Novel dosimetric validation of a commercial CT scanner based deep learning automated contour solution for prostate radiotherapy

被引:0
|
作者
Berenato, Salvatore [1 ]
Williams, Matthew [1 ]
Woodley, Owain [1 ]
Moehler, Christian [2 ]
Evans, Elin [3 ]
Millin, Anthony E. [1 ]
Wheeler, Philip A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Velindre Canc Ctr, Radiotherapy Phys Dept, Cardiff CF14 2TL, Wales
[2] Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany
[3] Velindre Canc Ctr, Med Directorate, Cardiff, Wales
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2024年 / 122卷
关键词
AI; Automation; Prostate cancer; VMAT; IMRT; Delineation; Segmentation; CT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103339
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: OAR delineation accuracy influences: (i) a patient's optimised dose distribution (PD), (ii) the reported doses (RD) presented at approval, which represent plan quality. This study utilised a novel dosimetric validation methodology, comprehensively evaluating a new CT-scanner-based AI contouring solution in terms of PD and RD within an automated planning workflow. Methods: 20 prostate patients were selected to evaluate AI contouring for rectum, bladder, and proximal femurs. Five planning 'pipelines' were considered; three using AI contours with differing levels of manual editing (nominally none (AI(Std)), minor editing in specific regions (AI(MinEd)), and fully corrected (AI(FullEd))). Remaining pipelines were manual delineations from two observers (MDOb1, MDOb2). Automated radiotherapy plans were generated for each pipeline. Geometric and dosimetric agreement of contour sets AI(Std), AI(MinEd), AI(FullEd) and MDOb2 were evaluated against the reference set MDOb1. Non-inferiority of AI pipelines was assessed, hypothesising that compared to MDOb1, absolute deviations in metrics for AI contouring were no greater than that from MDOb2. Results: Compared to MDOb1, organ delineation time was reduced by 24.9 min (96 %), 21.4 min (79 %) and 12.2 min (45 %) for AI(Std), AI(MinEd) and AI(FullEd) respectively. All pipelines exhibited generally good dosimetric agreement with MDOb1. For RD, median deviations were within +/- 1.8 cm(3), +/- 1.7 % and +/- 0.6 Gy for absolute volume, relative volume and mean dose metrics respectively. For PD, respective values were within +/- 0.4 cm(3), +/- 0.5 % and +/- 0.2 Gy. Statistically (p < 0.05), AI(MinEd) and AI(FullEd) were dosimetrically non-inferior to MDOb2. Conclusions: This novel dosimetric validation demonstrated that following targeted minor editing (AI(MinEd)), AI contours were dosimetrically non-inferior to manual delineations, reducing delineation time by 79 %.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of MR-only treatment planning solution for prostate cancer radiotherapy
    Posiewnik, Michal
    Piotrowski, Tomasz
    WSPOLCZESNA ONKOLOGIA-CONTEMPORARY ONCOLOGY, 2021, 25 (04): : 241 - 245
  • [2] Dosimetric impact of contour editing on CT and MRI deep-learning autosegmentation for brain OARs
    Alzahrani, Nouf M.
    Henry, Ann M.
    Clark, Anna K.
    Al-Qaisieh, Bashar M.
    Murray, Louise J.
    Nix, Michael G.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (05):
  • [3] Dosimetric impact of deep learning-based CT auto-segmentation on radiation therapy treatment planning for prostate cancer
    Kawula, Maria
    Purice, Dinu
    Li, Minglun
    Vivar, Gerome
    Ahmadi, Seyed-Ahmad
    Parodi, Katia
    Belka, Claus
    Landry, Guillaume
    Kurz, Christopher
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [4] PATIENT-SPECIFIC FINETUNING OF DEEP LEARNING MODELS FOR ADAPTIVE RADIOTHERAPY IN PROSTATE CT
    Elmandy, Mohamed S.
    Ahuja, Tanuj
    van der Heide, U. A.
    Staring, Marius
    2020 IEEE 17TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING (ISBI 2020), 2020, : 577 - 580
  • [5] Deep learning model for automatic contouring of cardiovascular substructures on radiotherapy planning CT images: Dosimetric validation and reader study based clinical acceptability testing
    Fernandes, Miguel Garrett
    Bussink, Johan
    Stam, Barbara
    Wijsman, Robin
    Schinagl, Dominic A. X.
    Monshouwer, Rene
    Teuwen, Jonas
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 165 : 52 - 59
  • [6] Contour-guided deep learning based deformable image registration for dose monitoring during CBCT-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer
    Hemon, Cedric
    Rigaud, Bastien
    Barateau, Anais
    Tilquin, Florian
    Noblet, Vincent
    Sarrut, David
    Meyer, Philippe
    Bert, Julien
    De Crevoisier, Renaud
    Simon, Antoine
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (08):
  • [7] Automated contour propagation of the prostate from pCT to CBCT images via deep unsupervised learning
    Liang, Xiaokun
    Bibault, Jean-Emmanuel
    Leroy, Thomas
    Escande, Alexandre
    Zhao, Wei
    Chen, Yizheng
    Buyyounouski, Mark K.
    Hancock, Steven L.
    Bagshaw, Hilary
    Xing, Lei
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (04) : 1764 - 1770
  • [8] Development of deep learning-based novel auto-segmentation for the prostatic urethra on planning CT images for prostate cancer radiotherapy
    Takagi, Hisamichi
    Takeda, Ken
    Kadoya, Noriyuki
    Inoue, Koki
    Endo, Shiki
    Takahashi, Noriyoshi
    Yamamoto, Takaya
    Umezawa, Rei
    Jingu, Keiichi
    RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 17 (04) : 819 - 826
  • [9] Deep-learning-based joint rigid and deformable contour propagation for magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate radiotherapy
    Kolenbrander, Iris D.
    Maspero, Matteo
    Hendriksen, Allard A.
    Pollitt, Ryan
    van der Voort van Zyp, Jochem R. N.
    van den Berg, Cornelis A. T.
    Pluim, Josien P. W.
    van Eijnatten, Maureen A. J. M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (04) : 2367 - 2377
  • [10] Dosimetric Study of Deep Learning-Guided ITV Prediction in Cone-beam CT for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
    Zhang, Shujun
    Lv, Bo
    Zheng, Xiangpeng
    Li, Ya
    Ge, Weiqiang
    Zhang, Libo
    Mo, Fan
    Qiu, Jianjian
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10