Are Rural Areas Holdouts in the Second Demographic Transition? Evidence From Canada and the United States

被引:3
作者
Clark, Shelley [1 ]
Brooks, Mat thew M. [1 ]
Helou, Ann -Marie [2 ]
Margolis, Rachel [3 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Sociol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Florida State Univ, Dept Sociol, Tallahassee, FL USA
[3] Western Univ, Dept Sociol, London, ON, Canada
关键词
Second demographic transition; Family change; Rural sociology; Canada; United States; FAMILY-STRUCTURE; NONMARITAL CONCEPTION; EDUCATIONAL GRADIENT; FERTILITY; POVERTY; COHABITATION; URBAN; PATTERNS; MARRIAGE; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1215/00703370-11237867
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
A central premise of the first demo graphic tran sition the ory is that demographic change would occur more slowly in rural than urban areas. Few stud ies, how ever, have inves ti gated whether rural areas remain hold outs during the sec ond demo graphic tran sition. To address this gap, this study (1) examines trends among rural and urban fami lies in Canada and the United States over a 30year period and (2) determines whether compo si tional differences in demo graphic, socio eco nomic, and reli gious factors explain current differences between rural and urban fami lies. We find that rural Canadian women continue to have, on average, 0.6 more chil dren than urban women. However, rural fami lies do not trail behind urban fami lies on any other indi cator of family change. In fact, rural women in both countries are now signifi cantly more likely to cohabit and roughly 10 percent age points more likely to have chil dren out side of marriage than urban women. These differences are largely explained by lower lev els of education and income among rural Ameri can women and fewer immi grants in rural Canada. Examining family change through a rural-urban lens fills important empirical gaps and yields novel insights into current debates on the fundamental causes of on going family change in highincome countries.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 568
页数:28
相关论文
共 84 条
  • [1] Albrecht DE, 1996, RURAL SOCIOL, V61, P446, DOI 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1996.tb00628.x
  • [2] Metro/Nonmetro residence, nonmarital conception, and conception outcomes
    Albrecht, DE
    Albrecht, CM
    [J]. RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 2004, 69 (03) : 430 - 452
  • [3] Albrecht DE, 2000, RURAL SOCIOL, V65, P87, DOI 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2000.tb00344.x
  • [4] Rural/Urban Differences: Persistence or Decline☆
    Albrecht, Don E.
    [J]. RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 2022, 87 (04) : 1137 - 1154
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, 2010 Standard for Delineating Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas, 75F.R.37246 (Notice from the Office of Management and Budget, June 28, 2010)
  • [6] Batty S., 2022, ANN M CAN POP SOC
  • [7] Family Policies in Quebec and the Rest of Canada: Implications for Fertility, Child-Care, Women's Paid Work, and Child Development Indicators
    Beaujot, Roderic
    Du, Ching Jiangqin
    Ravanera, Zenaida
    [J]. CANADIAN PUBLIC POLICY-ANALYSE DE POLITIQUES, 2013, 39 (02): : 221 - 239
  • [8] Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions
    Bongaarts, J
    Watkins, SC
    [J]. POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 1996, 22 (04) : 639 - +
  • [9] Brooks M. M., 2020, National symposium on family issues: Vol. 10. Rural families and communities in the United States: Facing challenges and leveraging opportunities, V10, P253
  • [10] Carson Jessica A., 2014, RURAL AM GLOBALIZING, P347