Revision of metal-on-metal hip replacements with dual-mobility bearings and acetabular component retention

被引:1
作者
Fishley, W. [1 ,2 ]
Nandra, R. [1 ,3 ]
Carluke, I. [1 ,2 ]
Partington, P. F. [1 ,2 ]
Reed, M. R. [1 ,2 ]
Kramer, D. J. [1 ,2 ]
Wilson, M. J. [1 ,3 ]
Hubble, M. J. W. [1 ,3 ]
Howell, J. R. [1 ,3 ]
Whitehouse, S. L. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Petheram, T. G. [1 ,2 ]
Kassam, A. -A M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Devon Univ Healthcare NHS Fdn Trust, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaed Ctr, Hip Unit, Exeter, Devon, England
[2] Northumbria Healthcare NHS Fdn Trust, Wansbeck Hosp, Northumbria Revis Arthroplasty Grp, Ashington, England
[3] Royal Devon Univ Healthcare NHS Fdn Trust, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaed Ctr, Exeter Hip Unit, Exeter Hip Grp, Exeter, England
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Australia
来源
BONE & JOINT OPEN | 2024年 / 5卷 / 06期
关键词
NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY; ARTHROPLASTY; DEBRIS;
D O I
10.1302/2633-1462.56.BJO-2023-0165.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims In metal -on -metal (MoM) hip arthroplasties and resurfacings, mechanically induced corrosion can lead to elevated serum metal ions, a local inflammatory response, and formation of pseudotumours, ultimately requiring revision. The size and diametral clearance of anatomical (ADM) and modular (MDM) dual -mobility polyethylene bearings match those of Birmingham hip MoM components. If the acetabular component is satisfactorily positioned, well integrated into the bone, and has no surface damage, this presents the opportunity for revision with exchange of the metal head for ADM/MDM polyethylene bearings without removal of the acetabular component. Methods Between 2012 and 2020, across two centres, 94 patients underwent revision of Birmingham MoM hip arthroplasties or resurfacings. Mean age was 65.5 years (33 to 87). In 53 patients (56.4%), the acetabular component was retained and dual -mobility bearings were used (DM); in 41 (43.6%) the acetabulum was revised (AR). Patients underwent follow-up of minimum two -years (mean 4.6 (2.1 to 8.5) years). Results In the DM group, two (3.8%) patients underwent further surgery: one (1.9%) for dislocation and one (1.9%) for infection. In the AR group, four (9.8%) underwent further procedures: two (4.9%) for loosening of the acetabular component and two (4.9%) following dislocations. There were no other dislocations in either group. In the DM group, operating time (68.4 vs 101.5 mins, p < 0.001), postoperative drop in haemoglobin (16.6 vs 27.8 g/L, p < 0.001), and length of stay (1.8 vs 2.4 days, p < 0.001) were significantly lower. There was a significant reduction in serum metal ions postoperatively in both groups (p < 0.001), although there was no difference between groups for this reduction (p = 0.674 (cobalt); p = 0.186 (chromium)). Conclusion In selected patients with Birmingham MoM hips, where the acetabular component is well -fixed and in a satisfactory position with no surface damage, the metal head can be exchanged for polyethylene ADM/MDM bearings with retention of the acetabular prosthesis. This presents significant benefits, with a shorter procedure and a lower risk of complications.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 523
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Total hip replacements with metal-on-metal bearings
    Milosev, Ingrid
    Kovac, Simon
    Topolovec, Matevz
    Pisot, Venceslav
    Trebse, Rihard
    ZDRAVNISKI VESTNIK-SLOVENIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 78 : 34 - 40
  • [2] Salvage of Monoblock Metal-on-Metal Acetabular Components Using a Dual-Mobility Bearing
    Plummer, Darren R.
    Botero, Herman G.
    Berend, Keith R.
    Pritchett, James W.
    Lombardi, Adolph V.
    Della Valle, Craig J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (04) : 846 - 849
  • [3] Dual-mobility bearings in complex revision hip arthroplasty
    Wakeling, Christopher P.
    Sandiford, Nemandra A.
    Ghani, Rafia
    Bridle, Simon J.
    Mitchell, Philip A.
    Hutt, Jonathan R. B.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 32 (04) : 460 - 465
  • [4] Outcomes of Dual Mobility Bearings in Revision Total Hip Replacements
    White, Christopher
    Abdalla, Waleed
    Awasthi, Prashant
    Iranpour, Farhad
    Subramanian, Padmanabhan
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [5] Is there a rationale to use a dual mobility poly insert for failed Birmingham metal-on-metal hip replacements? A retrieval analysis
    Renner, Lisa
    Faschingbauer, Martin
    Boettner, Friedrich
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2015, 135 (08) : 1177 - 1181
  • [6] CoCrMo metal-on-metal hip replacements
    Liao, Yifeng
    Hoffman, Emily
    Wimmer, Markus
    Fischer, Alfons
    Jacobs, Joshua
    Marks, Laurence
    PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 15 (03) : 746 - 756
  • [7] Dual Mobility for Monoblock Metal-on-Metal Revision-Is It Safe?
    Colacchio, Nicholas D.
    Wooten, Clint J.
    Martin, John R.
    Masonis, John L.
    Fehring, Thomas K.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (02) : 508 - 512
  • [8] Corrosion on the Acetabular Liner Taper from Retrieved Modular Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Replacements
    Gascoyne, Trevor C.
    Dyrkacz, Richard M.
    Turgeon, Thomas R.
    Burnell, Colin D.
    Wyss, Urs P.
    Brandt, Jan-M.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (10) : 2049 - 2052
  • [9] Revision of metal-on-metal hip replacements and resurfacings for adverse reaction to metal debris: a systematic review of outcomes
    Matharu, Gulraj S.
    Pynsent, Paul B.
    Dunlop, David J.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 24 (04) : 311 - 320
  • [10] Graphitic Tribological Layers in Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements
    Liao, Y.
    Pourzal, R.
    Wimmer, M. A.
    Jacobs, J. J.
    Fischer, A.
    Marks, L. D.
    SCIENCE, 2011, 334 (6063) : 1687 - 1690