ONLINE STUDENT ENGAGEMENT IN THE TURKISH CONTEXT: A PRISMA-BASED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

被引:0
作者
Atun, Handan [1 ]
Cinar, Dincer [2 ]
Sengun Oztas, Elif [3 ]
Gulbahar, Yasemin [4 ]
Laws, Sa'ad [5 ]
Weber, Alan S. [6 ]
Bianchi, Robert [7 ]
Kittaneh, Khawla [7 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Distance Educ Res & Applicat Ctr, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Minist Natl Educ, Sakarya, Turkiye
[3] Ankara Ufuk Univ, Dept Comp Technol, Ankara, Turkiye
[4] Columbia Univ, Teachers Coll, New York, NY USA
[5] Weill Cornell Med, Hlth Sci Lib, Doha, Qatar
[6] Weill Cornell Med, Doha, Qatar
[7] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Liberal Arts & Sci, Doha, Qatar
来源
TURKISH ONLINE JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION | 2024年 / 25卷 / 03期
关键词
Online engagement; engagement; distance education; e; -learning; systematic review; EDUCATION; SCHOOL; INSTRUMENT; MOTIVATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The ability to interact or engage with the instructor, other students, and the content i.e., to experience online student engagement, is one main difference between traditional and digital media employed in teaching and learning processes. As literature on this topic in the Turkish context has proliferated, to date, virtually no systematic reviews of this research have been carried out in order to identify potential gaps in the literature. To address this issue, this study investigated previously conducted research in chronological order on student engagement at the post-secondary level in the Turkish context using a PRISMA-based systematic review screening process. The results show that online engagement research and practices have clearly increased and diversified over time. Specifically, online engagement research in the Turkish context has tended to focus on computer science students studying in online-only, LMS-supported environments where their behavioral engagement has been investigated quantitatively. Considering these findings, this systematic review suggests that future studies in the Turkish context should examine other fields besides computer science education, focus more on collaborative tools and the social dimension of engagement, use more qualitative methods, and investigate blended environments as well as online-only.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 125
页数:27
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [51] Motivation and Engagement Across the Academic Life Span A Developmental Construct Validity Study of Elementary School, High School, and University/College Students
    Martin, Andrew J.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2009, 69 (05) : 794 - 824
  • [52] Engagement Matters: Student Perceptions on the Importance of Engagement Strategies in the Online Learning Environment
    Martin, Florence
    Bolliger, Doris U.
    [J]. ONLINE LEARNING, 2018, 22 (01): : 205 - 222
  • [53] Fostering student engagement through a real-world, collaborative project across disciplines and institutions
    Mebert, Laura
    Barnes, Roy
    Dalley, Jacqueline
    Gawarecki, Leszek
    Ghazi-Nezami, Farnaz
    Shafer, Gregory
    Slater, Jill
    Yezbick, Erin
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION PEDAGOGIES, 2020, 5 (01): : 30 - 51
  • [54] Using Reading Times and Eye-Movements to Measure Cognitive Engagement
    Miller, Brian W.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2015, 50 (01) : 31 - 42
  • [55] Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
    Moher, David
    Shamseer, Larissa
    Clarke, Mike
    Ghersi, Davina
    Liberati, Alessandro
    Petticrew, Mark
    Shekelle, Paul
    Stewart, Lesley A.
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE NUTRICION HUMANA Y DIETETICA, 2016, 20 (02): : 148 - 160
  • [56] Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
    Moher, David
    Liberati, Alessandro
    Tetzlaff, Jennifer
    Altman, Douglas G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 62 (10) : 1006 - 1012
  • [57] Nguyen T., 2015, Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, V11
  • [58] Validation of an observation instrument for measuring student engagement in health professions settings
    O'Malley, KJ
    Moran, BJ
    Haidet, P
    Seidel, CL
    Schneider, V
    Morgan, RO
    Kelly, PA
    Richards, B
    [J]. EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2003, 26 (01) : 86 - 103
  • [59] Page MJ, 2021, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V372, DOI [10.1136/bmj.n71, 10.1136/bmj.n160, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906]
  • [60] Piburn M., 2000, Reformed teaching observation protocol (RTOP)