Scotopic and Photopic Conventional Visual Acuity and Hyperacuity - Binocular Summation

Purpose:The purpose of this study was to determine and compare binocularsummation (BiS) of conventional visual acuity (cVA) versus hyperacuity (hVA) forphotopic and scotopic luminance conditions as a potential biomarker to assess theoutcome of interventions on binocular function. Methods: Sixteen young adults (age range [years] = 21-31; 8 women; cVA logMAR < 0.0) participated in this study. The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test (FrACT) was used for VA testing and retested on another day. Both cVA and hVA were determined for dark grey optotypes on light grey background. Participants underwent 40 minutes of dark adaptation prior to scotopic VA testing. Binocular and monocular VA testing was performed. The eye with better VA over the 2 days of testing was selected, the BiS was quantified (binocular VA - better monocular VA) and repeated measures ANOVAs were performed. Results: Binocular VA exceeded monocular VA for all luminance conditions, VA-types, and sessions. We report BiS estimates for photopic and scotopic cVA and hVA, (logMAR BiS +/- SEM [decimal BiS]): photopic = -0.01 +/- 0.01 [1.03] and -0.06 +/- 0.03 [1.15]; and scotopic = -0.05 +/- 0.01 [1.12] and -0.11 +/- 0.04 [1.28], respectively). Improvement for binocular vision estimates ranged from 0.01 to 0.11 logMAR. A repeated-measures ANOVA (RM ANOVA) did not reveal significant effects of LUMINANCE or VA TYPE on BiS, albeit a trend for strongest BiS for scotopic hVA (15% vs. 28%, photopic versus scotopic, respectively) and weakest for photopic cVA (3% vs. 12%, photopic versus scotopic conditions, respectively). Conclusions: Our results indicate that BiS of VA is relevant to scotopic and photopic hVA and cVA. It appears therefore a plausible candidate biomarker to assess the outcome of retinal therapies restoring rod or cone function on binocular vision.