Seismic Performance Assessment of Multitiered Steel Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames Designed to 2010 and 2022 AISC Seismic Provisions

被引:1
作者
Bani, Moad [1 ]
Imanpour, Ali [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Steel multitiered braced frames; Buckling-restrained braces; Seismic design; Nonlinear analysis; Metal and composite structures;
D O I
10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-13327
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper aims to evaluate the seismic response of multitiered buckling-restrained braced frames (MT-BRBFs), assess the design provisions specified by the 2022 AISC Seismic Provisions for multitiered BRBFs, and propose improvements to these provisions. A set of 17 frames is first selected by varying bracing configuration, frame height, number of tiers, and tier height ratio. The frames are then designed in accordance with the 2010 and 2022 AISC Seismic Provisions. A numerical parametric study is performed under scaled ground motion accelerations. The results of the parametric study show that when the frames are designed to the 2010 provisions, the frame inelastic deformation tends to concentrate in the tier(s) undergoing tensile yielding due to their lower postyield stiffness, compared to BRBs yielding in compression, which creates unequal story shear, contributed by braces, in adjacent tiers with BRBs in tension and compression and engages column flexure to compensate for unbalanced brace story shears between tiers. Columns experience yielding and even buckling in several cases due to combined flexural and axial load demands. MT-BRBFs designed to the 2022 AISC Seismic Provisions exhibit a more uniform deformation response between tiers and relatively lower flexural demands in their columns. However, these provisions may overestimate column in-plane flexural demands (on the order of 3), resulting in potentially uneconomical design solutions. On the basis of the numerical simulations, modifications are proposed to compression BRBs' adjusted strength to better estimate column in-plane flexure and tier deformation while achieving an economical column design. The proposed improvements are validated using dynamic analyses.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2022, Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, Standard Specification for Flow Table for use in Tests of Hidraulic Cement ASTM C230/C230M
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, SEISM PROV STRUCT ST
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2016, Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2019, Standard specification for steel, sheet, carbon, structural, and high-strength, low-alloy, hot-rolled and cold-rolled
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2009, FEMA P695
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2018, SEISMIC DESIGN MANUA
  • [9] ASCE, 2022, MINIMUM DESIGN LOADS
  • [10] ASCE/SEI, 2010, 710 ASCESEI