2021 Wildfires in Türkiye: A perspective from crisis management and crisis communication practices

被引:3
作者
Sari, Bektas [1 ]
机构
[1] Ege Univ, Ataturk Vocat Sch Hlth Serv, Bornova, Turkiye
关键词
crisis communication; crisis management; wildfire; FIRE WEATHER INDEX; FOREST; US; INFORMATION; RESPONSES; SEVERITY; DISASTER; MEDIA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/1468-5973.12594
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
T & uuml;rkiye has long been plagued by deadly natural hazards, including earthquakes, wildfires, landslides, and floods, which have caused widespread destruction throughout the country. 2021 Wildfires in T & uuml;rkiye, the most destructive in the country's history, have disrupted the region's ecological balance by destroying vast swathes of forests and the habitats of many species. This study aimed to explore crisis management and communication practices during the 2021 T & uuml;rkiye wildfire. This qualitative research utilized a phenomenological approach and the discourse analysis method to study the data. The study's methodology aimed to delve into the lived experiences surrounding the disaster and analyze the statements of the responsible minister to uncover best practices. The results indicate that wildfires were not contained during the initial day, and a needs assessment was impossible. During the response, frequent disinformation, rumors, and suspicious situations arose, indicating difficulties in information management. A consistent call for solidarity is beneficial for crisis management and communication. However, a debate about inadequate resources highlights trust and transparency issues in crisis communication. Moreover, drawing comparisons with other countries and making self-congratulatory statements about success and strength are not aligned with crisis management or crisis communication and may be perceived as politically motivated.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments [J].
Agee, JK ;
Skinner, CN .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 211 (1-2) :83-96
[2]  
Albtoush R, 2011, U POLITEH BUCH SER C, V73, P53
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, SOMA 10, DOI [10.1145/1964858.1964869, DOI 10.1145/1964858.1964869]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, National response framework
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Qualitative Research, DOI DOI 10.1177/1468794106065006
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ICS Review Document. Intermediate Incident Command System for Expanding Incidents
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2022, 2021 Disasters in Numbers
[8]   Combining wildfire behaviour simulations and network analysis to support wildfire management: A Mediterranean landscape case study [J].
Aparicio, Bruno A. ;
Pereira, Jose M. C. ;
Santos, Francisco C. ;
Bruni, Chiara ;
Sa, Ana C. L. .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 137
[9]   Exploring communication media options in an inter-organizational disaster response coordination network using agent-based simulation [J].
Aros, Susan K. ;
Gibbons, Deborah E. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 269 (02) :451-465
[10]   The interplay between governmental communications and fellow citizens' reactions via twitter: Experimental results of a theoretical crisis in the Netherlands [J].
Bakker, Marije H. ;
van Bommel, Marco ;
Kerstholt, Jose H. ;
Giebels, Ellen .
JOURNAL OF CONTINGENCIES AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT, 2019, 27 (03) :265-271