., 2014, Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics, V115, P91
  • [10] Factors affecting the adoption of multiple climate-smart agricultural practices in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of India
    Aryal, Jeetendra Prakash
    Rahut, Dil Bahadur
    Maharjan, Sofina
    Erenstein, Olaf
    [J]. NATURAL RESOURCES FORUM, 2018, 42 (03) : 141 - 158