'ARE WE DOING IT RIGHT? EXPLORING HOW TO CONDUCT ETHICAL DESIGN RESEARCH AND PRACTICE WHEN WORKING WITH VULNERABLE PARTICIPANTS'

被引:0
作者
Kiernan, Louise [1 ]
McMahon, Muireann [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Limerick, Sch Design, Limerick, Ireland
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND PRODUCT DESIGN EDUCATION, E&PDE 2023 | 2023年 / 123卷
关键词
Design research; ethics; product design; design education; HEALTH;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
As designing with vulnerable users becomes more prevalent, we need to establish guidelines to ensure ethical practices to protect both participant and researcher. Current research would advocate that design research should be conducted with end user groups to ensure that solutions developed meet the needs and expectations of those most impacted by the issues. This approach, however, may not always be ethical or appropriate in design projects at undergraduate (UG) level. Along with many of the standard ethical considerations when conducting research with vulnerable groups there are additional considerations when developing design solutions. Many design projects never reach fruition or may take years to develop a functional design requiring participant involvement over the course of the project. Student projects are not always focused on the implementation of final designs. This paper explores several case studies of UG product design projects where vulnerable participants have been involved at various stages and to varying degrees. Case study analyses follow a description of these projects. The discussion unpacks key questions such as: when is it appropriate to involve participants? What are the most useful methods to work with participants? When are alternative methods of research and testing sufficient? How can expectations be managed? And what is the payback for people to participate? The paper concludes by proposing a guide for how and when to involve users as participants in the UG design process.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 24
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   The concept of ′vulnerability′ in research ethics: an in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines [J].
Bracken-Roche, Dearbhail ;
Bell, Emily ;
Macdonald, Mary Ellen ;
Racine, Eric .
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2017, 15
[2]  
Carroll P., 2021, HRB Open Research, V4
[3]  
Cash P., 2021, Design Studies, P78
[4]   Reported Benefits of Participation in a Research Study [J].
Castillo, Anabella G. ;
Jandorf, Lina ;
Thelemaque, Linda D. ;
King, Sheba ;
Duhamel, Katherine .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2012, 37 (01) :59-64
[5]   Ethical Challenges for Student Design Projects in Health Care Settings in New Zealand [J].
Godbold, Rosemary ;
Lees, Amanda ;
Reay, Stephen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ART & DESIGN EDUCATION, 2019, 38 (01) :182-192
[6]  
HSE, 2022, National Policy for Consent in Health and Social Care Research.
[7]   Bringing New Voices to Design of Exercise Technology: participatory design with vulnerable young adults [J].
Kanstrup, Anne Marie ;
Bertelsen, Pernille .
PARTICIPATORY DESIGN IN AN ERA OF PARTICIPATION (PDC 2016), VOL 1, 2016, :121-130
[8]  
Mulvale G., 2019, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, V2019, P18
[9]  
Neuman W.L., 2007, Basics of Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches, V2nd
[10]   Conducting Accessible Research: Including People With Disabilities in Public Health, Epidemiological, and Outcomes Studies [J].
Rios, Dianne ;
Magasi, Susan ;
Novak, Catherine ;
Harniss, Mark .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 106 (12) :2137-2144