Missing measurement data recovery methods in structural health monitoring: The state, challenges and case study

被引:81
作者
Zhang, Jianwei [1 ]
Huang, Minshui [1 ,3 ]
Wan, Neng [1 ]
Deng, Zhihang [1 ]
He, Zhongao [1 ]
Luo, Jin [2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Inst Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] Hubei Prov Engn Res Ctr Green Civil Engn Mat & Str, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 芬兰科学院;
关键词
Missing measurement data recovery; Structural health monitoring; Sensor science; Algorithms; Deep learning; Case study; DATA RECONSTRUCTION; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114528
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In the field of structural health monitoring (SHM), the sensor measurement signals collected from the structure are the foundation and key of the SHM system. However, the loss of sensor measurement signals can affect the accurate assessment of structural health. The restoration of missing measurement signals in SHM is a multidisciplinary research field. Therefore, analyzing the features of the measurement signals from multiple perspectives, establishing appropriate mathematical models, and selecting efficient algorithms is crucial to solving this problem. This article briefly reviews the latest research progress on restoring missing sensor measurement signals in SHM, using mathematical models as classification criteria, including finite element methods, sparse representation methods, statistical inference methods, and machine learning algorithms. At the end of this article, a study is conducted on an engineering case, and the development trend and challenges of restoring missing measurement sensor signals in SHM are presented from multiple perspectives in-depth.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Bayesian multi-task learning methodology for reconstruction of structural health monitoring data [J].
Wan, Hua-Ping ;
Ni, Yi-Qing .
STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2019, 18 (04) :1282-1309
[42]   Binary Segmentation for Structural Condition Classification Using Structural Health Monitoring Data [J].
Wan, Hua-Ping ;
Ni, Yi-Qing .
JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2019, 32 (01)
[43]   Fast unsupervised learning methods for structural health monitoring with large vibration data from dense sensor networks [J].
Entezami, Alireza ;
Shariatmadar, Hashem ;
Mariani, Stefano .
STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2020, 19 (06) :1685-1710
[44]   Structural health monitoring methods for flight safety [J].
Adams D.E. .
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2004, 4 (5) :9-14
[45]   Current Challenges with BIGDATA Analytics in Structural Health Monitoring [J].
Gulgec, Nur Sila ;
Shahidi, Golnaz S. ;
Matarazzo, Thomas J. ;
Pakzad, Shamim N. .
STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING & DAMAGE DETECTION, VOL 7, 2017, :79-84
[46]   Machine Learning for Structural Health Monitoring: Challenges and Opportunities [J].
Yuan, Fuh-Gwo ;
Zargar, Sakib Ashraf ;
Chen, Qiuyi ;
Wang, Shaohan .
SENSORS AND SMART STRUCTURES TECHNOLOGIES FOR CIVIL, MECHANICAL, AND AEROSPACE SYSTEMS 2020, 2020, 11379
[47]   Structural health monitoring of bridges in the State of Connecticut [J].
Chengyin Liu ;
Joshua Olund ;
Alan Cardini ;
Paul D’Attilio ;
Eric Feldblum ;
John DeWolf .
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2008, 7 :427-437
[48]   Structural health monitoring of bridges in the State of Connecticut [J].
Joshua Olund ;
Alan Cardini ;
Paul DAttilio ;
Eric Feldblum ;
John DeWolf .
EarthquakeEngineeringandEngineeringVibration, 2008, 7 (04) :427-437
[49]   Structural health monitoring of bridges in the State of Connecticut [J].
Liu, Chengyin ;
Olund, Joshua ;
Cardini, Alan ;
D'Attllio, Paul ;
Feldbium, Eric ;
DeWolf, John .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION, 2008, 7 (04) :427-437
[50]   An RMSprop-Incorporated Latent Factorization of Tensor Model for Random Missing Data Imputation in Structural Health Monitoring [J].
Yang, Jingjing .
ALGORITHMS, 2025, 18 (06)