Understanding participation and corporatization in service of diversity in free/libre and open source software development projects

被引:0
作者
Newton, Olivia B. [1 ]
Fiore, Stephen M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Inst Simulat & Training, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Philosophy, Orlando, FL USA
关键词
Open source software; Diversity; GITHUB;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2024.112163
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Issues associated with a lack of diversity and inclusivity persist in the domain of free/libre and open source software (FLOSS) development and in software development generally. Researchers have suggested that the corporatization of FLOSS affords opportunities for creating an inclusive workforce. To understand the potential for firms to increase diversity, we conducted a mixed-methods study of diversity and corporate engagement in FLOSS projects. We integrate the results of a qualitative survey and a big data analysis to understand developer perceptions of corporate engagement and its association with gender and geographic diversity. In the qualitative component, we collected responses from 64 FLOSS contributors to elicit their perspectives on corporate engagement. In the quantitative component, we analyzed GitHub data from 38 projects and 9,990 contributors to investigate differences in participation and diversity based on corporate engagement. We find that contributors vary across dimensions that can inform diversity interventions: stances toward corporations and orientation towards individual/collective benefits. Our results suggest that corporate engagement may limit a project's contributor base and geographic diversity. Yet, organizations subsidizing FLOSS have opportunities to increase access to projects which would benefit diversity. This research serves to identify individual and organizational factors which may harm and help diversity initiatives.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2022, Diversity and inclusion defined
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, P 2013 9 JOINT M FDN, DOI [DOI 10.1145/2491411.2491415, 10.1145/2491411.2491415]
  • [3] Uncovering the Periphery: A Qualitative Survey of Episodic Volunteering in Free/Libre and Open Source Software Communities
    Barcomb, Ann
    Kaufmann, Andreas
    Riehle, Dirk
    Stol, Klaas-Jan
    Fitzgerald, Brian
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2020, 46 (09) : 962 - 980
  • [4] Birkinbine B.J., 2015, The Political Economy of Communication, V2
  • [5] Ecosystems in GitHub and a Method for Ecosystem Identification using Reference Coupling
    Blincoe, Kelly
    Harrison, Francis
    Damian, Daniela
    [J]. 12TH WORKING CONFERENCE ON MINING SOFTWARE REPOSITORIES (MSR 2015), 2015, : 202 - 207
  • [6] Braun V., 2013, Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners
  • [7] Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN SPORT EXERCISE AND HEALTH, 2019, 11 (04) : 589 - 597
  • [8] Bryer J., 2022, Likert: analysis and visualization Likert items
  • [9] Burr V., 2015, Social constructionism, V3rd, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315715421
  • [10] Byrne D., 2022, Quality and Quantity, V56, P1391, DOI [10.1007/s11135-021-01182y, DOI 10.1007/S11135-021-01182-Y, 10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y]