Prognostic Factors after Surgical Treatment for Spinal Metastases

被引:2
|
作者
Murotani, Kazuhiro [1 ]
Fujibayashi, Shunsuke [1 ]
Otsuki, Bungo [1 ]
Shimizu, Takayoshi [1 ,4 ]
Sono, Takashi [1 ]
Onishi, Eijiro [2 ]
Kimura, Hiroaki [3 ]
Tamaki, Yasuyuki [4 ]
Tsubouchi, Naoya [5 ]
Ota, Masato [6 ]
Tsutsumi, Ryosuke [7 ]
Ishibe, Tatsuya [8 ]
Matsuda, Shuichi [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Grad Sch Med, 54 Shogoin Kawahara cho, Sakyo, Kyoto 6068507, Japan
[2] Kobe City Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Gen Hosp, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
[3] Amagasaki Gen Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
[4] Wakayama Red Cross Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Wakayama, Japan
[5] Kyoto Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Kyoto, Japan
[6] Kitano Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Osaka, Japan
[7] Osaka Red Cross Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Osaka, Japan
[8] Hino Mem Hosp, Shiga Spine Ctr, Hino, Shiga, Japan
关键词
Neoplasm metastasis; Epidemiology; Prognosis; Katagiri score; Spine surgery; SCORING SYSTEM; DISEASE; INSTABILITY; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; MANAGEMENT; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.31616/asj.2023.0376
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: A retrospective multicenter case series was conducted. Purpose: This study aimed to investigate survival and prognostic factors after surgery for a metastatic spinal tumor. Overview of Literature: Prognostic factors after spinal metastasis surgery remain controversial. Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted. The study participants included 345 patients who underwent surgery for spinal metastases from 2010 to 2020 at nine referral spine centers in Japan. Data for each patient were extracted from medical records. To identify the factors predicting survival prognosis after surgery, univariate analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: The mean age was 65.9 years. Common primary tumors were lung (n=72), prostate (n=61), and breast (n=39), and 67.8% (n=234) presented with osteolytic lesions. The epidural spinal cord compression scale score 2 or 3 was recognized in 79.0% (n=271). Frankel grade A paralysis accounted for 1.4% (n=5), and 73.3% (n=253) were categorized as intermediate or high risk according to the new Katagiri score. The overall survival rates were -71.0% at 6 months, 57.4% at 12, and 43.3% at 24. In the univariate analysis, Frankel grade A (hazard ratio [HR], 3.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-10.50; p <0.05), intermediate risk (HR, 3.34; 95% CI, 2.10-5.32; p <0.01), and high risk (HR, 7.77; 95% CI, 4.72-12.8; p <0.01) in the new Katagiri score were significantly associated with poor survival. On the contrary, postoperative chemotherapy (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.15-0.36; p <0.01), radiation therapy (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26-0.70; p <0.01), and both adjuvant therapy (HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.14-0.32; p <0.01) were suggested to improve survival. Conclusions: Surgical indications for patients with Frankel grade A or intermediate or high risk in the new Katagiri score should be carefully considered because of poor survival. Chemotherapy or radiation therapy should be considered after surgery for better survival.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 397
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Perioperative blood transfusion does not decrease survival after surgical treatment of spinal metastases
    Clausen, Caroline
    Lonn, Lars
    Morgen, Soren Schmidt
    Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
    Frevert, Susanne Christiansen
    Johansson, Par Ingemar
    Dahl, Benny
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 23 (08) : 1791 - 1796
  • [22] Surgical treatment for brain metastases: prognostic factors and survival in 177 patients
    Andreas M. Stark
    Hauke Tscheslog
    Ralf Buhl
    Janka Held-Feindt
    H. Maximilian Mehdorn
    Neurosurgical Review, 2005, 28 : 115 - 119
  • [23] Surgical treatment for brain metastases: prognostic factors and survival in 177 patients
    Stark, AM
    Tscheslog, H
    Buhl, R
    Held-Feindt, J
    Mehdorn, HM
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2005, 28 (02) : 115 - 119
  • [24] Risk Factors for Infectious Complications after Surgical Treatment of Spinal Metastases in Patients with Breast and Kidney Cancer
    Smekalenkov, O. A.
    Ptashnikov, D. A.
    Zaborovskii, N. S.
    Mikhaylov, D. A.
    Masevnin, S. V.
    Denisov, A. A.
    TRAVMATOLOGIYA I ORTOPEDIYA ROSSII, 2019, 25 (04): : 126 - 133
  • [25] Comparing prognostic factors in patients with spinal metastases: a literature review
    Popovic, Marko
    Lemke, Madeline
    Zeng, Liang
    Chen, Emily
    Nguyen, Janet
    Thavarajah, Nemica
    DiGiovanni, Julia
    Caporusso, Francesco
    Chow, Edward
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2012, 12 (03) : 345 - 356
  • [26] Survival prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in patients with spinal metastases
    Vincent Pointillart
    Jean-Marc Vital
    Rachid Salmi
    Abou Diallo
    Gerald M. Quan
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2011, 137 : 849 - 856
  • [27] Surgical management and prognostic factors of spinal metastatic tumors
    Elmesallamy, Wael A. A.
    Taha, Mahmoud M.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 35 (01)
  • [28] Effect of surgical decompression of spinal metastases in acute treatment - Predictors of neurological outcome
    Hohenberger, Christoph
    Schmidt, Corinna
    Hoehne, Julius
    Brawanski, Alexander
    Zeman, Florian
    Schebesch, Karl-Michael
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 52 : 74 - 79
  • [29] Separation Surgery for Spinal Metastases: Effect of Spinal Radiosurgery on Surgical Treatment Goals
    Moussazadeh, Nelson
    Laufer, Ilya
    Yamada, Yoshiya
    Bilsky, Mark H.
    CANCER CONTROL, 2014, 21 (02) : 168 - 174
  • [30] Prognostic Factors After Surgical Treatment of Liver Metastases from Breast Cancer-19 Years of Experience
    Prochazkova, Kristyna
    Pivovarcikova, Kristyna
    Rousarova, Milena
    Vodicka, Josef
    Hosek, Petr
    Treskova, Inka
    Hes, Ondrej
    Kucera, Radek
    Topolcan, Ondrej
    Treska, Vladislav
    IN VIVO, 2021, 35 (01): : 417 - 422