Effect of Routine Child Physical Abuse Screening Tool on Emergency Department Efficiency

被引:1
|
作者
Shahi, Niti [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Meier, Maxene [4 ]
Reppucci, Marina L. [5 ]
Pickett, Kaci L. [4 ]
Phillips, Ryan [1 ,3 ]
McLean, Marissa [6 ]
Moulton, Steven L. [1 ,3 ]
Lindberg, Daniel M. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Colorado, Div Pediat Surg, Aurora, CO USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Surg, Worcester, MA USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Ctr Res Outcomes Childrens Surg, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[5] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Surg, New York, NY USA
[6] UCHealth Mem Hosp Cent, Colorado Springs, CO USA
[7] Edremit Devlet Hastanesi, Dept Emergency Med, Emergency Med, Balikesir, Turkiye
[8] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Kempe Ctr Prevent & Treatment Child Abuse & Neglec, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
关键词
screening; nonaccidental trauma; child abuse; OCCULT HEAD-INJURY; ECONOMIC BURDEN; UNITED-STATES; MALTREATMENT; TRAUMA;
D O I
10.1097/PEC.0000000000003205
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives Physical abuse is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality for children. Routine screening by emergency nurses has been proposed to improve recognition, but the effect on emergency department (ED) workflow has not yet been assessed. We sought to evaluate the feasibility of routine screening and its effect on length of stay in a network of general EDs. Methods A 2-question child physical abuse screening tool was deployed for children <6 years old who presented for care in a system of 27 general EDs. Data were compared for the 6 months before and after screening was deployed (4/1/2019-10/2/2019 vs 10/3/2019-3/31/2020). The main outcome was ED length of stay in minutes. Results There were 14,133 eligible visits in the prescreening period and 16,993 in the screening period. Screening was completed for 13,404 visits (78.9%), with 116 (0.7%) screening positive. The mean ED length of stay was not significantly different in the prescreening (95.9 minutes) and screening periods (95.2 minutes; difference, 0.7 minutes; 95% CI, -1.5, 2.8). Among those who screened positive, 29% were reported to child protective services. On multivariable analysis, implementation of the screening tool did not impact overall ED length of stay. There were no significant differences in resource utilization between the prescreening and screening periods. Conclusions Routine screening identifies children at high risk of physical abuse without increasing ED length of stay or resource utilization. Next steps will include determining rates of subsequent serious physical abuse in children with or without routine screening.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 514
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Home accident or physical abuse: Evaluation of younger children presenting with trauma, burn and poisoning in the Pediatric Emergency Department
    Isiyel, Emel
    Teksam, Ozlem
    Foto-Ozdemir, Dilsad
    Ozmert, Elif
    Tumer, Ali Riza
    Kale, Gulsev
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2018, 60 (06) : 625 - 632
  • [42] Response to child abuse in the pediatric emergency department: Need for continued education
    Wright, RJ
    Wright, RO
    Farnan, L
    Isaac, NE
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 1999, 15 (06) : 376 - 382
  • [43] Child abuse in the Emergency department: Epidemiology, management, and follow-up
    Solis-Garcia, Gonzalo
    Maranon, Rafael
    Medina Munoz, Maria
    de Lucas Volle, Sara
    Garcia-Morin, Marina
    Rivas Garcia, Aristides
    ANALES DE PEDIATRIA, 2019, 91 (01): : 37 - 41
  • [44] Evaluation of the effect of the child protection act on serious child physical abuse in Taiwan
    Chou, I-Jun
    Kong, Shu-Sing
    Chung, Ting-Ting
    See, Lai-Chu
    Kuo, Chang-Fu
    Lin, Jainn-Jim
    Wang, Huei-Shyong
    Lin, Kuang-Lin
    Hung, Po-Cheng
    CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2019, 95
  • [45] The Impact of an Emergency Department Bruising Pathway on Disparities in Child Abuse Evaluation
    Crumm, Caitlin E.
    Brown, Emily C. B.
    Vora, Surabhi B.
    Lowry, Sarah
    Schlatter, Adrienne
    Rutman, Lori E.
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2023, 39 (08) : 580 - 585
  • [46] Comparison of Targeted and Routine Adolescent HIV Screening in a Pediatric Emergency Department
    Gutman, Colleen K.
    Newton, Naomi
    Duda, Elizabeth
    Alevy, Ryan
    Palmer, Katherine
    Wetzel, Martha
    Figueroa, Janet
    Griffiths, Mark
    Koyama, Atsuko
    Middlebrooks, Lauren
    Camacho-Gonzalez, Andres
    Morris, Claudia R.
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2022, 38 (10) : E1613 - E1619
  • [47] Support and monitoring of families after child abuse detection based on parental characteristics at the Emergency Department
    Diderich, H. M.
    Pannebakker, F. D.
    Dechesne, M.
    Buitendijk, S. E.
    Oudesluys-Murphy, A. M.
    CHILD CARE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 41 (02) : 194 - 202
  • [48] Lactate as a Screening Tool for Critical Illness in a Pediatric Emergency Department
    Nygaard, Ulrikka
    Dungu, Kia Hee Schultz
    von Linstow, Marie-Louise
    Lundstrom, Kaare
    Zhang, He
    Vissing, Nadja Hawwa
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2023, 39 (10) : 735 - 738
  • [49] A SCREENING TOOL TO MEDICALLY CLEAR PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
    Shah, Sachin J.
    Fiorito, Michael
    McNamara, Robert M.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 43 (05) : 871 - 875
  • [50] Association of Expanded Child Tax Credit Payments With Child Abuse and Neglect Emergency Department Visits
    Bullinger, Lindsey Rose
    Boy, Angela
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (02) : E2255639