Right gastroepiploic artery length determined anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a prospective cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Kun-Kun [1 ]
Wang, Ying-Jian [1 ]
Zhang, Tai-Ming [1 ]
Zhang, Liang [1 ]
Zhao, Shu-Lin [1 ]
Chen, Liang [1 ]
Bao, Tao [1 ]
Zhao, Xiao-Long [1 ]
Xie, Xian-Feng [1 ]
Guo, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Army Med Univ, Daping Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, Chongqing 400042, Peoples R China
关键词
anastomotic leakage; esophageal cancer; minimally invasive esophagectomy; right gastroepiploic artery; VASCULAR ANATOMY; GASTRIC TUBE; IVOR-LEWIS; STOMACH; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/JS9.0000000000001181
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:This prospective cohort study, conducted at a high-volume esophageal cancer center from July 2019 to July 2022, aimed to investigate the link between the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) length and anastomotic leakage (AL) rates following minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Real-world data on stomach blood supply in the Chinese population were examined.Materials and Methods:A total of 516 cases were enrolled, categorized into two groups based on the Youden index-determined optimal cut-off value for the relative length of RGEA (length of RGEA/length of gastric conduit, 64.69%) through ROC analysis: Group SR (short RGEA) and Group LR (long RGEA). The primary observation parameter was the relationship between AL incidence and the ratio of direct blood supply from RGEA. Secondary parameters included the mean length of the right gastroepiploic artery, greater curvature, and the connection type between right and left gastroepiploic vessels. Patient data were prospectively recorded in electronic case report forms.Results:The study revealed median lengths of 43.60 cm for greater curvature, 43.16 cm for the gastric conduit, and 26.75 cm for RGEA. AL, the most common postoperative complication, showed a significant difference between groups (16.88 vs. 8.84%, P=0.01). Multivariable binary logistic regression identified Group SR and LR (odds ratio: 2.651, 95% CI: 1.124-6.250, P=0.03) and Neoadjuvant therapy (odds ratio: 2.479, 95% CI: 1.374-4.473, P=0.00) as independent predictors of AL.Conclusions:The study emphasizes the crucial role of RGEA length in determining AL incidence in MIE for esophageal cancer. Preserving RGEA and fostering capillary arches between RGEA and LGEA are recommended strategies to mitigate AL risk.
引用
收藏
页码:2757 / 2764
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Air Bubble Sign: ANew Screening Method for Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
    Yoshiaki Shoji
    Hiroya Takeuchi
    Yuko Kitagawa
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 25 : 713 - 714
  • [42] Ulcer Scarring in the Gastric Conduit Is a Risk Factor for Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
    Daisuke Motegi
    Hiroshi Ichikawa
    Takeo Bamba
    Yusuke Muneoka
    Yosuke Kano
    Kenji Usui
    Takaaki Hanyu
    Takashi Ishikawa
    Yuki Hirose
    Kohei Miura
    Yosuke Tajima
    Yoshifumi Shimada
    Jun Sakata
    Satoru Nakagawa
    Shin-ichi Kosugi
    Toshifumi Wakai
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2023, 27 : 250 - 261
  • [43] Air Bubble Sign: A New Screening Method for Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
    Yoshiaki Shoji
    Hiroya Takeuchi
    Kazumasa Fukuda
    Rieko Nakamura
    Norihito Wada
    Hirofumi Kawakubo
    Yuko Kitagawa
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 25 : 1061 - 1068
  • [44] Preoperative C-reactive protein to albumin ratio predicts anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study
    Atsushi Sugimoto
    Takahiro Toyokawa
    Yuichiro Miki
    Mami Yoshii
    Tatsuro Tamura
    Katsunobu Sakurai
    Naoshi Kubo
    Hiroaki Tanaka
    Shigeru Lee
    Kazuya Muguruma
    Masakazu Yashiro
    Masaichi Ohira
    BMC Surgery, 21
  • [45] Long-term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Compared to Open Esophagectomy
    Gottlieb-Vedi, Eivind
    Kauppila, Joonas H. H.
    Mattsson, Fredrik
    Lindblad, Mats
    Nilsson, Magnus
    Lagergren, Pernilla
    Rouvelas, Ioannis
    Lagergren, Jesper
    FINEGO Grp
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2022, 276 (06) : E744 - E748
  • [46] Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study
    Li, Zongjie
    Liu, Canhui
    Liu, Yuanguo
    Yao, Sheng
    Xu, Biao
    Dong, Guohua
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [47] Is minimally invasive esophagectomy effective for preventing anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Can Zhou
    Gang Ma
    Xiao Li
    Juan Li
    Yu Yan
    Peijun Liu
    Jianjun He
    Yu Ren
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 13
  • [48] Is minimally invasive esophagectomy effective for preventing anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhou, Can
    Ma, Gang
    Li, Xiao
    Li, Juan
    Yan, Yu
    Liu, Peijun
    He, Jianjun
    Ren, Yu
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 13
  • [49] Impact of pre-diabetes, well-controlled diabetes, and poorly controlled diabetes on anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a two-center retrospective cohort study of 1901 patients
    Hirano, Yuki
    Fujita, Takeo
    Konishi, Takaaki
    Takemura, Ryo
    Sato, Kazuma
    Kurita, Daisuke
    Ishiyama, Koshiro
    Fujiwara, Hisashi
    Oguma, Junya
    Itano, Osamu
    Daiko, Hiroyuki
    ESOPHAGUS, 2023, 20 (02) : 246 - 255
  • [50] Risk Reduction of Severe Anastomotic Leakage by Evaluation of Blood Perfusion Using Indocyanine Green After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Followed by Narrow Gastric Tube Reconstruction
    Kitadani, Junya
    Hayata, Keiji
    Goda, Taro
    Tominaga, Shinta
    Fukuda, Naoki
    Nakai, Tomoki
    Nagano, Shotaro
    Ojima, Toshiyasu
    Kawai, Manabu
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2024, 34 (06) : 619 - 624