Openness and innovation in the US: Collaboration form, idea generation and implementation

被引:111
作者
Walsh, John P. [1 ]
Lee, You-Na [1 ]
Nagaoka, Sadao [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Tokyo Keizai Univ, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Res Inst Econ Trade & Ind, Tokyo, Japan
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Open invention; Innovation; Collaboration heterogeneity; University-industry collaboration; Vertical collaboration; DEVELOPMENT CONSORTIA; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; KNOWLEDGE; PERFORMANCE; NETWORKS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY; INDUSTRY; DIVERSITY; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.013
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Much current work in management of innovation argues that it is becoming increasingly necessary for inventors and their firms to exploit information and capabilities outside the firm in order to combine one's own resources with resources from the external environment. Building on this prior work, we examine the relationship between collaboration and innovation. Using detailed information on a sample of triadic patents, with over 1900 responses in the US, we report on the rates of collaboration of various forms, and test the effects of collaboration. Our results suggest that just over 10% of inventions involve an external co-inventor and about 23% involve external (non-co-inventor) collaborators (with 27% involving any external collaborators). We find evidence that heterogeneous collaboration and university-industry collaboration in inventing drive higher invention quality. However, vertical collaboration at the inventing stage is relatively more critical to commercialization at the implementation stage than is university-industry collaboration. These results suggest that the impact of different forms of collaborative innovation may vary depending on the stage of the innovation process. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 183
页数:12
相关论文
共 79 条
[41]   Autarkic drug discovery in Japanese pharmaceutical companies: insights into national differences in industrial innovation [J].
Kneller, R .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2003, 32 (10) :1805-1827
[42]  
Kubota T., 2011, INFLUENCE DISTANCE D
[43]   Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms [J].
Laursen, K ;
Salter, A .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (02) :131-150
[44]   Creativity in scientific teams: Unpacking novelty and impact [J].
Lee, You-Na ;
Walsh, John P. ;
Wang, Jian .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2015, 44 (03) :684-697
[45]   INNOVATION OBJECTIVES, KNOWLEDGE SOURCES, AND THE BENEFITS OF BREADTH [J].
Leiponen, Aija ;
Helfat, Constance E. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (02) :224-236
[46]   R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from French CIS data [J].
Lhuillery, Stephane ;
Pfister, Etienne .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (01) :45-57
[47]   LEARNING FROM OPENNESS: THE DYNAMICS OF BREADTH IN EXTERNAL INNOVATION LINKAGES [J].
Love, James H. ;
Roper, Stephen ;
Vahter, Priit .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (11) :1703-1716
[48]   Commercializing generic technology: The case of advanced materials ventures [J].
Maine, E ;
Garnsey, E .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (03) :375-393
[49]   EXPLORATION AND EXPLOITATION IN ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING [J].
March, James G. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1991, 2 (01) :71-87
[50]  
Miller DJ, 2007, ACAD MANAGE J, V50, P308, DOI [10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634437, 10.5465/20159856]