Optimizing canopy spacing configuration enhances foxtail millet grain yield and water productivity by improving stalk lodging resistance in the North China Plain

被引:6
作者
Zhong, Yuanning [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Ting [3 ]
Qiao, Wenjun [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Wenwen [1 ]
Qiao, Yunzhou [1 ]
Li, Yongpeng [1 ]
Liu, Mengyu [1 ]
Ma, Yuzhao [1 ]
Dong, Baodi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Genet & Dev Biol, Ctr Agr Resources Res, Key Lab Agr Water Resources,Hebei Lab Agr Water Sa, Shijiazhuang 050021, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Inst Millet Crops, Key Res Lab Minor Cereal Crops Hebei Prov, Key Lab Genet Improvement & Utilizat Featured Coar, Shijiazhuang 050035, Peoples R China
关键词
Foxtail millet; Canopy light distribution; Lodging resistance; Grain yield; Water productivity; SETARIA-ITALICA; WINTER-WHEAT; DEVELOPMENTAL-STAGES; MAIZE CANOPY; SOIL-WATER; TRAITS; RICE; HYBRID; EFFICIENCY; CULTIVARS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eja.2024.127230
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Optimizing canopy spacing configuration can enhance resources utilization, supporting robust growth and dry matter production, while mitigating the risk of lodging and improving crop yield and quality. However, research specifically addressing optimal canopy spacing configurations for foxtail millet remains limited. Over a two-year period, a field experiment in the North China Plain assessed the impacts of four-row spacing configurations (T0: 40 + 40 cm; T1: 30 + 50 cm; T2: 20 + 60 cm; T3: 10 + 70 cm), to investigate the effects of row spacing configuration on lodging resistance, canopy spatial configuration, stem characteristics, yield, and water productivity (WP) of foxtail millet, aiming to elucidate the underlying regulatory mechanisms. Row spacing configurations significantly influenced lodging resistance, yield, and WP. Under T1, improvements were observed in stem morphology and mechanical properties, particularly in the 2nd-6th basal internodes (I2-I6). The light interception rate in T1 at wide rows in the middle canopy (30-90 cm aboveground) increased by 97.89 %, compared to T0. Partial least squares-structural equation modeling revealed that improved light interception in wide rows in the middle canopy contributed to a rise in diameter and dry plumpness of I2. This, in turn, promoted greater breaking resistance of I2 and tensile resistance, ultimately reducing the lodging likelihood. Simultaneously, the decrease in lodging resulted in higher yield and WP at yield level of foxtail millet. Therefore, T1 demonstrated the lowest lodging rate (67.34 %-91.92 % lower than T0), and the highest yield and WP at yield level (4.10 %-8.03 % and 20.79 %-22.46 % higher than T0). Optimizing canopy spacing configuration is essential for cultivating high-yielding and water-efficient foxtail millet populations. The results indicated that the 30 + 50 cm row spacing configuration improves light distribution in the middle canopy, enhancing lodging resistance and consequently increasing both yield and WP. This research offers a theoretical foundation for foxtail millet breeding and agronomic practices to achieve lower lodging rate, higher yields, and enhanced WP in the North China Plain.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Can wheat varietal mixtures buffer the impacts of water deficit? [J].
Adu-Gyamfi, Paul ;
Mahmood, Tariq ;
Trethowan, Richard .
CROP & PASTURE SCIENCE, 2015, 66 (08) :757-769
[2]   Nitrogen management improves lodging resistance and production in maize (Zea mays L.) at a high plant density [J].
Ahmad, Irshad ;
Batyrbek, Maksat ;
Ikram, Khushnuma ;
Ahmad, Shakeel ;
Kamran, Muhammad ;
Misbah ;
Khan, Raham Sher ;
Hou Fu-jiang ;
Han Qing-fang .
JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE, 2023, 22 (02) :417-433
[3]   Non-destructive estimation of root mass using electrical capacitance on ten herbaceous species [J].
Aulen, Maurice ;
Shipley, Bill .
PLANT AND SOIL, 2012, 355 (1-2) :41-49
[4]  
Austin DF, 2006, ECON BOT, V60, P143, DOI 10.1663/0013-0001(2006)60[143:FMSPFI]2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   Predicting yield losses caused by lodging in wheat [J].
Berry, P. M. ;
Spink, J. .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2012, 137 :19-26
[7]   Understanding and reducing lodging in cereals [J].
Berry, PM ;
Sterling, M ;
Spink, JH ;
Baker, CJ ;
Sylvester-Bradley, R ;
Mooney, SJ ;
Tams, AR ;
Ennos, AR .
ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, VOL 84, 2004, 84 :217-271
[8]   Can intercropping or mixed cropping of two genotypes enhance wheat lodging resistance? [J].
Cai, Tie ;
Peng, Dianliang ;
Wang, Rui ;
Jia, Xinlei ;
Qiao, Di ;
Liu, Tiening ;
Jia, Zhikuan ;
Wang, Zhenlin ;
Ren, Xiaolong .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2019, 239 :10-18
[9]   Effects of winter wheat row spacing on evapotranpsiration, grain yield and water use efficiency [J].
Chen, Suyin ;
Zhang, Xiying ;
Sun, Hongyong ;
Ren, Tusheng ;
Wang, Yanmei .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2010, 97 (08) :1126-1132
[10]   Growth, grain yield, and water use efficiency of rain-fed spring hybrid millet (Setaria italica) in plastic-mulched and unmulched fields [J].
Dong, Baodi ;
Liu, Mengyu ;
Jiang, Jingwei ;
Shi, Changhai ;
Wang, Xiaoming ;
Qiao, Yunzhou ;
Liu, Yueyan ;
Zhao, Zhihai ;
Ii, Dongxiao ;
Si, Fuyan .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2014, 143 :93-101