共 33 条
The Impact of Deprescribing Interventions on the Drug Burden Index and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review
被引:6
作者:
Liu, Bonnie M.
[1
,2
,3
]
Redston, Mitchell R.
[4
]
Fujita, Kenji
[1
,2
]
Thillainadesan, Janani
[5
,6
,7
]
Gnjidic, Danijela
[8
]
Hilmer, Sarah N.
[1
,2
,3
,9
]
机构:
[1] Univ Sydney, Kolling Inst, Fac Med & Hlth, Ageing & Pharmacol Lab, Sydney, Australia
[2] Northern Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Sydney, Australia
[3] Royal North Shore Hosp, Aged Care Dept, Sydney, Australia
[4] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med, St George & Sutherland Clin Sch, Sydney, Australia
[5] Concord Hosp, Dept Geriatr Med, Sydney, Australia
[6] Concord Hosp, Ctr Educ & Res Ageing, Sydney, Australia
[7] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Concord Clin Sch, Sydney, Australia
[8] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Pharm, Sydney, Australia
[9] Royal North Shore Hosp, Clin Pharmacol Dept, Sydney, Australia
关键词:
Drug burden index;
deprescribing;
systematic review;
randomized controlled trials;
MEDICATIONS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105021
中图分类号:
R592 [老年病学];
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号:
03 ;
0303 ;
100203 ;
摘要:
Objectives: The Drug Burden Index (DBI) calculates a person's exposure to anticholinergic and sedative medications. We aimed to review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of deprescribing interventions that reported the DBI as an outcome, their characteristics, effectiveness in reducing the DBI, and impact on other outcomes. Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis. Setting and Participants: RCTs of deprescribing interventions where the DBI was measured as a primary or secondary outcome in humans within any setting were included. Methods: Electronic databases, citation indexes, and gray literature were searched from April 1, 2007, to September 1, 2023. Quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Results: Of 1721 records identified, 9 met the inclusion criteria. Six interventions were delivered by pharmacists and 3 were delivered by pharmacists/nurses or pharmacists/geriatricians. All interventions required at least intermediate-level skills and involved multiple components and target groups. Studies were conducted in the community (n = 5), nursing homes (n = 2), and hospitals (n = 2). The mean or median age was >= 75 years and most participants were women in all studies. Most (n = 6) studies were underpowered. The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 12 months. Three studies reported a lower DBI in the intervention group compared with control: 1 pharmacist independent prescriber-delivered in nursing homes (adjusted rate ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.92), 1 pharmacist/nurse practitioner-delivered in hospital (adjusted mean difference (MD), -0.28; 95% CI, -0.51 to -0.04), and 1 geriatrician/ pharmacist-delivered in hospital (MD, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.52 to -0.04). Meta-analysis showed no difference in the change in DBI between control and intervention groups in the community including nursing homes (MD, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.01) or hospital setting (MD, -0.19; 95% CI, -0.45 to 0.06). Interventions had inconsistent effects on cognition and no effect on other reported outcomes. Conclusions and Implications: RCTs of deprescribing interventions had no significant impact on reducing DBI or improving outcomes. Further suitably powered studies are required. (c) 2024 AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文