Affordability and adherence gains for Medicare Part D low-income subsidy recipients when low-income subsidy benefits expanded in 2024

被引:0
|
作者
Stuart, Bruce C. [1 ]
Loh, F. Ellen [2 ]
Dougherty, Samantha [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Pharm, Dept Practice Sci & Hlth Outcomes Res, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Touro Univ, Touro Coll Pharm, Dept Social Behav & Adm Sci, New York, NY 10036 USA
[3] Pharmaceut Res & Manufacturers Amer, Dept Policy & Res, Washington, DC USA
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The lowest-income beneficiaries enrolled in the Medicare Part D prescription drug program receive "full subsidies" that waive the premium and deductible and impose minimal copayments. Those with slightly higher incomes and assets may be eligible for "partial subsidies." Prior to 2024, individuals receiving partial subsidies faced reduced Part D premiums and deductibles and paid 15% coinsurance. Under provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act, recipients of partial subsidies were upgraded to full subsidies beginning in 2024. The objective of this pilot study was to assess whether the new policy is likely to reduce cost-related nonadherence to prescribed medications- a common problem faced by older adults even among those receiving subsidies. OBJECTIVE: To compare cost-related nonadherence among partial- vs full-subsidy recipients with similar characteristics. METHODS: We used 2019 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data for the study. The Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey is uniquely suited for this work because it contains administrative data on low-income subsidy enrollment plus extensive survey-based information on financial resources necessary to establish program eligibility and rates of cost-related nonadherence. Explanatory variables included sociodemographic characteristics, economic resources, work status, and health variables. RESULTS: We found that the partial-subsidy group reported significantly more cost-related nonadherence (39% vs 22%; P =0.01) arising both from a lower propensity to fill some prescriptions (23% vs 12%; P = 0.03) and to more delays in filling others (29% vs 8%; P = 0.03). The differences were more pronounced for women and racial and ethnic minority groups in contrast to men and majority populations, respectively. Because the study samples were small, we could not conduct a detailed regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of cost-related nonadherence effects associated with partial-subsidy cost sharing suggests that the Inflation Reduction Act policy to expand low-income subsidies may boost medication adherence, most notably among women and racial and ethnic minority groups.
引用
收藏
页码:728 / 735
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How Low-Income Subsidy Recipients Respond to Medicare Part D Cost Sharing
    Stuart, Bruce
    Hendrick, Franklin B.
    Xu, Jing
    Dougherty, J. Samantha
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 52 (03) : 1185 - 1206
  • [2] PLAN FORMULARY COVERAGE AND DRUG CONSUMPTION OF LOW-INCOME SUBSIDY RECIPIENTS IN MEDICARE PART D
    Zhou, B.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (03) : A261 - A261
  • [3] Addressing Annual Losses in Medicare Part D Low-Income Subsidy Program
    Roberts, Eric T.
    JAMA HEALTH FORUM, 2024, 5 (02):
  • [4] Eligibility and Take-up of the Medicare Part D Low-Income Subsidy
    Shoemaker, J. Samantha
    Davidoff, Amy J.
    Stuart, Bruce
    Zuckerman, Ilene H.
    Onukwugha, Eberechukwu
    Powers, Christopher
    INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING, 2012, 49 (03) : 214 - 230
  • [5] Medicare Part D low-income subsidy and disparities in breast cancer treatment
    Biggers, Alana
    Neuner, Joan
    Smith, Elizabeth
    Pezzin, Liliana
    Laud, Purushottam
    Charlson, John A.
    Smallwood, Alicia
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)
  • [6] THE MEDICARE PART D LOW-INCOME COST SUBSIDY (LICS) AND ADHERENCE TO MEDICATIONS FOR SECONDARY PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE
    Duru, O. Kenrik
    Edgington, Sarah
    Mangione, Carol
    Turk, Norman
    Tseng, Chi-hong
    Kimbro, Lindsay
    Ettner, Susan
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 : S324 - S324
  • [7] THE MEDICARE PART D LOW-INCOME SUBSIDY AND NONADHERENCE DUE TO COST: A RACIAL AND GENDER COMPARISON
    Bakk, L.
    Woodward, A. T.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2014, 54 : 18 - 18
  • [8] A Simple Change To The Medicare Part D Low-Income Subsidy Program Could Save $5 Billion
    Zhang, Yuting
    Zhou, Chao
    Baik, Seo Hyon
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2014, 33 (06) : 940 - 945
  • [9] HOW DO FORMULARY RESTRICTIONS AFFECT MEDICATION USE AND COSTS FOR LOW-INCOME SUBSIDY RECIPIENTS IN MEDICARE PART D PLANS?
    Shen, X.
    Stuart, B.
    Powers, C.
    Tom, S.
    Magder, L.
    Perfetto, E. M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (03) : A261 - A261
  • [10] Medicare part D and low-income Medicare beneficiaries
    Burns, B
    GENERATIONS-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING, 2005, 29 (01): : 91 - 93