Techno-economic assessment of bioleaching for metallurgical by-products

被引:9
作者
Kara, Ipek Tezyapar [1 ]
Wagland, Stuart T. [1 ]
Coulon, Frederic [1 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Sch Water Energy & Environm, Cranfield MK43 0AL, England
关键词
Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans; Biohydrometallurgy; Secondary resources; Techno-economic assessment; Economic feasibility; RARE-EARTH-ELEMENTS; RECOVERY; WPCBS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120904
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study focused on the economic feasibility of two potential industrial-scale bioleaching technologies for metal recovery from specific metallurgical by-products, mainly basic oxygen steelmaking dust (BOS-D) and goethite. The investigation compared two bioleaching scaling technology configurations, including an aerated bioreactor and an aerated and stirred bioreactor across different scenarios. Results indicated that bioleaching using Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans proved financially viable for copper extraction from goethite, particularly when 5% and 10% pulp densities were used in the aerated bioreactor, and when 10% pulp density was used in the aerated and stirred bioreactor. Notably, a net present value (NPV) of $1,275,499k and an internal rate of return (IRR) of 65% for Cu recovery from goethite were achieved over 20-years after project started using the aerated and stirred bioreactor plant with a capital expenditure (CAPEX) of $119,816,550 and an operational expenditure (OPEX) of $5,896,580/year. It is expected that plant will start to make profit after one year of operation. Aerated and stirred bioreactor plant appeared more reliable alternative compared to the aerated bioreactor plant as the plant consists of 12 reactors which can allow better management and operation in small volume with multiple reactors. Despite the limitations, this techno-economic assessment emphasized the significance of selective metal recovery and plant design, and underscored the major expenses associated with the process.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Recent sustainable trends for e-waste bioleaching [J].
Al Sultan, Mohammed Sami ;
Benli, Birgul .
PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROBLEMS OF MINERAL PROCESSING, 2023, 59 (05)
[2]  
alansfactoryoutlet, 2021, Alan's Factory Outlet
[3]   Sustainable bioleaching of lithium-ion batteries for critical materials recovery [J].
Alipanah, Majid ;
Reed, David ;
Thompson, Vicki ;
Fujita, Yoshiko ;
Jin, Hongyue .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 382
[4]   Bioleaching: urban mining option to curb the menace of E-waste challenge [J].
Arya, Shashi ;
Kumar, Sunil .
BIOENGINEERED, 2020, 11 (01) :640-660
[5]   Bioleaching of spent refinery catalysts: A review [J].
Asghari, I. ;
Mousavi, S. M. ;
Amiri, F. ;
Tavassoli, S. .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 2013, 19 (04) :1069-1081
[6]   Selection of a CO2 capture technology for the cement industry: An integrated TEA and LCA methodological framework [J].
Bacatelo, M. ;
Capucha, F. ;
Ferrao, P. ;
Margarido, F. .
JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION, 2023, 68
[7]  
Becker Leon, 2018, About us
[8]   Hydrometallurgical Processes for the Recovery of Metals from Steel Industry By-Products: A Critical Review [J].
Binnemans, Koen ;
Jones, Peter Tom ;
Manjon Fernandez, Alvaro ;
Masaguer Torres, Victoria .
JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE METALLURGY, 2020, 6 (04) :505-540
[9]   Column bioleaching copper and its kinetics of waste printed circuit boards (WPCBs) by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans [J].
Chen, Shu ;
Yang, Yuankun ;
Liu, Congqiang ;
Dong, Faqin ;
Liu, Bijun .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2015, 141 :162-168
[10]  
compoundchem, 2019, Compound Interest