Affordability and adherence gains for Medicare Part D low-income subsidy recipients when low-income subsidy benefits expanded in 2024

被引:0
|
作者
Stuart, Bruce C. [1 ]
Loh, F. Ellen [2 ]
Dougherty, Samantha [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Pharm, Dept Practice Sci & Hlth Outcomes Res, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Touro Univ, Touro Coll Pharm, Dept Social Behav & Adm Sci, New York, NY 10036 USA
[3] Pharmaceut Res & Manufacturers Amer, Dept Policy & Res, Washington, DC USA
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The lowest-income beneficiaries enrolled in the Medicare Part D prescription drug program receive "full subsidies" that waive the premium and deductible and impose minimal copayments. Those with slightly higher incomes and assets may be eligible for "partial subsidies." Prior to 2024, individuals receiving partial subsidies faced reduced Part D premiums and deductibles and paid 15% coinsurance. Under provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act, recipients of partial subsidies were upgraded to full subsidies beginning in 2024. The objective of this pilot study was to assess whether the new policy is likely to reduce cost-related nonadherence to prescribed medications- a common problem faced by older adults even among those receiving subsidies. OBJECTIVE: To compare cost-related nonadherence among partial- vs full-subsidy recipients with similar characteristics. METHODS: We used 2019 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data for the study. The Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey is uniquely suited for this work because it contains administrative data on low-income subsidy enrollment plus extensive survey-based information on financial resources necessary to establish program eligibility and rates of cost-related nonadherence. Explanatory variables included sociodemographic characteristics, economic resources, work status, and health variables. RESULTS: We found that the partial-subsidy group reported significantly more cost-related nonadherence (39% vs 22%; P =0.01) arising both from a lower propensity to fill some prescriptions (23% vs 12%; P = 0.03) and to more delays in filling others (29% vs 8%; P = 0.03). The differences were more pronounced for women and racial and ethnic minority groups in contrast to men and majority populations, respectively. Because the study samples were small, we could not conduct a detailed regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of cost-related nonadherence effects associated with partial-subsidy cost sharing suggests that the Inflation Reduction Act policy to expand low-income subsidies may boost medication adherence, most notably among women and racial and ethnic minority groups.
引用
收藏
页码:728 / 735
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Closing the affordability gap for drugs in low-income countries
    Steinbrook, Robert
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (20): : 1996 - 1999
  • [42] Supporting High-Value Part D Medicare Choices for Low-Income Beneficiaries
    Margolis, Karen L.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 173 (12) : 1107 - 1108
  • [43] Impact of Part D Low-income Subsidies on Medication Patterns for Medicare Beneficiaries With Diabetes
    Stuart, Bruce
    Yin, Xianghua
    Davidoff, Amy
    Simoni-Wastila, Linda
    Zuckerman, Ilene
    Shoemaker, J. Samantha
    Doshi, Jalpa
    MEDICAL CARE, 2012, 50 (11) : 913 - 919
  • [44] Policy Options To Expand Medicare's Low-Income Provisions To Improve Access And Affordability
    Schoen, Cathy
    Buttorff, Christine
    Andersen, Martin
    Davis, Karen
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2015, 34 (12) : 2086 - 2094
  • [45] Patterns of prescription drug expenditures and medication adherence among medicare part D beneficiaries with and without the low-income supplement
    Stella M Yala
    Obidiugwu Kenrik Duru
    Susan L Ettner
    Norman Turk
    Carol M Mangione
    Arleen F Brown
    BMC Health Services Research, 14
  • [46] Patterns of prescription drug expenditures and medication adherence among medicare part D beneficiaries with and without the low-income supplement
    Yala, Stella M.
    Duru, Obidiugwu Kenrik
    Ettner, Susan L.
    Turk, Norman
    Mangione, Carol M.
    Brown, Arleen F.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
  • [47] Benefits of antibiotics burden in low-income countries
    Abat, Cedric
    Gautret, Philippe
    Raoult, Didier
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (35) : EB109 - EB110
  • [48] MAXIMIZING LOW-INCOME HOUSING TAX BENEFITS
    GOOLSBY, WC
    WILLIAMS, GD
    REAL ESTATE REVIEW, 1990, 20 (01): : 78 - 83
  • [49] The Impact of Coverage Restrictions on Antipsychotic Utilization Among Low-Income Medicare Part D Enrollees
    Roberto, Pamela N.
    Brandt, Nicole
    Onukwugha, Eberechukwu
    Perfetto, Eleanor
    Powers, Christopher
    Stuart, Bruce
    ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 44 (06) : 943 - 954
  • [50] The Impact of Coverage Restrictions on Antipsychotic Utilization Among Low-Income Medicare Part D Enrollees
    Pamela N. Roberto
    Nicole Brandt
    Eberechukwu Onukwugha
    Eleanor Perfetto
    Christopher Powers
    Bruce Stuart
    Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 2017, 44 : 943 - 954