Optimizing photovoltaic thermal (PVT) collector selection: A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach for renewable energy systems

被引:8
作者
Hosouli, Sahand [1 ]
Gaikwad, Nachiket [2 ,3 ]
Qamar, Shabahat Hasnain [2 ]
Gomes, Joao [4 ]
机构
[1] Kingston Univ London, London, England
[2] MG Sustainable Engn AB, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
[4] Univ Gavle, Gavle, Sweden
关键词
MCDM; TOPSIS; VIKOR; Target based selection; PVT selection; TEMPERATURE; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27605
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In the realm of renewable energy systems, the effective selection of Photovoltaic Thermal (PVT) collectors is important. This study delves into the intricacies of choosing optimal PVT collectors available in the market, emphasizing the utility of Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methodologies. PVT collectors are differentiated based on various aspects such as their transparent front cover presence and the medium-liquid or air-used for heat transfer. The study methodologically identifies commercially available PVT collectors and establishes key performance indicators for comparison. Using an 11-point fuzzy scale, a weight matrix is determined. Subsequently, advanced MCDM techniques, including PROMETHEE II, TOPSIS, EDAS, and VIKOR, are employed to rank the alternatives. This research not only provides a systematic approach to PVT collector selection but also extends to a MATLAB-based tool for facilitating the process. The results underscore the value of the proposed methodologies in refining the selection of PVT collectors and their potential adaptability to other applications, such as PVT collector design.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   SYSTRA-SQ: a new measure of bank service quality [J].
Aldlaigan, AH ;
Buttle, FA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SERVICE INDUSTRY MANAGEMENT, 2002, 13 (3-4) :362-381
[2]  
Aruidoss M., 2013, Am. J. Inf. Syst, V1, P31
[3]  
Baggenstos Mellor, Existing PVT systems and Solutions
[4]   EDAS method for decision support modeling under the Pythagorean probabilistic hesitant fuzzy aggregation information [J].
Batool, Bushra ;
Abosuliman, Shougi Suliman ;
Abdullah, Saleem ;
Ashraf, Shahzaib .
JOURNAL OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE AND HUMANIZED COMPUTING, 2021, 13 (12) :5491-5504
[5]  
Bouyssou Denis, 2001, Outranking Methods, DOI [10.1007/978-0-387-74759-0495, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-74759-0495]
[6]  
Brans J. P., 1984, Operational Reseach '84. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference, P477
[7]   HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS - THE PROMETHEE METHOD [J].
BRANS, JP ;
VINCKE, P ;
MARESCHAL, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 24 (02) :228-238
[8]   A PREFERENCE RANKING ORGANIZATION METHOD - (THE PROMETHEE METHOD FOR MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING) [J].
BRANS, JP ;
VINCKE, PH .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1985, 31 (06) :647-656
[9]   Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for assessing thermal-energy storage in concentrated solar power (CSP) systems [J].
Cavallaro, Fausto .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2010, 87 (02) :496-503
[10]  
Chen S. J., 2022, FUZZY MULTIPLE ATTRI, V375, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4_5, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4_5]