Right gastroepiploic artery length determined anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a prospective cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Kun-Kun [1 ]
Wang, Ying-Jian [1 ]
Zhang, Tai-Ming [1 ]
Zhang, Liang [1 ]
Zhao, Shu-Lin [1 ]
Chen, Liang [1 ]
Bao, Tao [1 ]
Zhao, Xiao-Long [1 ]
Xie, Xian-Feng [1 ]
Guo, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Army Med Univ, Daping Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, Chongqing 400042, Peoples R China
关键词
anastomotic leakage; esophageal cancer; minimally invasive esophagectomy; right gastroepiploic artery; VASCULAR ANATOMY; GASTRIC TUBE; IVOR-LEWIS; STOMACH; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/JS9.0000000000001181
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:This prospective cohort study, conducted at a high-volume esophageal cancer center from July 2019 to July 2022, aimed to investigate the link between the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) length and anastomotic leakage (AL) rates following minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Real-world data on stomach blood supply in the Chinese population were examined.Materials and Methods:A total of 516 cases were enrolled, categorized into two groups based on the Youden index-determined optimal cut-off value for the relative length of RGEA (length of RGEA/length of gastric conduit, 64.69%) through ROC analysis: Group SR (short RGEA) and Group LR (long RGEA). The primary observation parameter was the relationship between AL incidence and the ratio of direct blood supply from RGEA. Secondary parameters included the mean length of the right gastroepiploic artery, greater curvature, and the connection type between right and left gastroepiploic vessels. Patient data were prospectively recorded in electronic case report forms.Results:The study revealed median lengths of 43.60 cm for greater curvature, 43.16 cm for the gastric conduit, and 26.75 cm for RGEA. AL, the most common postoperative complication, showed a significant difference between groups (16.88 vs. 8.84%, P=0.01). Multivariable binary logistic regression identified Group SR and LR (odds ratio: 2.651, 95% CI: 1.124-6.250, P=0.03) and Neoadjuvant therapy (odds ratio: 2.479, 95% CI: 1.374-4.473, P=0.00) as independent predictors of AL.Conclusions:The study emphasizes the crucial role of RGEA length in determining AL incidence in MIE for esophageal cancer. Preserving RGEA and fostering capillary arches between RGEA and LGEA are recommended strategies to mitigate AL risk.
引用
收藏
页码:2757 / 2764
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Alternate approaches for effective reduction in incidence of cervical anastomotic leakage after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective cohort study
    Lang, Baoping
    Zhang, Xiao
    Zhao, Song
    KUWAIT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 51 (01): : 44 - 50
  • [32] Intrathoracic versus Cervical ANastomosis after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: study protocol of the ICAN randomized controlled trial
    van Workum, Frans
    Bouwense, Stefan A. W.
    Luyer, Misha D. P.
    Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard A. P.
    van der Peet, Donald L.
    Daams, Freek
    Kouwenhoven, Ewout A.
    van Det, Marc J.
    van den Wildenberg, Frits J. H.
    Polat, Fatih
    Gisbertz, Suzanne S.
    Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge
    Heisterkamp, Joos
    Langenhoff, Barbara S.
    Martijnse, Ingrid S.
    Grutters, Janneke P.
    Klarenbeek, Bastiaan R.
    Rovers, Maroeska M.
    Rosman, Camiel
    TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [33] Impact of perioperative decreased serum albumin level on anastomotic leakage in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy
    Wang, Ying-Jian
    Xie, Xian-Feng
    He, Yi-Qiu
    Bao, Tao
    He, Xian-Dong
    Li, Kun-Kun
    Guo, Wei
    BMC CANCER, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [34] Recurrence and Survival After Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer A Post Hoc Analysis of the Ensure Study
    Henckens, Sofie P. G.
    Schuring, Nannet
    Elliott, Jessie A.
    Johar, Asif
    Markar, Sheraz R.
    Gantxegi, Amaia
    Lagergren, Pernilla
    Hanna, George B.
    Pera, Manuel
    Reynolds, John V.
    van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I.
    Gisbertz, Suzanne S.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2024, 280 (02) : 267 - 273
  • [35] Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with right aortic arch
    Linson, Jeremy
    Latzko, Michael
    Ahmed, Bestoun
    Awad, Ziad
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 8 (01) : E1 - E2
  • [36] Evaluation of the Associations between Gastric Tube Preparation Methods and the Incidence of Cervical Anastomotic Leakage after Esophagectomy for Thoracic Esophageal Cancer
    Miyawaki, Yutaka
    Sato, Hiroshi
    Fujiwara, Naoto
    Sugita, Hirofumi
    Sakuramoto, Shinichi
    Okamoto, Kojun
    Yamaguchi, Shigeki
    Koyama, Isamu
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 37 (02) : 154 - 162
  • [37] Impact of perioperative decreased serum albumin level on anastomotic leakage in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy
    Ying-Jian Wang
    Xian-Feng Xie
    Yi-Qiu He
    Tao Bao
    Xian-Dong He
    Kun-Kun Li
    Wei Guo
    BMC Cancer, 23
  • [38] Management and outcomes of anastomotic leakage after McKeown esophagectomy: A retrospective analysis of 749 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer
    Duan, Xiaofeng
    Bai, Weiwei
    Ma, Zhao
    Yue, Jie
    Shang, Xiaobin
    Jiang, Hongjing
    Yu, Zhentao
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2020, 34 : 304 - 309
  • [39] Prediction Model of Anastomotic Leakage Among Esophageal Cancer Patients After Receiving an Esophagectomy: Machine Learning Approach
    Zhao, Ziran
    Cheng, Xi
    Sun, Xiao
    Ma, Shanrui
    Feng, Hao
    Zhao, Liang
    JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2021, 9 (07)
  • [40] Air Bubble Sign: ANew Screening Method for Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
    Shoji, Yoshiaki
    Takeuchi, Hiroya
    Kitagawa, Yuko
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 : 713 - 714