Revision of metal-on-metal hip replacements with dual-mobility bearings and acetabular component retention

被引:1
作者
Fishley, W. [1 ,2 ]
Nandra, R. [1 ,3 ]
Carluke, I. [1 ,2 ]
Partington, P. F. [1 ,2 ]
Reed, M. R. [1 ,2 ]
Kramer, D. J. [1 ,2 ]
Wilson, M. J. [1 ,3 ]
Hubble, M. J. W. [1 ,3 ]
Howell, J. R. [1 ,3 ]
Whitehouse, S. L. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Petheram, T. G. [1 ,2 ]
Kassam, A. -A M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Devon Univ Healthcare NHS Fdn Trust, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaed Ctr, Hip Unit, Exeter, Devon, England
[2] Northumbria Healthcare NHS Fdn Trust, Wansbeck Hosp, Northumbria Revis Arthroplasty Grp, Ashington, England
[3] Royal Devon Univ Healthcare NHS Fdn Trust, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaed Ctr, Exeter Hip Unit, Exeter Hip Grp, Exeter, England
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Australia
来源
BONE & JOINT OPEN | 2024年 / 5卷 / 06期
关键词
NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY; ARTHROPLASTY; DEBRIS;
D O I
10.1302/2633-1462.56.BJO-2023-0165.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims In metal -on -metal (MoM) hip arthroplasties and resurfacings, mechanically induced corrosion can lead to elevated serum metal ions, a local inflammatory response, and formation of pseudotumours, ultimately requiring revision. The size and diametral clearance of anatomical (ADM) and modular (MDM) dual -mobility polyethylene bearings match those of Birmingham hip MoM components. If the acetabular component is satisfactorily positioned, well integrated into the bone, and has no surface damage, this presents the opportunity for revision with exchange of the metal head for ADM/MDM polyethylene bearings without removal of the acetabular component. Methods Between 2012 and 2020, across two centres, 94 patients underwent revision of Birmingham MoM hip arthroplasties or resurfacings. Mean age was 65.5 years (33 to 87). In 53 patients (56.4%), the acetabular component was retained and dual -mobility bearings were used (DM); in 41 (43.6%) the acetabulum was revised (AR). Patients underwent follow-up of minimum two -years (mean 4.6 (2.1 to 8.5) years). Results In the DM group, two (3.8%) patients underwent further surgery: one (1.9%) for dislocation and one (1.9%) for infection. In the AR group, four (9.8%) underwent further procedures: two (4.9%) for loosening of the acetabular component and two (4.9%) following dislocations. There were no other dislocations in either group. In the DM group, operating time (68.4 vs 101.5 mins, p < 0.001), postoperative drop in haemoglobin (16.6 vs 27.8 g/L, p < 0.001), and length of stay (1.8 vs 2.4 days, p < 0.001) were significantly lower. There was a significant reduction in serum metal ions postoperatively in both groups (p < 0.001), although there was no difference between groups for this reduction (p = 0.674 (cobalt); p = 0.186 (chromium)). Conclusion In selected patients with Birmingham MoM hips, where the acetabular component is well -fixed and in a satisfactory position with no surface damage, the metal head can be exchanged for polyethylene ADM/MDM bearings with retention of the acetabular prosthesis. This presents significant benefits, with a shorter procedure and a lower risk of complications.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 523
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adverse effects after metal-on-metal bearings in total hip arthroplasty
    Friesenbichler, J.
    Maurer-Ertl, W.
    Pirker-Fruehauf, U.
    Wolf, M.
    Leithner, A.
    Weger, C.
    Pechmann, M.
    Sadoghi, P.
    MINERVA ORTOPEDICA E TRAUMATOLOGICA, 2012, 63 (05) : 379 - 385
  • [32] Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision
    Matharu, Gulraj S.
    Pandit, Hemant G.
    Murray, David W.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 475 (02) : 304 - 314
  • [33] Wear of metal-on-metal hip bearings: metallurgical considerations after hip simulator studies
    Affatato, Saverio
    Traina, Francesco
    Ruggeri, Oddone
    Toni, Aldo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2011, 34 (12) : 1155 - 1164
  • [34] The Outcome of Revision Surgery for Failed Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Borton, Zakk M.
    Mumith, Aadil S.
    Nicholls, Alex J.
    Pearce, Andrea R.
    Briant-Evans, Toby W.
    Griffiths, Jamie T.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (08) : 1749 - 1754
  • [35] Effect of head size on wear properties of metal-on-metal bearings of hip prostheses, and comparison with wear properties of metal-on-polyethylene bearings using hip simulator
    Okazaki, Yoshimitsu
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2014, 31 : 152 - 163
  • [36] Dual-mobility implants prevent hip dislocation following hip revision in obese patients
    Hernigou, Philippe
    Auregan, Jean Charles
    Potage, Damien
    Roubineau, Francois
    Lachaniette, Charles Henri Flouzat
    Dubory, Arnaud
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2017, 41 (03) : 469 - 473
  • [37] The Utility of Metal Ion Trends in Predicting Revision in Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Carlson, Bayard C.
    Bryan, Andrew J.
    Carrillo-Villamizar, Nazly T.
    Sierra, Rafael J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (09) : S214 - S219
  • [38] MRI of Aseptic Lymphocytic Vasculitis-Associated Lesions in Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements
    Yanny, Sarah
    Cahir, John G.
    Barker, Timothy
    Wimhurst, James
    Nolan, John F.
    Goodwin, Richard W.
    Marshall, Tom
    Toms, Andoni P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (06) : 1394 - 1402
  • [39] Revision of Failed Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty: Midterm Outcomes of 203 Consecutive Cases
    Crawford, David A.
    Adams, Joanne B.
    Morris, Michael J.
    Berend, Keith R.
    Lombardi, Adolph V., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (08) : 1755 - 1760
  • [40] A simulator study of adverse wear with metal and cement debris contamination in metal-on-metal hip bearings
    Halim, T.
    Clarke, I. C.
    Burgett-Moreno, M. D.
    Donaldson, T. K.
    Savisaar, C.
    Bowsher, J. G.
    BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2015, 4 (03): : 29 - 37