Consumers' online brand-related misinformation engagement: a weapons of influence perspective

被引:0
作者
Hollebeek, Linda D. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Parts, Oliver [3 ]
Urbonavicius, Sigitas [2 ]
Riisalu, Rein [3 ]
Adomaviciute-Sakalauske, Karina [2 ]
Jansson, Johan [4 ]
机构
[1] Sunway Univ, Teng Yew Huat Endowed Chair Mkt, Sunway Business Sch, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
[2] Vilnius Univ, Dept Mkt, Vilnius, Lithuania
[3] Tallinn Univ Technol, Dept Business Adm, Tallinn, Estonia
[4] Umea Univ, Dept Business Adm, Umea, Sweden
[5] Lund Univ, Dept Business Adm, Lund, Sweden
[6] Univ Johannesburg, Dept Mkt Management, Johannesburg, South Africa
关键词
Misinformation; consumer engagement; brands; Cialdini's weapons of influence; marketing strategy; SOCIAL PROOF; CONTINUED INFLUENCE; INFORMATION; MODEL; SCALE;
D O I
10.1080/0965254X.2024.2380657
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
While misinformation has been around for centuries, the effects of online brand-related misinformation on consumers' engagement remain tenuous. Addressing this gap, we develop the concept of online brand-related misinformation engagement, a consumer's (e.g. cognitive/emotional) resource investment in their interactions with misinformation about brands. Recognizing the persuasive nature of misinformation, we draw on Cialdini's Weapons of Persuasive Influence to develop a typology comprising three positively valenced online brand-related misinformation engagement sub-types (i.e. reciprocal, social proof-, and consistency-based misinformation engagement), and three negatively valenced online brand-related misinformation engagement sub-types (i.e. repudiating, thwarting, and oppositional misinformation engagement). We then develop a Weapons of Influence-informed model that outlines the effect of online brand-related misinformation authority and scarcity on consumers' brand-related misinformation evaluation (liking), and its subsequent effect on their positive or negative online brand-related misinformation engagement, respectively. While consumers' positive online brand-related misinformation engagement is predicted to yield online misinformation continuation or -intensification, its negative counterpart will generate online misinformation adjustment or -correction.
引用
收藏
页码:1415 / 1434
页数:20
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [1] Harnessing the Influence of Social Proof in Online Shopping: The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth on Sales of Digital Microproducts
    Amblee, Naveen
    Bui, Tung
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, 2011, 16 (02) : 91 - 113
  • [2] Would you notice if fake news changed your behavior? An experiment on the unconscious effects of disinformation
    Bastick, Zach
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2021, 116
  • [3] Berton P, 2018, ROUTL CONTEMP JPN SE, V75, P1, DOI [10.4324/9781315229010, 10.1177/0276146718755869]
  • [4] Blau P., 1964, EXCHANGE POWER SOC
  • [5] Engagement valence duality and spillover effects in online brand communities
    Bowden, Jana Lay-Hwa
    Conduit, Jodie
    Hollebeek, Linda D.
    Luoma-aho, Vilma
    Solem, Birgit Apenes
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SERVICE THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2017, 27 (04) : 877 - 897
  • [7] Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis
    Brodie, Roderick J.
    Ilic, Ana
    Juric, Biljana
    Hollebeek, Linda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2013, 66 (01) : 105 - 114
  • [8] Customer Engagement: Conceptual Domain, Fundamental Propositions, and Implications for Research
    Brodie, Roderick J.
    Hollebeek, Linda D.
    Juric, Biljana
    Ilic, Ana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SERVICE RESEARCH, 2011, 14 (03) : 252 - 271
  • [9] Consumer Misinformation and the Brand Premium: A Private Label Blind Taste Test
    Bronnenberg, Bart J.
    Dube, Jean-Pierre
    Sanders, Robert E.
    [J]. MARKETING SCIENCE, 2020, 39 (02) : 382 - 406
  • [10] Machine learning techniques and older adults processing of online information and misinformation: A covid 19 study
    Choudrie, Jyoti
    Banerjee, Snehasish
    Kotecha, Ketan
    Walambe, Rahee
    Karende, Hema
    Ameta, Juhi
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2021, 119