Elements of Return-to-Work Interventions for Workers on Long-Term Sick Leave: A Systematic Literature Review

被引:3
作者
de Geus, Christa J. C. [1 ,3 ]
Huysmans, Maaike A. [1 ,3 ]
van Rijssen, H. Jolanda [1 ,2 ,3 ]
de Maaker-Berkhof, Marianne [1 ,3 ]
Schoonmade, Linda J. [4 ]
Anema, Johannes R. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Publ & Occupat Hlth, Amsterdam UMC, Boechorststr 7, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Dutch Inst Employee Benefit Schemes UWV, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] AMC UMCG VUmc UWV, Res Ctr Insurance Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam NL, Univ Lib, Boelelaan 1117,POB 7057, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Disability pension; Vocational rehabilitation; RTW; Work disability; Intervention; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; MAJOR DEPRESSION; BACK-PAIN; REHABILITATION; DISABILITY; EMPLOYEES; PROGRAM; HEALTH; PLACEMENT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s10926-024-10203-0
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose The aim of this systematic review is to identify vocational rehabilitation (VR) interventions that are effective to enhance return-to-work (RTW) for people on long-term sick leave (> 90 days) and to identify main elements of these interventions. Methods Six electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies published up to February 2022. Each article was screened independently by two different reviewers. Thereafter, one author performed the data-extraction which was checked by another author. The EPHPP quality assessment tool was used to appraise the methodological quality of the studies. Results 11.837 articles were identified. 21 articles were included in the review, which described 25 interventions. Results showed that ten interventions were more effective than usual care on RTW. Two interventions had mixed results. The effective interventions varied widely in content, but were often more extensive than usual care. Common elements of the effective interventions were: coaching, counseling and motivational interviewing, planning return to work, placing the worker in work or teaching practical skills and advising at the workplace. However, these elements were also common in interventions that were not effective on RTW compared to usual care and can therefore not explain why certain interventions are effective and others are not. Conclusion The effective interventions included in this study were often quite extensive and aimed at multiple phases of the RTW-process of the worker. In the future, researchers need to describe the population and the content of the investigated interventions more elaborate to be able to better compare VR interventions and determine what elements make interventions effective.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 180
页数:22
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Is there really a "golden hour" for work disability interventions? A narrative review
    Aasdahl, Lene
    Fimland, Marius Steiro
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 42 (04) : 586 - 593
  • [2] Multidisciplinary Intervention and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Return-to-Work and Increased Employability among Patients with Mental Illness and/or Chronic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Berglund, Erik
    Anderzen, Ingrid
    Andersen, Asa
    Carlsson, Lars
    Gustavsson, Catharina
    Wallman, Thorne
    Lytsy, Per
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (11)
  • [3] Return to work: A comparison of two cognitive behavioural interventions in cases of work-related psychological complaints among the self-employed
    Blonk, Roland W. B.
    Brenninkmeijer, Veerle
    Lagerveld, Suzanne E.
    Houtman, Irene L. D.
    [J]. WORK AND STRESS, 2006, 20 (02) : 129 - 144
  • [4] De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote
    Bramer, Wichor M.
    Giustini, Dean
    de Jonge, Gerdien B.
    Holland, Leslie
    Bekhuis, Tanja
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 2016, 104 (03) : 240 - 243
  • [5] Prevalence, types, and combinations of multiple problems among recipients of work disability benefits
    Brongers, Kor A.
    Hoekstra, Tialda
    Roelofs, Pepijn D. D. M.
    Brouwer, Sandra
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (16) : 4303 - 4310
  • [6] Randomized controlled trial of workplace-based rehabilitation for work-related rotator cuff disorder
    Cheng, Andy Shu-Kei
    Hung, Leung-Kim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2007, 17 (03) : 487 - 503
  • [7] Ciliska D., 1998, Effective Public Health Practice Project. Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies
  • [8] A limited functional restoration program for injured workers: A randomized trial
    Corey, DT
    Koepfler, LE
    Etlin, D
    Day, HI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 1996, 6 (04) : 239 - 249
  • [9] A Decision Aid to Support Vocational Rehabilitation Professionals Offering Tailored Care to Benefit Recipients with a Long-Term Work Disability: A Feasibility Study
    de Geus, Christa J. C.
    Huysmans, Maaike A.
    van Rijssen, H. Jolanda
    Juurlink, Trees T.
    de Maaker-Berkhof, Marianne
    Anema, Johannes R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2024, 34 (01) : 128 - 140
  • [10] Return to work factors and vocational rehabilitation interventions for long-term, partially disabled workers: a modified Delphi study among vocational rehabilitation professionals
    de Geus, Christa J. C.
    Huysmans, Maaike A.
    van Rijssen, H. Jolanda
    Anema, Johannes R.
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)