Multicenter investigation of preoperative distinction between primary central nervous system lymphomas and glioblastomas through interpretable artificial intelligence models

被引:0
作者
Yang, Yun-Feng [1 ,2 ]
Shi, Yutong [6 ]
Zhao, Endong [4 ,5 ]
Zhang, Hao [3 ]
Yang, Yuan-Yuan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Shanghai Inst Tech Phys, Lab Med Imaging Informat, Shanghai 200083, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Lab Med Imaging Informat, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Intervent Radiol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[4] Dalian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiol, Dalian 116000, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[5] Dalian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Radiol, Dalian 116000, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[6] Dalian Univ, Affiliated Xinhua Hosp, Dept Neurol, Dalian, Liaoning, Peoples R China
关键词
Deep learning; Radiomics; Interpretable model; Primary central nervous system lymphoma; Glioblastoma; IMAGES; FUSION;
D O I
10.1007/s00234-024-03451-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveResearch into the effectiveness and applicability of deep learning, radiomics, and their integrated models based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for preoperative differentiation between Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) and Glioblastoma (GBM), along with an exploration of the interpretability of these models.Materials and methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on MRI images and clinical data from 261 patients across two medical centers. The data were split into a training set (n = 153, medical center 1) and an external test set (n = 108, medical center 2). Radiomic features were extracted using Pyradiomics to build the Radiomics Model. Deep learning networks, including the transformer-based MobileVIT Model and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) based ConvNeXt Model, were trained separately. By applying the "late fusion" theory, the radiomics model and deep learning model were fused to produce the optimal Max-Fusion Model. Additionally, Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Grad-CAM were employed for interpretability analysis.ResultsIn the external test set, the Radiomics Model achieved an Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.86, the MobileVIT Model had an AUC of 0.91, the ConvNeXt Model demonstrated an AUC of 0.89, and the Max-Fusion Model showed an AUC of 0.92. The Delong test revealed a significant difference in AUC between the Max-Fusion Model and the Radiomics Model (P = 0.02).ConclusionThe Max-Fusion Model, combining different models, presents superior performance in distinguishing PCNSL and GBM, highlighting the effectiveness of model fusion for enhanced decision-making in medical applications.Clinical Relevance StatementThe preoperative non-invasive differentiation between PCNSL and GBM assists clinicians in selecting appropriate treatment regimens and clinical management strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:1893 / 1906
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Multimodal fusion for multimedia analysis: a survey [J].
Atrey, Pradeep K. ;
Hossain, M. Anwar ;
El Saddik, Abdulmotaleb ;
Kankanhalli, Mohan S. .
MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS, 2010, 16 (06) :345-379
[2]  
Bakas S., 2018, Identifying the best machine learning algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, progression assessment, and overall survival prediction in the brats challenge, DOI 10.17863/CAM.38755
[3]   Data Descriptor: Advancing The Cancer Genome Atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features [J].
Bakas, Spyridon ;
Akbari, Hamed ;
Sotiras, Aristeidis ;
Bilello, Michel ;
Rozycki, Martin ;
Kirby, Justin S. ;
Freymann, John B. ;
Farahani, Keyvan ;
Davatzikos, Christos .
SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2017, 4
[4]   Radiomics-based differentiation between glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma: a comparison of diagnostic performance across different MRI sequences and machine learning techniques [J].
Bathla, Girish ;
Priya, Sarv ;
Liu, Yanan ;
Ward, Caitlin ;
Le, Nam H. ;
Soni, Neetu ;
Maheshwarappa, Ravishankar Pillenahalli ;
Monga, Varun ;
Zhang, Honghai ;
Sonka, Milan .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (11) :8703-8713
[5]   Increased relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) in brain lymphoma [J].
Dandois, V. ;
De Coene, B. ;
Laloux, R. ;
Godfraind, C. ;
Cosnard, G. .
JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2011, 38 (03) :191-193
[6]  
Dosovitskiy Alexey., 2021, PROC INT C LEARN REP, P2021
[7]   Differentiating glioblastoma from primary central nervous system lymphoma of atypical manifestation using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: A comparative study [J].
Feng, Aozi ;
Li, Li ;
Huang, Tao ;
Li, Shuna ;
He, Ningxia ;
Huang, Liying ;
Zeng, Mengnan ;
Lyu, Jun .
HELIYON, 2023, 9 (04)
[8]   Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data [J].
Gillies, Robert J. ;
Kinahan, Paul E. ;
Hricak, Hedvig .
RADIOLOGY, 2016, 278 (02) :563-577
[9]   Primary CNS Lymphoma [J].
Grommes, Christian ;
DeAngelis, Lisa M. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (21) :2410-+
[10]   Classifying primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma using deep learning and radiomics based machine learning approach-a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Guha, Amrita ;
Goda, Jayant S. ;
Dasgupta, Archya ;
Mahajan, Abhishek ;
Halder, Soutik ;
Gawde, Jeetendra ;
Talole, Sanjay .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12