An exploration of in-service teachers' framing, instrumental, and core design judgments in dynamic decision-making for technology integration

被引:1
作者
Xu, Meimei [1 ]
Stefaniak, Jill [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ houston, E cullen Bldg,Room 124aB, Houston, TX 77204 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA USA
关键词
Instructional design judgments; dynamic decision-making; pedagogical reasoning; technology integration; INSTRUCTIONAL-DESIGN; COLLABORATIVE DESIGN; KNOWLEDGE; BELIEFS; FRAMEWORK; BARRIERS; PEDAGOGY;
D O I
10.1080/15391523.2024.2356527
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Dynamic decision-making plays a critical role in teachers' instructional design and technology integration processes; it directly influences the design and development of teaching practices, student learning experiences, and learning environments. However, limited studies have investigated how teachers engage in dynamic decision-making processes in designing instruction and technology integration, wherein teachers are involved in multiple types of design judgments that inform their design decisions for instruction and technology integration. The purpose of this study was to explore teachers' framing, instrumental, and core judgments that were intertwined in dynamic decision-making for technology integration. The study utilized the critical decision method approach to investigate teachers' three prioritized design judgments in dynamic decision-making. The findings of this study helped us gain a better understanding of teachers' dynamic decision-making processes, pedagogical reasoning, and design judgments while designing instruction for technology integration. It also informs professional development strategies to develop teachers' instructional design decision-making skills for technology integration.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   BROADENING THE DEFINITION OF DECISION-MAKING - THE ROLE OF PRECHOICE SCREENING OF OPTIONS [J].
BEACH, LR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1993, 4 (04) :215-220
[2]  
Bennett S., 2002, Australian Journal of Educational Technology, V18, P1
[3]   The process of designing for learning: understanding university teachers' design work [J].
Bennett, Sue ;
Agostinho, Shirley ;
Lockyer, Lori .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 65 (01) :125-145
[4]  
Blackwell S., 2008, The Journal of Effective Teaching, V8, P77
[5]   Exploring teachers' use of TPACK in design talk: The collaborative design of technology-rich early literacy activities [J].
Boschman, Ferry ;
McKenney, Susan ;
Voogt, Joke .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2015, 82 :250-262
[6]   What is ?technology integration? and how is it measured in K-12 education? A systematic review of survey instruments from 2010 to 2021 [J].
Consoli, Tessa ;
Desiron, Juliette ;
Cattaneo, Alberto .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2023, 197
[7]   Expertise in design: an overview [J].
Cross, N .
DESIGN STUDIES, 2004, 25 (05) :427-441
[8]   THE TEACHER AS RE-DESIGNER OF TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATED ACTIVITIES FOR AN EARLY LITERACY CURRICULUM [J].
Cviko, Amina ;
McKenney, Susan ;
Voogt, Joke .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL COMPUTING RESEARCH, 2013, 48 (04) :447-468
[9]   Instructional Design Students' Design Judgment in Action [J].
Demiral-Uzan, Muruvvet .
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT QUARTERLY, 2015, 28 (03) :7-23
[10]  
Elliott R., 2005, A handbook of research methods for clinical and health psychology, V1, P147, DOI DOI 10.1093/MED:PSYCH/9780198527565.001.0001