For whom the bell of proportionality tolls: Three proposals for strengthening proportionality compliance

被引:0
作者
Jang, Won [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
proportionality; proportionality assessments; dual-use items; rapid multidisciplinary assessment teams; archives for proportionality assessments; HUMANITARIAN LAW;
D O I
10.1017/S181638312100062X
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The State-centric bias in proportionality in international humanitarian law, where non-State armed groups (NSAGs) are expected to adhere to the same rigour of proportionality as States, regardless of how unrealistic that expectation is, has not often been considered in ideas to improve compliance with proportionality. This article puts forth three proposals - a Comprehensive Proportionality Assessment Framework, capacity-building for military actors, and rapid multidisciplinary assessment teams - that aim to reduce State-centric bias and strengthen proportionality compliance not just for States but for all parties to conflict, including NSAGs.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 657
页数:29
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Bellal A., 2016, HUMANITARIAN ENGAGEM
  • [2] Bellal A, 2018, YEARB INT HUMANIT L, V19, P37, DOI 10.1007/978-94-6265-213-2_2
  • [3] BROWN BL, 1976, CORNELL INT LAW J, V10, P134
  • [4] Proportionality in Armed Conflicts: A Principle in Need of Clarification?
    Clarke, Ben
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LEGAL STUDIES, 2012, 3 (01) : 73 - 123
  • [5] Dill Janina, 2010, APPL PRINCIPLE PROPO, P4
  • [6] Geneva Call, 2020, GARANCE SERIES, V3
  • [7] Geneva Call, 2020, GARANCE TALKS ARMED
  • [8] Geneva Water Hub, 2019, GEN LIST PRINC PROT, P28
  • [9] Gillard Emanuela-Chiara, 2018, PROPORTIONALITY COND, P47
  • [10] Gisel Laurent, 2016, INT EXP M PRINC PROP, P48