Environmental sustainability of milk production: a comparative environmental impact analysis and sustainability evaluation

被引:4
|
作者
Singh, Alok Bihari [1 ]
Bhakar, Vikrant [2 ]
Gaurav, Gaurav [3 ]
Khandelwal, Chandni [4 ,5 ]
Sarkar, Prabir [2 ]
Singh, Harpreet [2 ]
Dangayach, Govind Sharan [1 ]
机构
[1] Malaviya Natl Inst Technol, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Ropar, Punjab, India
[3] Rao Birender Singh State Inst Engn & Technol, Zainabad, India
[4] Univ Engn & Management, Dept Management Studies, Jaipur, India
[5] Graphic Era, Dept Management Studies, Dehra Dun, India
来源
关键词
Life cycle assessment; milk production system; milk LCA; environmental sustainability; milk handling and processing; hotspot identification; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ECO-EFFICIENCY; INDIA; LCA;
D O I
10.3389/frsus.2024.1352572
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Context Assessing the sustainability of milk production in India (the largest milk producer country in the world) is essential to ensure that the dairy industry can meet the growing demands for dairy products while minimizing its negative impact on the environment, society, and the well-being of the people involved in the sector.Objective Current research is intended to compare the emissions associated with packed milk production in two contrasting states, Punjab (an Indian state with helpful agricultural resources and plenty of water) and Rajasthan (a state with a significant desert area) of India. The dairy industry has to undergo different production processes, including livestock, feed, farming, transportation, processing, packaging, and distribution. All of these production steps generate environmental impacts. This study aims to compare the environmental impacts of milk production in Punjab and Rajasthan by understanding the variation in the ecological effects due to the modifications adopted in dairy practices.Methods This study uses Umberto LCA+ with Ecoinvent v3.6 dataset as a Life cycle assessment (LCA) tool and data collected from milk producers and processing plants. The primary data was collected from farmers (milk producers) and dairy plants (processing plants), real-time observations, and inputs from the processing plant staff. The LCA analysis was performed, including parameters such as feed agriculture, milking, storage, transportation, processing, packaging, and distribution.Results and conclusion The analysis results indicate that milk production in Punjab is more environmentally efficient than in Rajasthan, and the feed required for cattle is a critical environmental impact-generating activity along with the selection of packaging material for processed milk.Significance The current article assesses the environmental implications of milk production. The study employs a comprehensive analysis to inform sustainable practices and reduce the ecological footprint of this crucial industry.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cleaner production and environmental sustainability: Analysis of the Serbian petrochemical plant
    Vukadinovic, Bojana
    Popovic, Ivanka
    Subotin, Aleksandar
    Kijevcanin, Mirjana
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2018, 40 (03) : 259 - 265
  • [32] Environmental Sustainability Analysis and Nutritional Strategies of Animal Production in China
    Tan, Bie
    Yin, Yulong
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ANIMAL BIOSCIENCES, VOL 5, 2017, 5 : 171 - 184
  • [33] Analysis of environmental sustainability of Cameroon tea production: an LCA study
    Tagne, Rufis Fregue Tiegam
    Ncube, Amos
    Atangana, Junie Albine Kenfack
    Tchuifon, Donald Raoul Tchuifon
    Ateba, Francois Rene
    Azambou, Ivane Christelle
    SUSTAINABLE FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 1 (01): : 116 - 125
  • [34] Environmental Sustainability Analysis of Charcoal Production in Mulanay, Quezon, Philippines
    Inzon, Maria Rowena Beatriz Q.
    Espaldon, Ma. Victoria O.
    Florece, Leonardo M.
    Rebancos, Carmelita M.
    Alcantara, Antonio J.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, : 93 - 100
  • [35] Environmental Sustainability Impact of Environmental Protection Regulations on the BRICS Countries
    Liu, Mingjun
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 2022
  • [36] Impact of mediterranean diet promotion on environmental sustainability: a longitudinal analysis
    Alvarez-Alvarez, L.
    Vitelli-Storelli, F.
    Rubin-Garcia, M.
    Garcia, S.
    Bouzas, C.
    Ruiz-Canela, M.
    Corella, D.
    Salas-Salvado, J.
    Fito, M.
    Martinez, J. A.
    Tojal-Sierra, L.
    Warnberg, J.
    Vioque, J.
    Romaguera, D.
    Lopez-Miranda, J.
    Estruch, R.
    Tinahones, F. J.
    Santos-Lozano, J. M.
    Serra-Majem, L.
    Bueno-Cavanillas, A.
    Garcia-Fernandez, C.
    Esteve-Luque, V.
    Delgado-Rodriguez, M.
    Torrego-Ellacuria, M.
    Vidal, J.
    Prieto, L.
    Daimiel, L.
    Casas, R.
    Arellano, A. Garcia
    Shyam, S.
    Gonzalez, J. I.
    Castaner, O.
    Garcia-Rios, A.
    Diaz, F. Ortiz
    Fernandez, A. C.
    Sanchez-Villegas, A.
    Morey, M.
    Cano-Ibanez, N.
    Sorto-Sanchez, C.
    Bernal-Lopez, M. R.
    Bes-Rastrollo, M.
    Nishi, S. K.
    Coltell, O.
    Zomeno, M. D.
    Pena-Orihuela, P. J.
    Aparicio, D., V
    Zulet, M. A.
    Vazquez, Z.
    Babio, N.
    Perez, K. A.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 230 : 12 - 20
  • [37] Biopolymers: a comprehensive review of sustainability, environmental impact, and lifecycle analysis
    Kogje, Mithilesh
    Satdive, Ajinkya
    Mestry, Siddhesh
    Mhaske, S. T.
    IRANIAN POLYMER JOURNAL, 2025,
  • [38] Production losses in Russian agriculture: Impact on food security and environmental sustainability
    Karlova, Natalia A.
    Payurova, Elena N.
    Galaktionova, Ekaterina A.
    VOPROSY EKONOMIKI, 2024, (11): : 76 - 89
  • [39] Impact of Covid-19 on environmental sustainability: A bibliometric analysis
    Ofori, Elvis Kwame
    Zhang, Jin
    Hayford, Isaac Sam
    Tergu, Clare Teroviel
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 31 (04) : 2176 - 2195
  • [40] Environmental Sustainability Disclosure vs. Environmental Sustainability Efficiency
    Suhail, M.
    Charumathi, B.
    DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION, 2024, : 489 - 506