Treatment of textile wastewater in a single-step moving bed-membrane bioreactor: Comparison with conventional membrane bioreactor in terms of performance and membrane fouling

被引:0
|
作者
Tecirli, Emine Sule [1 ]
Akgun, Kadir [1 ]
Caglak, Abdulkadir [1 ]
Erkan, Hanife Sari [1 ]
Engin, Guleda Onkal [1 ]
机构
[1] Yildiz Tech Univ, Civil Engn Fac, Environm Engn Dept, TR-34220 Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
membrane fouling; moving-bed membrane bioreactor; textile wastewater; traditional membrane bioreactor; treatment performance; EXTRACELLULAR POLYMERIC SUBSTANCES; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; REVERSE-OSMOSIS; BIO-CARRIERS; HYBRID; MITIGATION; ELECTROCOAGULATION; NANOFILTRATION; DEWATERABILITY; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1111/wej.12942
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Membrane bioreactor (MBR) is a promising technology for the treatment of municipal and industrial wastewater, including highly contaminated textile wastewater. However, membrane fouling remains a critical challenge due to reduced flux. This study investigates the efficacy of a moving bed MBR (MB-MBR) technology for textile wastewater treatment, focusing on chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal, and its impact on mitigating membrane fouling. In a 50-day study, a conventional MBR (R1) was compared with an MB-MBR (R2) augmented with free-floating biocarriers (accounting for 20% of the reactor volume). Both systems used flat sheet ceramic membrane modules. The results indicate that the MB-MBR achieved superior performance, with COD and colour removal of 89% and 81%, respectively, compared with 87% and 73% in the conventional MBR. Importantly, the introduction of biocarriers eliminated the need for offline physical membrane cleaning in the MB-MBR. The free-floating biocarriers lowered transmembrane pressure, reduced capillary suction time and reduced fouling through their scouring action. A conventional MBR and moving bed-MBR were compared in textile wastewater treatment. Almost equal COD removal efficiencies were found in both operations. Higher color removals were obtained by moving bed-MBR process. The moving bed-MBR reduced the TMP, CST of sludge and membrane fouling propensity.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 480
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance Comparison of Conventional Membrane Bioreactor and Moving Bed Membrane Bioreactor for the Treatment of Synthetic Textile Wastewater
    Soysaloglu, Ayberk
    Takatas, Betul
    Erkan, Hanife Sari
    Caglak, Abdulkadir
    Engin, Guleda Onkal
    5TH EURASIAN WASTE MANAGEMENT SYMPOSIUM, EWMS 2020, 2020, : 528 - 532
  • [2] Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor and conventional membrane bioreactor systems. Part I: membrane fouling
    Duan, Liang
    Li, Shan
    Han, Lu
    Song, Yonghui
    Zhou, Beihai
    Zhang, Jing
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2015, 73 (09) : 4881 - 4890
  • [3] Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor and conventional membrane bioreactor systems. Part I: membrane fouling
    Liang Duan
    Shan Li
    Lu Han
    Yonghui Song
    Beihai Zhou
    Jing Zhang
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 73 : 4881 - 4890
  • [4] Performance evaluation of conventional membrane bioreactor and moving bed membrane bioreactor for synthetic textile wastewater treatment
    Erkan, Hanife Sari
    Caglak, Abdulkadir
    Soysaloglu, Ayberk
    Takatas, Betul
    Engin, Guleda Onkal
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2020, 38
  • [5] Comparison between a moving bed membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor on membrane fouling
    Yang, Shuai
    Yang, Fenglin
    Fu, Zhimin
    Lei, Ruibo
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 100 (24) : 6655 - 6657
  • [6] Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor and conventional membrane bioreactor systems. Part II: bacterial community
    Duan, Liang
    Tian, Yuan
    Liu, Xiaoling
    Song, Yonghui
    Yang, Liu
    Zhang, Jing
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2015, 73 (09) : 4891 - 4902
  • [7] Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor and conventional membrane bioreactor systems. Part II: bacterial community
    Liang Duan
    Yuan Tian
    Xiaoling Liu
    Yonghui Song
    Liu Yang
    Jing Zhang
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 73 : 4891 - 4902
  • [8] COMPARISON BETWEEN A FLUIDIZED BED MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR AND A CONVENTIONAL MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR FOR MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT
    Ma, Jin-xia
    Yang, Xiao-li
    Wang, Shi-he
    Guo, Yang
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2013, 22 (4A): : 1157 - 1162
  • [9] Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor (MB-MBR) and membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems: Influence of wastewater salinity variation
    Di Trapani, Daniele
    Di Bella, Gaetano
    Mannina, Giorgio
    Torregrossa, Michele
    Viviani, Gaspare
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 162 : 60 - 69
  • [10] COMPARISON BETWEEN A MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR, A HYBRID MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR-MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR AND A PURE MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR-MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR ON MEMBRANE FOULING
    Leyva-Diaz, J. C.
    Martin-Pascual, J.
    Fenice, M.
    Munio, M. M.
    Poyatos, J. M.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2015, 16 (04): : 1502 - 1508