The US and EU Response to Tunisia's Democratic Backsliding: Promoting Democracy or Protecting Interests?

被引:1
作者
do Ceu Pinto Arena, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minho, Braga, Portugal
关键词
democratic backsliding; Tunisia; US; EU; migration; security; NORMATIVE POWER EUROPE;
D O I
10.1080/03932729.2024.2357172
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
The European Union (EU) and the United States (US) have not responded with sufficient urgency to the democratic backsliding in Tunisia as a result of President Ka & iuml;s Sa & iuml;ed's reforms since July 2021. Promoting democracy and good governance abroad, once a cornerstone of the liberal order championed by both the US and the EU, appears to have diminished as a priority. The US's and EU's emphasis on security interests in their foreign policy has significantly hindered efforts to promote democratisation. The perceived crisis surrounding terrorism and migration has influenced the US's and EU's approach, potentially neglecting the importance of human rights and democratic principles in the process. This underscores the tension between addressing immediate security challenges and upholding broader democratic values, and calls for a broader reflection on the balance between security and democracy in shaping foreign policy responses to complex challenges, such as terrorism and migration.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 178
页数:21
相关论文
共 119 条
[1]  
AFP, 2023, ANEWS 0520
[2]  
AFP (Agence France-Presse), 2023, ZAWAY 0328
[3]  
Agenzia Nova, 2023, TUNISIA EU COMMISSIO
[4]  
Alessandri Emiliano, 2015, 1 EUSPRING
[5]  
Amara Tarek, 2023, REUTERS 0217
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2023, AGENZIA NOVA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Belarus: Declaration by the high representative on behalf of the European Union on the presidential elections, Press release
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2024, FRANCE 24 0129
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Memorandum of Understanding on a Strategic Partnership on Sustainable Raw Materials Value Chains between the EU and Argentina
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2008, European Foreign Affairs Review