Dispositional Empathy Among Psychotherapists: A Latent Profile Analysis

被引:0
作者
Lachance, Valerie [1 ]
Laverdiere, Olivier [1 ]
Kealy, David [2 ]
Ogrodniczuk, John S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Psychol, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Psychiat, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
empathy; latent profile analysis; personality; psychotherapy; therapists; PATHOLOGICAL NARCISSISM; COMPASSION FATIGUE; PERSONAL DISTRESS; THERAPIST EMPATHY; ATTACHMENT THEORY; IMPAIRMENT; PSYCHOLOGISTS; VALIDATION; VARIABLES; ALLIANCE;
D O I
10.1002/cpp.3016
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThis study examined therapists' dispositional empathy profiles and how they differ based on professional and personal characteristics.MethodA total of 376 clinicians was recruited for this study. Dispositional empathy was assessed with the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). Profiles were generated using latent profile analysis. Predictors of profiles were assessed with multiple self-report questionnaires measuring demographic and professional characteristics, romantic attachment styles, five-factor personality traits and vulnerable narcissism.ResultsA four-profile solution was retained with the following proportions: rational empathic (20%), disengaged/detached (10%), empathic immersion (35%) and insecure/self-absorbed (35%). Overall, few relationships were found regarding demographic and professional characteristics. In contrast, significant relationships were found between profile membership and personal characteristics, including avoidant and anxious attachment, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, intellect/imagination and vulnerable narcissism.ConclusionThe findings show that differences in therapists' empathic dispositions are linked to personality dimensions. Implications for psychotherapy research, practice and training are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] American Psychiatric Association, 1994, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596
  • [2] Auxiliary Variables in Mixture Modeling: Three-Step Approaches Using Mplus
    Asparouhov, Tihomir
    Muthen, Bengt
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2014, 21 (03) : 329 - 341
  • [3] Barkham M., 2017, How and why are some therapists better than others?: Understanding therapist effects, P13, DOI DOI 10.1037/0000034-002
  • [4] ATTACHMENT STYLES AMONG YOUNG-ADULTS - A TEST OF A 4-CATEGORY MODEL
    BARTHOLOMEW, K
    HOROWITZ, LM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 61 (02) : 226 - 244
  • [5] Empathy in Narcissistic Personality Disorder: From Clinical and Empirical Perspectives
    Baskin-Sommers, Arielle
    Krusemark, Elizabeth
    Ronningstam, Elsa
    [J]. PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 5 (03) : 323 - 333
  • [6] Batson CD, 2009, SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE OF EMPATHY, P3
  • [7] Beutler L.E., 2004, BERGIN GARFIELDS HDB, V5th, DOI DOI 10.1093/CLIPSY.BPH076
  • [8] Bohart A.C., 1997, EMPATHY RECONSIDERED, P419, DOI [DOI 10.1037/10226-018, DOI 10.1037/10226-031]
  • [9] Bohart A.C., 2002, PSYCHOTHERAPY RELATI, P89
  • [10] Trainee Theoretical Orientation: Profiles and Potential Predictors
    Boswell, James F.
    Castonguay, Louis G.
    Pincus, Aaron L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY INTEGRATION, 2009, 19 (03) : 291 - 312