Effect of Routine Child Physical Abuse Screening Tool on Emergency Department Efficiency

被引:1
|
作者
Shahi, Niti [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Meier, Maxene [4 ]
Reppucci, Marina L. [5 ]
Pickett, Kaci L. [4 ]
Phillips, Ryan [1 ,3 ]
McLean, Marissa [6 ]
Moulton, Steven L. [1 ,3 ]
Lindberg, Daniel M. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Colorado, Div Pediat Surg, Aurora, CO USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Surg, Worcester, MA USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Ctr Res Outcomes Childrens Surg, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[5] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Surg, New York, NY USA
[6] UCHealth Mem Hosp Cent, Colorado Springs, CO USA
[7] Edremit Devlet Hastanesi, Dept Emergency Med, Emergency Med, Balikesir, Turkiye
[8] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Kempe Ctr Prevent & Treatment Child Abuse & Neglec, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
关键词
screening; nonaccidental trauma; child abuse; OCCULT HEAD-INJURY; ECONOMIC BURDEN; UNITED-STATES; MALTREATMENT; TRAUMA;
D O I
10.1097/PEC.0000000000003205
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives Physical abuse is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality for children. Routine screening by emergency nurses has been proposed to improve recognition, but the effect on emergency department (ED) workflow has not yet been assessed. We sought to evaluate the feasibility of routine screening and its effect on length of stay in a network of general EDs. Methods A 2-question child physical abuse screening tool was deployed for children <6 years old who presented for care in a system of 27 general EDs. Data were compared for the 6 months before and after screening was deployed (4/1/2019-10/2/2019 vs 10/3/2019-3/31/2020). The main outcome was ED length of stay in minutes. Results There were 14,133 eligible visits in the prescreening period and 16,993 in the screening period. Screening was completed for 13,404 visits (78.9%), with 116 (0.7%) screening positive. The mean ED length of stay was not significantly different in the prescreening (95.9 minutes) and screening periods (95.2 minutes; difference, 0.7 minutes; 95% CI, -1.5, 2.8). Among those who screened positive, 29% were reported to child protective services. On multivariable analysis, implementation of the screening tool did not impact overall ED length of stay. There were no significant differences in resource utilization between the prescreening and screening periods. Conclusions Routine screening identifies children at high risk of physical abuse without increasing ED length of stay or resource utilization. Next steps will include determining rates of subsequent serious physical abuse in children with or without routine screening.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 514
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Routine Emergency Department Screening to Decrease Subsequent Physical Abuse
    Lindberg, Daniel M.
    Peterson, Ryan A.
    Orsi-Hunt, Rebecca
    Chen, Pang Ching Bobby
    Kille, Briana
    Rademacher, Jacob G.
    Hensen, Colin
    Listman, David
    Ong, Toan C.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 84 (06) : 628 - 638
  • [2] IMPLEMENTATION OF A COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM TO IMPROVE CHILD PHYSICAL ABUSE SCREENING AND DETECTION IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
    Carson, Sheri M.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY NURSING, 2018, 44 (06) : 576 - 581
  • [3] Development of the Red Flag Scorecard Screening Tool for Identification of Child Physical Abuse in the Emergency Department
    Naik-Mathuria, Bindi
    Johnson, Brittany L.
    Todd, Hannah F.
    Donaruma-Kwoh, Marcella
    Bachim, Angela
    Rubalcava, Daniel
    Vogel, Adam M.
    Chen, Liang
    Escobar, Mauricio A.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2023, 58 (09) : 1789 - 1795
  • [4] Development of screening tool for child abuse in the korean emergency department Using modified Delphi study
    Paek, So Hyun
    Jung, Jin Hee
    Kwak, Young Ho
    Kim, Do Kyun
    Ryu, Jeong Min
    Noh, Hyun
    Kyong, Yeon Young
    Kang, Young Joon
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (51)
  • [5] Facilitators and barriers to screening for child abuse in the emergency department
    Louwers, Eveline C. F. M.
    Korfage, Ida J.
    Affourtit, Marjo J.
    De Koning, Harry J.
    Moll, Henriette A.
    BMC PEDIATRICS, 2012, 12
  • [6] Facilitators and barriers to screening for child abuse in the emergency department
    Eveline CFM Louwers
    Ida J Korfage
    Marjo J Affourtit
    Harry J De Koning
    Henriëtte A Moll
    BMC Pediatrics, 12
  • [7] Screening for Child Abuse in the Emergency Department of Academic Hospital Paramaribo in Suriname
    Schattenkerk, L. D. Eeftinck
    Loos, M. H. J.
    Schouten, M. C. M.
    Cheuk-Alam, I
    Bakx, R.
    Lissone, N. P. A.
    GLOBAL PEDIATRIC HEALTH, 2024, 11
  • [8] A validated Screening instrument for Child Abuse and Neglect (SCAN) at the emergency department
    Hoedeman, F.
    Puiman, P. J.
    van den Heuvel, E. A. L.
    Affourtit, M. J.
    Bakx, R.
    Langendam, M. W.
    van de Putte, E. M.
    Russel-Kampschoer, I. M. B.
    Schouten, M. C. M.
    Teeuw, A. H.
    de Koning, H. J.
    Moll, H. A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2023, 182 (01) : 79 - 87
  • [9] Emergency Department Evaluation of Child Abuse
    Leetch, Aaron N.
    Woolridge, Dale
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 31 (03) : 853 - +
  • [10] PARENTS' OPINION ABOUT A ROUTINE HEAD-TO-TOE EXAMINATION OF CHILDREN AS A SCREENING INSTRUMENT FOR CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT IN CHILDREN VISITING THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
    Teeuw, Arianne Helene
    van Konijnenburg, Eva M. Hoytema
    Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn, Tessa
    Molenaar, Sjaak
    Heymans, Hugo S.
    van Rijn, Rick R.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY NURSING, 2016, 42 (02) : 128 - 138